Spectrum transfer from AT&T to T-Mobile approved by FCC
1. gwuhua1984 (Posts: 1237; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)
This is a really good news for T-Mo customers. Now they just need to get their phone lineup on track, start announcing and selling some jaw dropping phones before AT&T and etc does.
3. gwuhua1984 (Posts: 1237; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)
Let's say if you're looking for a phone... would you go for the One S for $199 or One X from AT&T for $149? and which one would you want more?
5. torr310 (Posts: 537; Member since: 27 Oct 2011)
you need to pay more for the phones without contracts. I actually like the contracts because I won't switch the carrier and I also like to get the discount/free phones. But hope there will be 1-year contract available.
6. remixfa (Posts: 14253; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
you dont get a discount/free phone. you just think you do
you would rather spend 149 and pay 130 a month for service instead of spending 500 and paying 60 for service.. with a wider 4g network that blazing fast.
That is exactly why carriers wont ever fully get off of that system. Think it through.. think how much more money you are paying for 2 years of service to get that "free" phone.
9. Fluxman (Posts: 51; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)
boy, those carriers got you good if you think you are getting a discount/free phone. I would argue that over the contract term, the full price phone saves you way more money.
14. georgiaboyz (Posts: 11; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
These two previous comments crack me up...whether you pay full price for a phone or sign a contract and get the phone susidized, the cost of the monthly service is the exact same, assuming you are talking about the different buying options while considering the same carrier in both situations. And you think you are sooooo smart phone paying for phones outright and not signing a contract, BUT i hate to tell you...Wait for it...paying the disconnection fee+the price of a subsidized phone is STILL (9/10 times) cheaper then buying a phone outright. The funniest part is that ALL these people that don't wat to sign a "BIG BAD" contract have been with the same carriers for multiple years and aren't going anywhere. So why not just sign the contract and see if you like the carrier before you front the extra $300-$500, just to find out they aren't as scary and crooked as all these commitment phobic people are telling you.
7. networkdood (Posts: 6329; Member since: 31 Mar 2010)
Wow, the FCC finally approved something...amazing!!
8. remixfa (Posts: 14253; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
well, all my jailbroken iphone customers are gonna be ecstatic. Jacksonville's getting some of that 3g spectrum.
NOW IF ONLY I COULD WIN THAT SGS2 CONTEST, I COULD TAKE FULL ADVANTAGE OF THE NEW SPECTRUM!!! :) :) :)
10. castro08 (Posts: 1; Member since: 25 Apr 2012)
I have a question. Does this help us now? For example, will it give us greater coverage with faster speeds in more places, or does this only matter for the future, or both?
11. remixfa (Posts: 14253; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
as soon as they do whatever they need to do to make it work on Tmobile, it will help out in the places its added. It also carries the added benefit of being compatible with ATT's 3g/4g in those areas so people with unlocked iphones will finally get off EDGE service. lol
12. Forsaken77 (Posts: 552; Member since: 09 Jun 2011)
I don't understand why AT&T had to pay them anything at all. The deal going bust wasn't AT&T's fault. The grubby government stepped in where they don't belong. That's out of their control. I guess some stupid lawyer is looking for a new job now for not adding that provision into the contract. Seems like a really stupid over sight.
13. JGuinan007 (Posts: 647; Member since: 19 May 2011)
When is Comcast or Apple or Google going to buy T-mo and run the company properly so they can use this spectrum properly?