Samsung ATIV Q AnTuTu score shatters all records: Core i5 benchmarked
Of course, the Intel Core i5 with 4GB of RAM is much faster (and power-hungrier), but how much exactly? We’ll let the AnTuTu score explain it all: 54 861.
In contrast, rumored Snapdragon 800 devices have leaked out scoring around 33 000 points. That means the Core i5 chip is around 60% faster.
There is little comparison between a full-fledged 13.3-inch laptop/convertible with a 1.6GHz quad dual-core Core i5 like the Samsung Ativ Q with its resolution of 3200 x 1800 pixels and Android tablets, but it’s useful for taking things into context. The Ativ Q was announced on June 20th and should be coming to stores soon bringing typical Samsung functionality like the S Pen and SideSync.
14. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4234; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)
YES Intel's Core i series are DESKTOP processors, now put those BEASTS on a mobile device like a tablet that happens to ALSO run Android & you have simply the BEST performance you could EVER imagine.
Now what about a quad-core Core i7? lol
49. Tsoliades (Posts: 213; Member since: 22 Dec 2012)
I just wish this thing had a front-facing camera. That pretty much ruins it for me. :/
24. amansingal14 (Posts: 290; Member since: 08 Sep 2012)
I do think that the instructions set is different for Intel (x86) and Snapdragon(ARM). So it means that the i5 is capable of much more.
However, if these are scores wrt to x86, then I am highly dissapointed.
2. ihatesmartphone (unregistered)
WHAT A BEAST!!
31. hung2900 (Posts: 805; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)
Look closer, we can see the cpu benchmark is about 5 times bẻtter than S4 and 6-7 times better than One
41. akki20892 (Posts: 3571; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
when i see sammy product it always have antutu score report article. ?
42. Wiki_jaan (Posts: 703; Member since: 24 Jun 2012)
yupe............ i know .... samsung shuda named it Samsung Galaxy Ativ
4. _Bone_ (Posts: 2135; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
Whoa! And that's on pre-release firmware. It'll easily go over 60k. And remember, it's supposed to be Android emulated on W8, but Sammy found a way for seamless x86 implementation, and someone needs to tell me HOW.
5. xDrizzyXx (Posts: 62; Member since: 28 Jun 2011)
Holy crap that's insane! Now imagine if it had an i7 :o
10. _Bone_ (Posts: 2135; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
But it packs the expected power/consumption champion, the Haswell i5 processor. it is expected to perform quite well while blowing everything away in battery life, just see how it (albeit an even more efficient model) does in the new MacBook Air.
6. jaytai0106 (Posts: 1328; Member since: 30 Mar 2011)
I'm not surprised. It has i5 CPU which is being used on a lot of computer now. CPU for smartphone just isn't up to par with the computer CPU just yet but I hope they will one day :D
8. SonyXperiaNexus (Posts: 374; Member since: 01 Oct 2012)
exactly, if you run android on a gaming pc and benchmark it, results would be out of this planet.
12. _Bone_ (Posts: 2135; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
Yes but it IS a fully working Android tablet among many things, so it is a real performance of a real device with unreal benchmarks.
7. TylerGrunter (Posts: 1005; Member since: 16 Feb 2012)
I must say I was expecting a bigger difference. So how near are the most powerful mobile SoCs from an i3 then?
And one important correction> The Samsung ATIV Q uses and i5-4200U, which is DUAL CORE with hyperthreading. Not a quad core as Victor mentioned.
11. LukeTT (Posts: 13; Member since: 03 May 2013)
Not surprised considering that it sports Intel's quad core i5 chip. These chips were meant to be run on PCs and laptops.
13. speckledapple (Posts: 879; Member since: 29 Sep 2011)
Yes this device is exactly what some of us has been wanting for what seems like ages. I am glad at least one manu has figured that out and made it look attractive as well.
20. _Bone_ (Posts: 2135; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
It runs stock Android too! Everything is place here, it has the power-friendly Haswell chip, 1-second switch between OSs with you apps listed among Windows programs, tablet, tablet-stand, laptop modes, digitizer with S-pen, EPIC 6-megapixel screen, microSD slot. Now it needs to support Sammy's Smart Hub tech to stream your TV on your laptop.
15. xperiaDROID (Posts: 5577; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
What dafuq Samsung?! Am I dreaming?! 54 861?!
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY!
35. FlushGordon (unregistered)
You're a freaking 14 year old toddler. ...where the hell are you supposed to get that money? Assuming that it is priced north of $1000???
22. gaurang (Posts: 94; Member since: 16 Nov 2012)
but the instruction set is different for x86 (core i5) and arm..so technically its much faster than the what the benchmark shows
28. _Bone_ (Posts: 2135; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
Yup. Dunno how Sammy emulates Android so well on x86, but this is HUGE for the platform, cause it opens the door for all sorts of high-end Android devices. This tablet laughs all over the iPads too, and they are pretty powerful.
23. Kevinphantom (Posts: 82; Member since: 17 Jun 2013)
S800 gets 16000 and intel Haswell 54000 holy crap
26. bigstrudel (Posts: 518; Member since: 20 Aug 2012)
Real life performance will be no different than any other flagship chip set. The Apple A6, snapdragon Pro and 600 all run every task without hesitation and without lag.
29. Taters (Posts: 3291; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
Yeah, it should be higher. It is like comparing a desktop cpu to an IBM super computer built to run multiple servers and play chess. Well, maybe not that lopsided but it should be more than not even double the S800. It should be like 5 times at least.
30. Pedro0x (Posts: 271; Member since: 19 Oct 2012)
55000 on antutu with a 15W chip is so poor, 3W(probably) Snapdragon 800 have around 30000. But maybe benchmark isn´t yet optimized for this intel processor.
If Intel doesn´t do something, ARM will destroy it.
32. Paradox (Posts: 123; Member since: 08 Aug 2012)
I don't know why everybody is getting so excited. The power consumption on the i5 is no doubt much higher. The aim with the snapdragon 800 is to reduce power consumption and increase speed.
33. FlushGordon (unregistered)
Pricetag? Of course it will shatter everything
37. hisaak (Posts: 19; Member since: 12 Apr 2013)
Now every child can think about "OMG, imagine what would Intel Xeon score?!"
Seriously, what is the point of this article? To say that x-times more expensive and power hungry CPU is powerful than the others designed for completely different purposes? By the way, I'm only surprised that i5 was ONLY 60 % faster than Snapdragon. If you asked me before, I would guess way bigger performance difference.
38. ikezor (Posts: 1; Member since: 24 Jun 2013)
According to Anandtech the Android OS is actually running in VM environment on top of Windows 8.Does it have anything to do with or against the score?
39. androidfanboy (Posts: 162; Member since: 24 Jun 2013)
So will the intel i5 make android as smooth as ios?
43. ZeroCide (Posts: 696; Member since: 09 Jan 2013)
this is thy x86 is better. Can't wait for intels new mobile set. I want to see what those things bench at.
44. chrisbeto10 (Posts: 6; Member since: 20 Sep 2012)
i would like to see stock jelly bean on a quad core i7 clocked a 3 Ghz
46. Topcat488 (Posts: 1164; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
YYYYEEEAAAhhh... This has got to be the BEST TAB/Notebook on the market of all time!!! Windows and Android together in one at the same time flawlessly... What what! When will a phablet edition come?
48. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5621; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)
the ARM SoC's don't do so bad in comparison to a modern Core series Processor. o:
50. Techboi (Posts: 84; Member since: 20 Sep 2012)
Why are people surprised by this really smh
51. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 3034; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)
Hmm I have always wanted to play Skyrim on a tablet, lol
53. adrianzka (Posts: 25; Member since: 25 Apr 2013)
It looks like antutu is not counting the 3d graphics. Might be since it's intergrated or something