Refurbished iPhone 14 Pro from $461

Updated : Mar 27, 2015, 4:07 AM

Samsung Galaxy Ace

Full Specifications

This device is also known as Samsung GT-S5830, Samsung S5830

6.5

Read Samsung Galaxy Ace Review

7.8

Read All User Reviews (19)

I want it 39 users

I have it 75 users

I had it 104 users

Deals

$949

Popular Comparisons

The Samsung Galaxy Ace is most commonly compared with these phones:

Design
Dimensions	4.43 x 2.36 x 0.45 inches 112.4 x 59.9 x 11.5 mm
Weight	3.99 oz (113.0 g)
Keys	Left: Volume control; Right: Lock/Unlock key

Display
Size	3.5-inch
Resolution	480x320px, 165 PPI
Technology	TFT
Screen-to-body	54.08 %
Features	Proximity sensor, Scratch-resistant glass (Corning Gorilla Glass)

Hardware
System chip	Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227
Processor	Single core 800 MHz ARM11
GPU	Adreno 200
Internal storage	0.158GB
Storage expansion	microSDHC up to 32 GB
OS	Android (2.3, 2.2)

Battery
Capacity	1350 mAh
Type	Li - Ion

Camera
Rear	Single camera
Main camera	5 MP (Autofocus)
Flash	LED
Video recording	320x240 (QVGA) (20 fps)

Connectivity & Features
Bluetooth	3.0
Wi-Fi	802.11 b,g,n
USB	microUSB, USB 2.0
Location	A-GPS
Sensors	Accelerometer, Compass
Other	Computer sync, OTA sync

Multimedia
Headphones	3.5mm jack
Speakers	Earpiece, Loudspeaker
Features	Album art cover, Background playback
Screen mirroring	DLNA
Radio	FM, Stereo, RDS

Cellular
3G	Bands 8(900), 1(2100)
Data Speed	HSDPA 7.2 Mbit/s, UMTS

Phone Features
Notifications	Haptic feedback, Music ringtones (MP3), Polyphonic ringtones, Vibration, Flight mode, Silent mode, Speakerphone
Other features	Voice recording

Regulatory Approval
FCC approval	Date approved: Dec 08, 2010 FCC ID value: A3LGTS5830
Measured SAR	Head: 0.69 W/kg Measured in: 1900 MHz Body: 1.31 W/kg Measured in: 1900 MHz
EU SAR	Head: 0.84 W/kg
This device has different variants: View all

Availability
Officially announced	Jan 26, 2011

Despite our efforts to provide full and correct Samsung Galaxy Ace specifications, there is always a possibility of admitting a mistake. If you see any wrong or incomplete data, please

LET US KNOW.

If you are interested in using our specs commercially, check out our Phone specs database licensing page.

Alternative variants

Differences from the main variant:
FCC approval	Date approved: Nov 16, 2011 FCC ID value: A3LGTS5830I
Measured SAR	Head: 0.79 W/kg Body: 0.62 W/kg

News

Android 4.1 Jelly Bean is already out on the Galaxy Nexus, but other phone are still waiting for manufacturers to do the work and update their handsets to the newest version of Android. What’s worse is that some handset will never officially get upda...

Samsung Galaxy Ace, Gio get CyanogenMod10 ROMs despite their older chips

Earlier this year, we reported that more than 100 million apps had been downloaded from Samsung Apps. Now, Samsung is giving away up to 16 free apps from the web site to users of certain Samsung Galaxy devices. The games include such titles as Air Pe...

Samsung giving away up to 16 free apps from its store to selected GALAXY users

The unofficial Gingerbread ROM for the Samsung Galaxy Ace leaked nearly three months ago, but it's only now that Samsung has pushed the official update through Kies in select regions. The first countries to benefit from Samsung's update are Russia an...

Samsung Galaxy Ace Gingerbread update arrives

Not something you’d expect to find a big company like Samsung to focus on meticulously, especially when it has so many other top shelf devices to bring up to spec, but owners of the Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 might be surprised to find a leak Gingerbre...

Pre-release Gingerbread ROM for the Samsung Galaxy Ace is leaked

Links

Overall User Rating

(19 reviews)

7.8

Build quality

8.1

Camera quality

7.9

Performance

7.8

Display

7.8

Battery life and charging

6.3

Satori22

Arena Apprentice

Not worth it

Posted: Aug 21, 2014, 5:44 PM

Phone owned for more than a year

If you're looking for a low budget phone i guess it could be it. But it's absolutely laughable internal space makes it not even worth calling a smartphone. Use it to make calls and a little bit of net browsing, forget about any other app.

megan2510

Arena Apprentice

I don't recommend this phone.

Posted: Aug 07, 2014, 5:36 AM

Phone owned for less than a year

A slow, low quality handset incapable of doing what most phones can do. It's features are average at best and half of them don't even work. A ridiculous 1.9GB memory that I filled within a month. Bad for gaming and social networking.

Build quality

Camera quality

Performance

Display

Battery life and charging

What I like

Good camera, okay for everyday usage.

What I don't like

Bad for internet, terribly slow, glitchy, laggy and a real pain to own.

Did you find this review helpful?

Helpful

Unhelpful

Report

2 out of 2 people found this helpful.

StewieMonSta

Arena Apprentice

Slow battery life is atrocious

Posted: Mar 23, 2014, 9:25 AM

Phone owned for more than a year

*Don't own this phone anymore*

Build quality is okay but I got some marks on it after just light use even on the screen and I never dropped it but the plastic back cover is flawless, paint on the side of the device started to tear away. Reception good, call quality good. Internet was so laggy almost unusable. Music app is very basic but the speaker is okay and it has FM Radio. Camera is great for photos and video recording sucks (240p). It's very laggy and runs an old version of android. Keyboard is fine and if you don;t like it you can download more. Large selection of apps. Display is poor but it's not terrible. Battery is just unbelievable it stays on 100% for 5 mins and then it goes down and after about 15-20mins it goes out. If you had 100% charge overnight and left it without using it it would be 0% by the morning. Gaming is very laggy even on games like fruit ninja and angry birds but doodle jump is fine.

Build quality

Camera quality

Performance

Display

Battery life and charging

What I like