T-Mobile's CTO: Unlocked Apple iPhone 4S downloads 70% faster over T-Mobile than on AT&T
23 such areas covering over 100 million people. The new metro areas upgraded on Thursday involve Chicago, including the surrounding areas of: Aurora, Berwyn, Chicago Heights, Cicero, Des Plaines, Downers Grove, Evanston, Evergreen Park, Naperville, Oak Park, Schaumburg, Wilmette and Winnetka; Reno, Nevada; Sacramento, California., including the surrounding areas of: Antelope, Citrus Heights, Elk Grove, Fair Oaks, Folsom, Loomis, North Highlands, Rancho Cordova, Rio Linda, Rocklin, Roseville, Vacaville and West Sacramento; Fresno, Califdornia; and Southern California, including: Alhambra, Anaheim, Claremont, Culver City, El Monte, Encino, Garden Grove, Granada Hills, Inglewood, Irvine, La Crescenta, Laguna Niguel, Monrovia, Monterey Park, Newport Beach, North Hills, North Hollywood, Paramount, Pasadena, Redlands, Reseda, Rosemead, Santa Ana, San Fernando, San Gabriel, Santa Monica, South El Monte, Temple City, Torrance, Upland, Valley Village, Van Nuys, Westminster and Wilmington.
T-Mobile customers in those areas, besides being able to run an unlocked Apple iPhone over the network using the Nationwide Unlimited plan, will also notice faster data speeds,improved signal strength and better indoor coverage.
source: T-Mobile via Engadget
1. D.Aceveda posted on 14 Dec 2012, 03:41 0 1
So stupid. Instead of trying to create new networks to support the iPhones current banding how about you give into Apples BS and pay them however much money they want so they can release a NEW iPhone that supports the 1700mhz band so that way it can run on CURRENT 4G COVERAGE!!
Whats the point of carrying the iPhone if it only works in select markets? If that's the case don't bother carrying it at all. Just my opinion.
3. Lboogey6 posted on 14 Dec 2012, 06:17 1 1
i like this guy hes smart..
orrr they could be planning out the network for the new iphone and with the merger with metro its already getting ready for the the 5 and any other new products and in the mean time if you live in those areas you can take advantage of the speed and cost savings while the carrier isn't selling the phone until next year when everything will be compatible ....
but youre right take a huge loss weigh down the network and make no profit kinda the success of sprint i agree
5. gwuhua1984 posted on 14 Dec 2012, 12:40 0 1
Apple will not release an iPhone to be used on 1700mhz. It's not worth their effort. 1900mhz is widely used worldwide, the only 1700mhz that will be put on iPhones are LTE bands. T-Mobile is doing the right thing, refarming 1900mhz to support all gsm phones and upgrading 1700mhz to LTE. Just a note, T-Mo 4G is really just upgraded 3G, fast enough to be called 4G.
6. D.Aceveda posted on 14 Dec 2012, 14:11 0 1
Really? Apparently you've never heard of a pentaband phone.
8. gwuhua1984 posted on 14 Dec 2012, 17:04 0 1
LOL, be real, do you really think Apple will spend the extra money on creating a pentaband phone while the world is migrating from 3G/3.5G data to LTE, that's including T-Mobile. Out of all of the existing unlocked GSM phones being used on T-Mobile, how many are using 1700mhz? how many are pentaband that are NOT from T-Mobile? It make sense to have quad band on GSM because it's using for voice and text. T-Mobile's the 4th largest carrier behind Sprint and has been losing contract customers and the prepaid customers that they're gaining can't even cover the loss, you seriously think T-Mobile will have an agreement with Apple just to have an iPhone on 1700mhz band to put themselves in the reds further worse than Sprint? Not to mention most of the 1700mhz bands will eventually be used for LTE and probably cannot be used as HSDPA?
You're not thinking long term.
1900mhz will need to be refarmed eventually, do it early and go straight to LTE+ is less costly than signing a contract with Apple for a 1700mhz HSDPA iPhone then refarm 1900mhz and go to LTE+.
9. D.Aceveda posted on 14 Dec 2012, 18:53 0 1
Too long; Didn't read
10. gwuhua1984 posted on 14 Dec 2012, 19:14 0 1
LOL, you should go/stay with AT&T
11. D.Aceveda posted on 14 Dec 2012, 19:26 1 0
LOL? Why would I? AT&T sucks
12. gwuhua1984 posted on 14 Dec 2012, 19:34 0 1
You finally said something intelligent. Congrats! Almost thought you couldn't keep an intelligent conversation. Good for you. Thumb up!
13. D.Aceveda posted on 14 Dec 2012, 19:56 0 0
And you finally said something that isn't meaningless crap. Way to go little guy:D
4. -box- posted on 14 Dec 2012, 07:50 0 0
Yay if it is true, I guess? They're both HSPA+, and the 4S tops at 14.4Mbps (to my knowledge), so if the only differential is throughput or congestion, they should be equal.
7. Lboogey6 posted on 14 Dec 2012, 15:53 0 0
come on guy upgraded 3g doing the same speed bfd if it reaches the speed that lte in the states is getting then give it up being a tech nerd in reality means nothing you label it what you want but a spade is a spade. but yes they won't make the phone for that but if you have the phone already and don't want to spend the money to get the new phone in the future lets not forget apple doesn't really do much different with their devices