Samsung Galaxy J3 lands its FCC certification

Samsung Galaxy J3 lands its FCC certification
Earlier this month, we told you about the Samsung Galaxy J3 (SM-J3109), an entry-level handset sporting a 5-inch display with a 720 x 1280 resolution. Now, it appears that the device has received its FCC certification. This means that the handset could soon be made official by Samsung. While not much information was released by the Feds, the documents reveal that the phone was tested for LTE, 3G, and 2G connectivity.

The handset did make it through the GFXBench benchmark test three weeks ago, which is when we first brought the device to your attention. From that test, we expect the unit to feature the 64-bit Snapdragon 410 SoC under the hood, containing a quad-core 1.2GHz CPU and the Adreno 306 GPU. 1GB of RAM is inside, along with 8GB of expandable native memory. An 8MP camera can be found on the back of the phone, while the front-facing 5MP snapper handles selfies and video chats. Android 5.1.1 or Android 6.0 will be pre-installed when the phone is released.

Pricing and availability for the Galaxy J3 will be revealed once Samsung officially takes the wraps off of the device. In September, the manufacturer unveiled the Samsung Galaxy J2 in India, priced at $129. That phone comes with a 4.7-inch screen, carrying a 540 x 960 (qHD) resolution. Inside that model is the Exynos 3475 chipset.

Thanks for the tip!

source: TimesNews.co.uk

FEATURED VIDEO

9 Comments

1. Clars123

Posts: 1073; Member since: Mar 16, 2015

uughh..for God's sake Samsung stop!..just stop!...wait till next year, get better specs then release your mid range and low end devices in a comprehensive manner

6. medtxa

Posts: 1655; Member since: Jun 02, 2014

They tried to make money. So deal with it.

8. Clars123

Posts: 1073; Member since: Mar 16, 2015

well wouldnt they make more money with a better approach?

9. medtxa

Posts: 1655; Member since: Jun 02, 2014

you think make only one or fewer model for each class is good strategy for samsung? no. I trust samsung marketing decision can make the best profit for them..at least they know better than a noob opinions.

2. TyrionLannister unregistered

Not bad. Not bad at all. This seems a little better than the moto E LTE and priced very similarly. Off-topic: PA, I'm getting redirected to an ad page of hero motocorp. Please take some action.

3. aba71983

Posts: 807; Member since: Jul 24, 2014

This is what I'm talking about. J1, J2, J5, J7, J3 and soon J4, J8 On5, On7 and soon On1, On2, On3, On4, On8

4. aba71983

Posts: 807; Member since: Jul 24, 2014

And soon..... Off1, Off2, Off3, Off4, Off5, Off7, Off8

5. superkuiken

Posts: 168; Member since: Mar 24, 2013

So basically a Galaxy A5?

7. Hexa-core

Posts: 2131; Member since: Aug 11, 2015

No! A5 is superior

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.