• Home
  • News
  • Sprint plans to oppose the merging of T-Mobile with AT&T

Sprint plans to oppose the merging of T-Mobile with AT&T

Posted: , by Nick T.

Categories: Bookmark

Share:

Discuss 45
Sprint plans to oppose the merging of T-Mobile with AT&T
When AT&T announced its plans to acquire the nation's fourth largest wireless carrier, T-Mobile, many started questioning Sprint's future and whether it would be able to cope with the shift in competition. It was natural for Sprint to stand firmly against the merging of the two companies, just as it became evident from what Sprint's CEO, Dan Hesse, shared in a yesterday's interview at the CTIA wireless trading show.

According to Mr. Hesse, once T-Mobile becomes a part of AT&T and the resulting entity emerges as the largest wireless carrier in the U.S., this would have a negative impact on industry innovation and could result in 79% of subscribers nationwide to use the services of only two carriers, namely AT&T and Verizon. Sprint's CEO shared his intentions to bring his concerns to the attention of the U.S. Congress in an effort to oppose the merging of the two carriers and to retain the status quo on the wireless market.

AT&T responded with an email saying that it was ready to address whatever issues Sprint may have to present and that it was expecting to see its competitor's disapproval of the proposed coalition. The U.S. House Judiciary Committee is yet to approve or reject the $39 billion acquisition between AT&T and T-Mobile. We should also point out that Dan Hesse refused to comment when prompted whether Sprint has ever been in the talks of taking over T-Mobile or not.

source: Bloomberg via Phone Scoop

Share:

Discuss45

45 Comments

This comment is hidden because of its low rating. Show

1. BaiGanyo posted on 23 Mar 2011, 18:02 5 13

Um, yeah, 80% market share with 2 carriers, largely because of mergers? Very uncompetitive market for consumers. Unheard of in almost any country in the world,

4. clevername posted on 23 Mar 2011, 18:14 7 4

What are you talking about? To say it's almost unheard of in any other nation is uninformed at best. Several nations have a federally controlled wireless provider and no other options. Canada really only has 2 major carriers same with Japan and England as well. Many countries only have 2 maybe 3 major options. 79% of people would be with two carriers true but that's by choice. No one is forcing them to stay away from sprint or any prepaid or regional carrier. It doesn't leave people with only 3 choices. It leaves people with 3 major choices and a bunch of other smaller choices. We have more carriers in the US than any other nation.

10. kcombs posted on 23 Mar 2011, 19:12

don't forget China mobile that has 570 million customers, the largest carrier in the world in terms of subscribers.

23. Donkeysauce (unregistered) posted on 23 Mar 2011, 21:10 2 5

Talk about uninformed! Canada isn't a real country!

32. BaiGanyo posted on 23 Mar 2011, 23:37 2 1

Um, Canada has 3 major carriers, and the top 2 equals only 65% of market share. Big difference. And no, the us does not have more carriers than any country. Whoever is telling you this information is wrong. Please name all the countries that only have 2 carriers, I'd be interested to know which they are. And which countries have 80% controlled by only 2 companies? Please provide facts instead of patriotic propaganda. I seriously doubt you have ever had a wireless account in any country but the states.

34. BaiGanyo posted on 23 Mar 2011, 23:57 2 1

Here's the situation in the UK. Not 2 like you said. The top 2 barely equals 50%.
http://www.marketresearch.com/product/display.asp?productid=2441533

Canada--http://wirelessnorth.ca/2009/04/09/real-marketshare-of-canadian-carriers-in-case-you-were-wondering/

Japan--http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110306005033/en/Japan-127-Million-Mobile-Subscriber-C onnections-2012

The article about Japan names at least 4 carriers, with the top one having 47% market share--with that expected to DROP BECAUSE OF REGULATIONS!

OK, what other tea party anti regulation propaganda would you like to spout off, with NO facts to back any of it up?

35. Gawain posted on 24 Mar 2011, 00:28 1

I know this is splitting hairs, but Canada has at least three major players, Bell, Rogers, and Telus. Japan has three, SoftBank, NTT, and au/KDDI. Even in Europe, like UK, Vodafone, O2, Orange/T-Mobile.

To your other point, while I don't support the merger, it will likely be approved by regulators, albeit with a ton of divestitures in the process. All those divestitures, I would look at USCC at buying a lot of them, and expanding their footprint, perhaps MetroPCS as well. As you said, there is no shortage of options here in the US.

36. BaiGanyo posted on 24 Mar 2011, 00:46 1

I agree there are options in some of the larger metro areas, but if we have a competitive market, that is something to preserve, to avoid another "necessary" merger in another few years, and then another. Simply considering niche players like metro pcs and cricket to be real competition isn't realistic because they are still dependent on national carriers for roaming, and for now, they allow voice because the government made them, but they are still not restricted in a lot of data areas. That's a big problem. Also, the prepaid market has less choice of carriers to piggy back on now, so that will raise their prices, which even further reduces "competition."

13. JG (unregistered) posted on 23 Mar 2011, 19:37 1

Here in Mexico we have Telcel that has a 70% market share followed by Movistar with a mere 20%.

37. tuminatr posted on 24 Mar 2011, 00:47

and both owned by carlos slim

25. BobbyTaba posted on 23 Mar 2011, 21:27 3

There are also people that will leave Sprint for the iPhone cuz they would )e only major company without it

38. tuminatr posted on 24 Mar 2011, 00:49 1

the real honest truth is sprint knows if this merger goes through Verizon will try to buy sprint, so sprint opposes the merger

48. snowgator posted on 24 Mar 2011, 12:57

Verizon is pushing 100 million subscribers on it's own. It has taken the iPhone advantage away from AT&T, and has service in every area that AT&T and T-Mobile has(to my knowledge). Phone producers are pursuing them to get on their sales sheet, and they are pushing LTE to the point where some consumers think they invented it. Why, again, would Verizon need Sprint???

2. Brenda 123 (unregistered) posted on 23 Mar 2011, 18:02 8 5

The merging of T-mobile and at&t does not need Sprint's approval.

3. Tre-Nitty posted on 23 Mar 2011, 18:12 6 10

Dan Hesse is getting on my nerves. Worry about your customers, which you have plenty and just shut up already.

5. Hello-dirt posted on 23 Mar 2011, 18:24 10 2

I think he is worried about his customers silly goose. Just like many small businesses go out of business due to big box stores, Sprint is worried that 1) he'll lose his company and job, 2) that he will not be able to compete with the big carriers with phones that people want, 3) Sprint will not have enough income to bid for more spectrum, if the extra spectrum is opened up for bidding, and 4) I am happy that someone is forcing ATT and the FCC to actually think about what could happen. I am sure there are other reasons, but I wouldn't want to irritate you further.

9. Tre-Nitty posted on 23 Mar 2011, 18:51 4 5

I'm sorry that you care so much about a Guy who is probably worth more than you'll ever see. Sorry I don't have sympathy and don't give a shit about Dan Hesse losing his customers. Btw sprint has about 50 million customers, so I think they'll be fine. Oh yeah your poor attempts at humor don't irritate me. I don't know you or care that you exist.

16. JW1ngman posted on 23 Mar 2011, 20:14 2

its the fear of monopoly. just like gas they will get you by the balls and then you have to pay whatever they ask for. we live in a country of competition and it keeps a healthy balance of economy. trenitty, youre just negative on everything you comment on.

17. remixfa posted on 23 Mar 2011, 20:32 3

i dont know why sprint is so worried. i think it puts them in a banner position to pick up tons of pissed off Tmobile customers. Sprint will only GAIN from this situation, at least as far as customers go, if they play their cards well. As the only major "value" carrier left, they will be in a golden position as ATT and VZW go after eachother.

They just need to keep working on getting kick ass android phones, keep a positive "we care" image, expand out their 4g, and work on their customer service issues, and life will be grand.

Im not worried about it.

22. homineyhominey posted on 23 Mar 2011, 21:06 4 1

hasn't sprint won tons of customer service awards the last year? They had THE biggest increase in customer satisfaction of ANY company in ANY industry. AT&T bought out T-Mo for customer service, although i never really had luck with T-Mo customer service either. Sprint's spectrum holdings now are the industry leader. No one comes even close. Verizon's network has sucked since the iPhone came to them.

On another note, has no one seen or heard Dan's slams against the other companies?

Jim Cramer: My phone freezes, whose fault?

Dan: It's cause you have Verizon.

Dan to AT&T CEO: I thought you and T-mo had 4g?

Want to comment? Please login or register.

All content (phone reviews, news, specs, info), design and layouts are Copyright 2001-2012 phoneArena.com. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part or in any form or medium without written permission is prohibited!
Privacy | Terms of use