Updated : Mar 27, 2015, 4:07 AM

Nokia 500

Full Specifications

This device is also known as Nokia Fate

7.5

Read Nokia 500 Review

7.6

Read All User Reviews (13)

I want it 20 users

I have it 19 users

I had it 10 users

Popular Comparisons

The Nokia 500 is most commonly compared with these phones:

Design
Dimensions	4.38 x 2.12 x 0.56 inches 111.3 x 53.8 x 14.1 mm
Weight	3.28 oz (93.0 g)
Keys	Right: Volume control, Lock/Unlock key
Colors	Black, Purple, Orange, Green, Blue, Gray

Display
Size	3.2-inch
Resolution	640x360px, 229 PPI
Technology	TFT
Screen-to-body	47.12 %
Colors	16 777 216
Features	Ambient light sensor, Proximity sensor

Hardware
Processor	Single core 1000 MHz ARM11
RAM	0.25GBROM: 512 MB
Internal storage	2GB
Storage expansion	microSDHC up to 32 GB
OS	Symbian (Belle, Anna)

Battery
Capacity	1110 mAh
Type	Li - Ion

Camera
Rear	Single camera
Main camera	5 MP
Video recording	640x480 (VGA) (15 fps) Video calling

Connectivity & Features
Bluetooth	2.1, Yes
WLAN	802.11 b,g
USB	microUSB, USB 2.0
Location	GPS, A-GPS
Sensors	Accelerometer, Compass
Other	Tethering, Computer sync, OTA sync

Multimedia
Headphones	3.5mm jack
Features	Album art cover
Radio	FM, Stereo, RDS

Cellular
3G	Bands 5(850), 8(900), 4(1700/2100), 2(1900), 1(2100)
Data Speed	HSDPA 14.4 Mbit/s, UMTS, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s

Phone Features
Notifications	Music ringtones (MP3), Polyphonic ringtones, Vibration, Phone profiles, Flight mode, Silent mode, Speakerphone
Other features	Voice dialing, Voice commands, Voice recording

Regulatory Approval
FCC approval	Date approved: Jul 28, 2011 FCC ID value: QTKRM-750
Measured SAR	Head: 1.43 W/kg Measured in: 850 MHz Body: 1.31 W/kg Measured in: 850 MHz

Availability
Officially announced	Aug 02, 2011

Despite our efforts to provide full and correct Nokia 500 specifications, there is always a possibility of admitting a mistake. If you see any wrong or incomplete data, please

LET US KNOW.

If you are interested in using our specs commercially, check out our Phone specs database licensing page.

News

The Nokia Belle update has graced nearly all of Nokia’s Symbian^3 lineup with only one exception - the Nokia 500. Today, the Finns have fixed that by making the latest update available to Nokia 500 owners. So, this makes now the best time to check fo...

Remember those photos from not long ago that allegedly represented a leaked Nokia roadmap? The images shed some light on a quartet of mid-range, Symbian-powered Nokia smartphones that were supposedly scheduled to see the light of day in the third qua...

Nokia 500 is now official; runs Symbian Anna and ticks at 1GHz

We knew Nokia plans to name each Symbian iteration from now on with a woman's name alphabetically - Anna, Belle, and so on, but nothing was said about the handsets receiving girly names themselves. Nokia's upcoming Symbian lineup includes four device...

Nokia's new Symbian lineup might arrive in Q3: 1GHz CPUs and nHD displays

Links

Overall User Rating

(13 reviews)

7.6

Build quality

Camera quality

6.4

Performance

7.8

Display

8.1

Battery life and charging

6.4

Sailesh [deleted]

A good phone, but fails to compete with the phones of the same price group!

Posted: Dec 12, 2013, 12:08 AM

Phone owned for more than a year

This phone is robust and feels great in the hand, but fails to compete with the other phones which fall in the same Price Group. Excellent for simple use but not for the people who love to MultiTask. Preserving the "Nokia Built", drop it a hundred times but it wont give up. Not a phone for Social Media Enthusiasts. The Operating System fails to compete with the Windows and the Android OS.

PorkyBurger

Arena Apprentice

Nokia 500

Posted: May 19, 2013, 10:59 AM

Phone owned for less than a year

I am dissapointed with build quality of the phone. I have always trusted Nokia, for it's amazing build quality, but this time I don't. Though it has a 1Ghz ARM11 processor, its rather slow than speedy, especially when you update it to Nokia Belle Refresh.

Build quality

Camera quality

Performance

Display

Battery life and charging

What I like

Sharp display.
Nice call quality.
Nice design, changable battery covers.

What I don't like

Poor build quality, no screen protection.
Small display, aspect ratio not suited for such small screens.
Battery lasts a day.
Camera's quality is dissapointing.
Poor recording for a 5MP camera.
Web on a stock browser is dissapointing, laggy.
No 3D GPU. Many elements in OS are laggy, because of it.
Death-grips in reception.

Did you find this review helpful?

Helpful

Unhelpful

2 out of 3 people found this helpful.

wpymes

Arena Apprentice

MY FIRST SMARTPHONE: Good! but ready to move on and up!

Edited: May 09, 2013, 3:35 AM

Phone owned for less than a year

I loved its price, the size, the screen resolution, call quality and fast processing. I hated the unconfortable size of the screen for typing, the camera without autofocus (useless for scanning documents), the very short battery life, the limited apps for Symbian Belle. I keep it in a soft case to avoid risk scratching or falls and It does feel cheap and squeaky when pressed!