x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Samsung ATIV Q AnTuTu score shatters all records: Core i5 benchmarked

Samsung ATIV Q AnTuTu score shatters all records: Core i5 benchmarked

Posted: , by Victor H.

Tags :

Samsung ATIV Q AnTuTu score shatters all records: Core i5 benchmarked
The Samsung ATIV Q notebook/convertible shocked us with the most detailed screen we’ve ever screen on such a device, and with the fact that it runs both Windows 8 and Android in a dual-boot configuration. 

The device is - of course - powered by an Intel Core series chip and it’s the Core i5-4200U with Intel HD 4400 integrated graphics. And it runs Android. You know what this means?

Samsung ATIV Q AnTuTu score shatters all records: Core i5 benchmarked
That’s right, you can run standard Android benchmarks and compare the performance of an Intel Core chip against that of an ARM-based one like the upcoming Snapdragon 800.

Of course, the Intel Core i5 with 4GB of RAM is much faster (and power-hungrier), but how much exactly? We’ll let the AnTuTu score explain it all: 54 861.

In contrast, rumored Snapdragon 800 devices have leaked out scoring around 33 000 points. That means the Core i5 chip is around 60% faster.

There is little comparison between a full-fledged 13.3-inch laptop/convertible with a 1.6GHz quad dual-core Core i5 like the Samsung Ativ Q with its resolution of 3200 x 1800 pixels and Android tablets, but it’s useful for taking things into context. The Ativ Q was announced on June 20th and should be coming to stores soon bringing typical Samsung functionality like the S Pen and SideSync.

source: ePrice

52 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 24 Jun 2013, 07:38 10

1. Cesar (Posts: 139; Member since: 16 Aug 2012)


OMG!!! :O

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 08:02 13

14. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4857; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


YES Intel's Core i series are DESKTOP processors, now put those BEASTS on a mobile device like a tablet that happens to ALSO run Android & you have simply the BEST performance you could EVER imagine.

Now what about a quad-core Core i7? lol

+1

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 09:05 4

27. dan86 (Posts: 298; Member since: 17 Mar 2012)


Expect Galaxy Note IV.

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 10:08 1

34. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4857; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


That would be so EPIC!

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 16:25

49. Tsoliades (Posts: 228; Member since: 22 Dec 2012)


I just wish this thing had a front-facing camera. That pretty much ruins it for me. :/

posted on 17 Jul 2013, 03:59

54. abdane (Posts: 494; Member since: 07 Oct 2011)


it does have a front-facing camera !!!

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 08:54 1

24. amansingal14 (Posts: 309; Member since: 08 Sep 2012)


I do think that the instructions set is different for Intel (x86) and Snapdragon(ARM). So it means that the i5 is capable of much more.

However, if these are scores wrt to x86, then I am highly dissapointed.

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 07:39 14

2. ihatesmartphone (unregistered)


OOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHAT A BEAST!!

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 09:30 3

31. hung2900 (Posts: 956; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)


Look closer, we can see the cpu benchmark is about 5 times bẻtter than S4 and 6-7 times better than One

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 11:57

41. akki20892 (Posts: 3901; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)


when i see sammy product it always have antutu score report article. ?

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 07:41 5

3. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


Oh my.

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 12:05 1

42. Wiki_jaan (Posts: 704; Member since: 24 Jun 2012)


yupe............ i know .... samsung shuda named it Samsung Galaxy Ativ

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 07:41 6

4. _Bone_ (Posts: 2155; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


Whoa! And that's on pre-release firmware. It'll easily go over 60k. And remember, it's supposed to be Android emulated on W8, but Sammy found a way for seamless x86 implementation, and someone needs to tell me HOW.

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 07:42 6

5. xDrizzyXx (Posts: 64; Member since: 28 Jun 2011)


Holy crap that's insane! Now imagine if it had an i7 :o

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 07:52

10. _Bone_ (Posts: 2155; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


But it packs the expected power/consumption champion, the Haswell i5 processor. it is expected to perform quite well while blowing everything away in battery life, just see how it (albeit an even more efficient model) does in the new MacBook Air.

.http://www.anandtech.com/show/7085/the-2013-macbo​ok-air-review-13inch

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 10:26

36. Rehankhan (Posts: 323; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)


umm more logical cores?

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 07:43 5

6. jaytai0106 (Posts: 1888; Member since: 30 Mar 2011)


I'm not surprised. It has i5 CPU which is being used on a lot of computer now. CPU for smartphone just isn't up to par with the computer CPU just yet but I hope they will one day :D

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 07:50 2

8. SonyXperiaNexus (Posts: 374; Member since: 01 Oct 2012)


exactly, if you run android on a gaming pc and benchmark it, results would be out of this planet.

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 07:55 2

12. _Bone_ (Posts: 2155; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


Yes but it IS a fully working Android tablet among many things, so it is a real performance of a real device with unreal benchmarks.

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 07:46 3

7. TylerGrunter (Posts: 1533; Member since: 16 Feb 2012)


I must say I was expecting a bigger difference. So how near are the most powerful mobile SoCs from an i3 then?
And one important correction> The Samsung ATIV Q uses and i5-4200U, which is DUAL CORE with hyperthreading. Not a quad core as Victor mentioned.

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 09:00

25. Shubham412302 (Posts: 432; Member since: 09 Nov 2011)


and its just 1.6ghz and not 3+ghz

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 07:51 1

9. whoyton2 (banned) (Posts: 142; Member since: 19 Jun 2013)


Holy moly well done sammy!!,

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 07:52 1

11. LukeTT (Posts: 13; Member since: 03 May 2013)


Not surprised considering that it sports Intel's quad core i5 chip. These chips were meant to be run on PCs and laptops.

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 08:11 1

18. _Bone_ (Posts: 2155; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


And now they run an Android tablet. :)

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 08:02

13. speckledapple (Posts: 892; Member since: 29 Sep 2011)


Yes this device is exactly what some of us has been wanting for what seems like ages. I am glad at least one manu has figured that out and made it look attractive as well.

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 08:24

20. _Bone_ (Posts: 2155; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


It runs stock Android too! Everything is place here, it has the power-friendly Haswell chip, 1-second switch between OSs with you apps listed among Windows programs, tablet, tablet-stand, laptop modes, digitizer with S-pen, EPIC 6-megapixel screen, microSD slot. Now it needs to support Sammy's Smart Hub tech to stream your TV on your laptop.

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 08:02 2

15. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)


What dafuq Samsung?! Am I dreaming?! 54 861?!
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 10:12 3

35. FlushGordon (unregistered)


You're a freaking 14 year old toddler. ...where the hell are you supposed to get that money? Assuming that it is priced north of $1000???

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 08:08

16. mottykels (Posts: 385; Member since: 15 May 2013)


WTF!!! Alien!!!

posted on 24 Jun 2013, 08:23 2

19. PhansMuneeb (Posts: 371; Member since: 28 Jan 2012)


S800 looks a child...

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories