Samsung's chief product officer in the U.S. walks away
Based out of Dallas, the executive spent two years at Samsung Mobile and recently explained how Samsung wanted to be in charge of advertising its own products instead of relying on the carriers to spend money on promoting the brand. This led to a number of witty television commercials, some of which poked fun at those Apple iPhone users who wait all day on a long line to buy the phone. The carriers liked the idea of Samsung running its own spots because this way they wouldn't have to shell out as much money to promote Samsung's models.
While Packingham's decision to leave was announced today, it was known internally on Tuesday. No replacement has been named.
source: NewYorkTimes via BusinessInsider
1. JMartin22 (Posts: 709; Member since: 30 Apr 2013)
Good bye rich executive person no one cares about.
2. Slammer (Posts: 926; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)
Actually, Any Samsung fan should care. Mr. Packingham is a person that took the time to listen very closely and seriously to consumer input. This led to instant recognition to the positive aspects and high sales of Samsung's widely sought after devices. I hope Samsung's goal to continue the care and acknowledgment, will carry on. I am interested to see what or what may not have transpired leading to his choice to leave.
3. Napalm_3nema (Posts: 787; Member since: 14 Jun 2013)
Care? Manipulating benchmarks, lying about region locking, and performing corporate espionage to influence patent licensing is "care"? Your business ethics professor must have been Gordon Gekko.
4. VZWuser76 (Posts: 1174; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)
And any other executive is any different? I guarantee if we were flies on a wall at any of these mobile companies we would see far worse than what is reported. To believe otherwise is either naive or just plain ignorant.
5. Napalm_3nema (Posts: 787; Member since: 14 Jun 2013)
The difference? Most companies are at least smart enough not to air their dirty laundry in public.
However, given Samsung's track record over the last 4 years, I dare say the town of Technology Scumbags may have a few residents, but Samsung would be win mayor in a landslide.
6. Slammer (Posts: 926; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)
No company is innocent. If you believe different, then you need to be the one to talk to your professor. The crown jewel of wireless(Apple), is a company that has been around since 1976. I was 15 when it made its debut. Apple has clawed its way to the top by plenty of deception. The second iPhone with a 600 mhz processor but locking it down to 350mhz. Then slapping an S on the end of the 3 and opening up the processor. How much money do you think Apple made on that phone without spending hardly any money?
Only one example but it gets to the heart of the meat potatoes. It's a game all corporations play.
10. VZWuser76 (Posts: 1174; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)
Do you think their drty laundry was aired on purpose?
And besides, the worst companies aren't the ones who get caught, but the ones who don't.
You brought up earlier that Samsung was performing espionage to influence patent licensing. As I recall, the agreement between Apple and Nokia had to do with FRAND patents. Samsung got a look at the licensing terms, even though it wasn't supposed to.
My question is, if said patents are indeed FRAND, then why shouldn't Samsung get a look at the license? The agreement should be the same for Samsung as they would have been for Apple. MS has been going after Moto, and Apple has been going after Samsung for attempting to abuse FRAND patents, by licensing them for a higher price to them than they had to other parties. So unless Nokia was planning to do the same to Samsung, why shouldn't they be able to see the licensing terms, that would show them that they're getting the same terms as Apple did. If they are trying to license to Samsung for a higher rate than Apple, then Nokia would be abusing FRAND, and Apple an accomplice for helping to cover that up.
7. CX3NT3_713 (Posts: 1649; Member since: 18 Apr 2011)
......smh.... and i got reported for trolling? Lol
8. jove39 (Posts: 1241; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
So he didn't like sammy cheating on benchmarks?
12. newbey123 (Posts: 373; Member since: 19 Mar 2012)
Maybe he finally started feeling bad about tricking people into buying plastic crap phones.
13. Navaid (Posts: 46; Member since: 05 Sep 2013)
Like they sold plastic condom to your mother..!