Nokia 5 Review

6comments

Introduction


The Nokia brand is back on the smartphone stage. HMD Global, the company which now develops and markets phones under the iconic name, has already introduced three Android-powered, budget-friendly handsets: the entry-level Nokia 3, the mid-range Nokia 6, and the Nokia 5, which we'll examine in the paragraphs that follow.

As its name suggests, the Nokia 5 occupies the space between HMD's other two Android phones. It is not as cheap as the Nokia 3 or as well-equipped as the Nokia 6, but it comes with a metal body, it offers a convenient fingerprint scanner, and it flaunts a 5.2-inch display. And at a price of just €190 (~$220), perhaps the Nokia 5 is worthy of attention. Let's see if that's the case.

Design


The design of the Nokia 5 is definitely one of its strong points – it has a premium feel thanks to its all-metal body. This sensation is further amplified by the rounded sides and corners which make the device very comfortable to hold. Weighing in at 160g (5.64 oz), the handset also feels quite sturdy, somehow reminding us of the Nokia phones from the good old days.


The power and volume keys are clicky and responsive. The fingerprint scanner embedded in the home button is truly a welcome addition at this price point and is generally reliable, although not the fastest.

At the very bottom you'll find a microUSB port, not the more modern USB Type-C one, which means that you won't get the convenience of using a reversible charging cable. Meanwhile, the 3.5mm audio jack is situated at the top.

The handset doesn't have any sort of water protection, so keep that in mind.


Nokia 5
Dimensions

5.89 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches

149.7 x 72.5 x 8.05 mm

Weight

5.64 oz (160 g)

Motorola Moto G5
Dimensions

5.68 x 2.87 x 0.37 inches

144.3 x 73. x 9.5 mm

Weight

5.13 oz (146 g)

Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017)
Dimensions

5.33 x 2.61 x 0.31 inches

135.4 x 66.2 x 7.9 mm

Weight

4.87 oz (138 g)

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
Dimensions

5.74 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches

145.8 x 72.3 x 8.1 mm

Weight

5.57 oz (158 g)

Nokia 5
Dimensions

5.89 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches

149.7 x 72.5 x 8.05 mm

Weight

5.64 oz (160 g)

Motorola Moto G5
Dimensions

5.68 x 2.87 x 0.37 inches

144.3 x 73. x 9.5 mm

Weight

5.13 oz (146 g)

Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017)
Dimensions

5.33 x 2.61 x 0.31 inches

135.4 x 66.2 x 7.9 mm

Weight

4.87 oz (138 g)

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016)
Dimensions

5.74 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches

145.8 x 72.3 x 8.1 mm

Weight

5.57 oz (158 g)

Compare these and other phones using our Size Comparison tool.


Display


The Nokia 5 comes with a 5.2-inch 720p IPS LCD display. This translates to a rather low pixel density of 282ppi. Obviously, the screen isn't the sharpest on the market, but some corners had to be cut for the phone to sell at less than €200.


Fortunately, this is pretty much where the bad news end. The maximum and minimum brightness levels respectively stand at 598 and 2 nits, ensuring good readability in both sunny and dark environments. The fact that the display is polarized should further improve outdoor legibility. With a color temperature of 7400K, whites appear slightly bluer than intended, but the overall color reproduction isn't too out of whack and is much, much better than what can be seen on the Nokia 3.



Interface and performance



HMD's Nokia smartphones come with an almost stock version of Android. This is done to ensure a bloat-free experience and, no less importantly, timely updates. The Nokia 5 ships with Android Nougat 7.1.1 out of the box, and our unit currently has the latest Android security patch installed. You won't find many other up-to-date budget Android phones. Many users will undoubtedly appreciate this, and we certainly hope that the practice continues in the future.

Performance-wise, there's nothing to write home about. The handset packs the octa-core Snapdragon 430 chipset clocked at 1.4 GHz coupled with 2GB of RAM. Cruising through the home screen and proprietary apps like Contacts or Messaging is generally smooth, but booting up Facebook and scrolling around or browsing a photo gallery does cause the phone to stutter. This can also be observed in Chrome on certain occasions. Loading times can also be dreadful, especially on more demanding games. At the end of the day, you get what you pay for.

Taking advantage of the microSD expansion slot would be a good idea, as the Android system occupies almost half of the 16GB of internal storage.

AnTuTuHigher is better
Nokia 545534
Motorola Moto G545621.66
Samsung Galaxy A3(2017)45938
Samsung Galaxy J5(2016)28513
JetStreamHigher is better
Nokia 521.819
Motorola Moto G521.060
Samsung Galaxy A3(2017)23.803
Samsung Galaxy J5(2016)17.261
GFXBench T-Rex HD on-screenHigher is better
Nokia 520
Motorola Moto G514.33
Samsung Galaxy A3(2017)19
Samsung Galaxy J5(2016)9.33
GFXBench Manhattan 3.1 on-screenHigher is better
Nokia 510
Motorola Moto G54.5
Samsung Galaxy A3(2017)7.3
Samsung Galaxy J5(2016)3.9
Basemark OS IIHigher is better
Nokia 5957.33
Motorola Moto G5801.33
Samsung Galaxy A3(2017)993
Samsung Galaxy J5(2016)555.66
Geekbench 4 single-coreHigher is better
Nokia 5691.66
Motorola Moto G5621.66
Samsung Galaxy A3(2017)674.33
Geekbench 4 multi-coreHigher is better
Nokia 52895.33
Motorola Moto G52566.33
Samsung Galaxy A3(2017)3224

Camera


The Nokia 5 sports a single 13MP f/2.0 main shooter with Dual-LED flash and phase-detection autofocus, as well as an 8MP front-facing camera. On paper, the setup does seem adequate, but real-life use shows that it doesn't always deliver the goods.


We were able to capture some decent shots with the main cam on certain occasions, but some of our pictures turned out a little overexposed. The dynamic range isn't stellar either, which is why highlights in certain scenes are brighter than they should be. Low-light photos appear noisy and aren't sharp, while the camera app itself is a bit too basic.

Things are better with the front camera. It is capable of producing some accurate shots and has autofocus, which is great for a phone in this price segment. The feature has been added to help produce sharper selfies, and the results are more than satisfactory.


Taking a picLower is betterTaking an HDR pic(sec)Lower is betterCamSpeed scoreHigher is betterCamSpeed score with flashHigher is better
Nokia 52.3
4.6
594
575
Motorola Moto G52
2.6
800
570
Samsung Galaxy A3(2017)2
2.7
365
210
Samsung Galaxy J5(2016)3.1
No data
482
266

Video recording


We were pleasantly surprised by the video recording capabilities of this handset. There's no 4K on board which is understandable, but shooting in 1080p is quite enjoyable, and video quality is good overall. Still, there isn't any stabilization of any sort, so some videos might appear shaky, and even though autofocusing is generally fast, faster-moving objects tend to give it a hard time.

Video Thumbnail

Multimedia


The Nokia 5 won't be taking the "Best phone for multimedia" prize, but it's not too horrible of a performer. The 720p display does the job for gaming and YouTube videos, but watching full-length movies might be a bit of a stretch.

The single speaker located on the bottom is sufficiently loud but depth is certainly lacking. As we mentioned earlier, there is a 3.5mm audio jack present on the top, but you might want to avoid using the earphones that ship with the handset, as they are rather uncomfortable.

Loudspeaker loudness(dB)Higher is better
Nokia 574
Motorola Moto G581
Samsung Galaxy A3(2017)77
Samsung Galaxy J5(2016)77




Call quality and connectivity


The Nokia 5 is a bit of a mixed bag in terms of call quality. Voices coming out of the earpiece speaker can be a bit distorted, which means that you could potentially have trouble understanding your callers when you’re in a noisy environment. However, the microphone is actually pretty decent, so your callers will be able to hear you clearly.

All European LTE bands are supported on this mid-ranger but don't count on getting 4G if you live in the USA. Still, a North American version of the phone could very well emerge soon, as HMD has stated that it plans to release all of its devices globally.

As for connectivity options, you get a standard package: Bluetooth 4.1, NFC, GPS, 2.4 and 5GHz Wi-Fi, and so on.

Battery



There's a 3,000mAh battery powering the Nokia 5. It managed to last 8 hours and 18 minutes when put through our custom test, and it will probably get you a day and a half between charges in real life. This is a pretty decent score, but we must mention that there are a good number of handsets at this price range offering a superior battery life.

Also, there's room for improvement with charging speeds, as it takes 141 minutes for the Nokia 5 to go from 0 to 100%.

Battery life(hours)Higher is better
Nokia 58h 18 min(Average)
Motorola Moto G57h 33 min(Average)
Samsung Galaxy A3(2017)11h 4 min(Excellent)
Samsung Galaxy J5(2016)8h 41 min(Good)
Full Charge(hours)Lower is better
Nokia 52h 21 min
Motorola Moto G52h 13 min
Samsung Galaxy A3(2017)1h 52 min
Samsung Galaxy J5(2016)2h 33 min

Conclusion


All things considered, the Nokia 5 is a pretty smartphone that comes with a clean and up-to-date software, but ultimately disappoints in terms of performance. Some people will undoubtedly find it – as well as its €190 ($222) price tag – appealing, but it certainly isn't the best budget phone on the market.

Your alternatives: the Moto G5 can be currently purchased for €175 and provides a similar package while also boasting a Full HD display, although its battery life is a bit inferior. Another handset that comes to mind is the Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017). It's a bit more expensive than the Nokia 5, but it has water and dust protection and superior cameras, while also lasting longer between charges.

Video Thumbnail


Pros

  • Great design and build quality
  • Good battery life
  • Android software is clean and up-to-date
  • Reliable fingerprint scanner
  • Decent video recording

Cons

  • Performance is underwhelming, slow to load
  • Hit and miss photo quality
  • Limited internal storage

PhoneArena Rating:

6.5

Recommended Stories

Loading Comments...
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless