Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo Review
The Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo is as low as you can go with brand name Android smartphones. The super affordable, the ultra low end, call it as you wish, but can Android still look and work good on such a tiny and cheap phone?
The Galaxy Pocket Neo offers a small 3-inch display, Android 4.1 Jelly Bean with TouchWiz on top, and it comes in both a single and dual SIM versions (we have the single SIM one for review). Compact and plastic, it looks more like a kid’s toy phone rather than a real gadget, but it is. It’s also all about compromise, but is its price low enough to justify this? Let’s explore.
In the box:
- User Manual
- Wall Charger
The Galaxy Pocket Neo (now, that’s a mouthful) is the usual plastic-not-so-fantastic Samsung affair. And you guessed it right - it looks like any other Samsung Android phone in the past two years or so.
105 x 57.8 x 11.8 mm
3.55 oz (100 g)
102.6 x 61.1 x 11.9 mm
3.88 oz (110 g)
110.1 x 59.0 x 12.25 mm
3.77 oz (107 g)
109.4 x 58.6 x 12.5 mm
3.95 oz (112 g)
Power key (right)
Volume rocker (left)
3.5mm jack (top)
microUSB port (bottom)
The sides of the Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo
More popular slideshows
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 2
14 Oct 2013, 05:28
LG G Pro 2 Review
04 Mar 2014, 09:00
Apple iPhone 5s vs Samsung Galaxy S4
27 Sep 2013, 05:59
Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One
26 Mar 2013, 06:51
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Samsung Galaxy S4
15 Oct 2013, 05:44
Google Nexus 5 vs LG G2
11 Nov 2013, 06:01
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact Review
23 Jan 2014, 09:22
Apple iPad Air vs Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition
16 Nov 2013, 04:22
The 3-inch LCD display does not impress in any way. The low resolution (240 x 320 pixels, or 133ppi) means you can see icons’ jagged edges and the images look pixelized.
Color reproduction alone is accurate, but you’ll have trouble seeing what’s on the screen in the outdoors, where maximum brightness is of crucial importance. Another niggle is the lack of ambient light sensor. This means the screen won’t automatically adjust its brightness depending on your settings, and that’s annoying. Luckily, you can quickly manually change brightness with the slider built right in the notification shade. The display lacks oleophobic coating that would repel dirt and smudges, so you’d have to wipe the screen fairly often to keep it clean. Viewing angles are below average and you’d notice colors fade out as you tilt the device.
We ought to say a couple of words about the sheer size of this 3 inch display and how it relates to the overall usability of the device. Using Android on tiny devices like this becomes a real pain. Icons and buttons are shrinked to a size too small for the fingers of an average adult person, you’d often find yourselves mistapping and this makes even basic tasks a challenge. While we don’t usually judge a device for its size, this is one of the extreme cases where a phone feels too small for convenient use, take this into account.
1. felisberto (Posts: 32; Member since: 11 Feb 2013)
Too small, nobody gonna buy this. The smarphone ideal size is over 5 inch.
10. baraa (Posts: 2; Member since: 02 Jan 2014)
i bought it for my second phone when my main Lumia 920 ran out of battery or sent for service. Serves the purpose to call and receive msg, even for mobile IM like Whatsapp and WeChat (the reason why I get a second smartphone). But terribly slow for social media apps like FB, Instagram, even Twitter. Not recommended if you want this phone as your main smartphone. Of course if you just want basic phone for call and SMS, you could better use cheaper phone, not this Android platform.
2. josephnero (Posts: 194; Member since: 16 Nov 2011)
and people used o say 3.5 is big enough. for me between 4.5 and 5.2 is fine
4. oldmandaddy (Posts: 64; Member since: 01 May 2010)
Another Samsung 's crappy phones on the markets.
5. DukeX (Posts: 327; Member since: 28 Aug 2013)
More like another one of Samsungs phones not many will buy. Most other samsung phones sell well for good reason. But no one asked you to say anything about it being crappy.
7. kindlefireowner (Posts: 275; Member since: 05 Dec 2011)
Nokia Lumia 520 is what a entry level smartphone should be. Samsung should take the Galaxy name off of these garbage entry level smartphones. There is nothing Galaxy about this phone.
8. vikas.rrr (Posts: 9; Member since: 20 Aug 2013)
Agreed that about half of the galaxy phone are crappy,who don't live up to the galaxy brand. Heck even some Flagship don't do justice to their name(read S4 mini,S3 mini).Maybe they are starting to take everyone for granted.And yeah lumia 520 seems like what an entry level smart-phone should be(in current times),though they could have made the display of the lumia a little better(read Clearblack and more brightness) and added a optional dual sim version and bbetter Battery, Thats all for now
9. panda123 (Posts: 27; Member since: 18 Jan 2013)
Galaxy = Android
It's as simple as that, if it runs Android, it's a Galaxy device. Much like Optimus for LG, and Xperia for Sony.
This phone retails for about $70 where I live.. off-contract, now that's a steal.