Samsung Galaxy S5 vs HTC One (M8): reader's choice
Ah, it's always fun when we have the chance of putting up a comparison between rivals, and when we're looking at the wireless landscape that's been shaped in the first half of the year, there's one particular rivalry that quickly sticks out - the one between Samsung's Galaxy S5, and HTC's One (M8). Now, you may be wondering what this is all about, since we already have an in-depth comparison featuring the two super-phones. Well, here's the thing – we came up with this idea of a user comparison! In other words, you, the readers, will be the ones determining the winner.
However, this will be more than a simple, two-option poll. We'll go through all the important components of these smartphones, and you'll be given the chance to vote for whoever you think deserves to win in the given category. Needless to say, this confrontation will be way more intriguing if one doesn't just vote for their favorite in all categories, but really gives credit to the one that deserves it. For the purpose, we'll refrain from making our own comments or opinions, and will stick with more neutral, descriptive texts.
With all that said, let's proceed to our first stop, which will be the design department!
HTC and Samsung have stayed true to their signature design principles with the One (M8) and GS5. HTC's creation features an all-metal body that relies on looks to capture the hearts and minds of users. On the flip side, though, the plastic build of the Galaxy S5 is easier to grip, because it's not as slipper as metal. With its latest flagship, Samsung has also gone for a new back-side pattern, which adds a bit of charm to the otherwise generic design. In terms of size, the One (M8) is slightly taller, but also a bit narrower than its opponent. On the other hand, the Galaxy S5 is the lighter and thinner handset.
In the poll below, you can vote for whichever design you find better. That's how we'll see which is the overall more preferred handset in respect to design!
- Galaxy S5 vs One (M8): Which design is better?
418 votes (418 votes) Samsung Galaxy S5
1834 votes (1834 votes) HTC One (M8)
There are some major differences with regards to the display technologies used by the S5 and M8. The One (M8) features a 5" 1080p screen, while the GS5 has an ever so slightly bigger, 5.1" 1080p one. However, the major difference is found in the underlying tech – for the M8, that's IPS LCD, whereas for the S5, it's Super AMOLED. Needless to say, both are lookers, but the One (M8) exhibits more natural, down-to-earth colors, as opposed to the Galaxy S5's oversaturated and largely inaccurate display. However, the thing is that the S5's visuals tend to be pretty attractive to many users out there, so this is far from a one-sided battle... Check out the display benchmarks we've made with both phones and decide which one you'd enjoy more!
Display measurements and quality
|Maximum brightness (nits)Higher is better||Minimum brightness (nits)Lower is better||Contrast Higher is better||Color temperature (Kelvins)||Gamma||Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better||Delta E grayscale Lower is better|
|HTC One (M8)||490
|Samsung Galaxy S5||442
The numbers below represent the amount of deviation in the respective property, observed when a display is viewed from a 45-degree angle as opposed to direct viewing.
|Maximum brightness Lower is better||Minimum brightness Lower is better||Contrast Lower is better||Color temperature Lower is better||Gamma Lower is better||Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better||Delta E grayscale Lower is better|
|Samsung Galaxy S5||62.7%
|HTC One (M8)||79.6%
The CIE 1931 xy color gamut chart represents the set (area) of colors that a display can reproduce, with the sRGB colorspace (the highlighted triangle) serving as reference. The chart also provides a visual representation of a display's color accuracy. The small squares across the boundaries of the triangle are the reference points for the various colors, while the small dots are the actual measurements. Ideally, each dot should be positioned on top of its respective square. The 'x: CIE31' and 'y: CIE31' values in the table below the chart indicate the position of each measurement on the chart. 'Y' shows the luminance (in nits) of each measured color, while 'Target Y' is the desired luminance level for that color. Finally, 'ΔE 2000' is the Delta E value of the measured color. Delta E values of below 2 are ideal.
This measurements are made using SpectraCal's CalMAN calibration software.
The Color accuracy chart gives an idea of how close a display's measured colors are to their referential values. The first line holds the measured (actual) colors, while the second line holds the reference (target) colors. The closer the actual colors are to the target ones, the better.
This measurements are made using SpectraCal's CalMAN calibration software.
The Grayscale accuracy chart shows whether a display has a correct white balance (balance between red, green and blue) across different levels of grey (from dark to bright). The closer the Actual colors are to the Target ones, the better.
This measurements are made using SpectraCal's CalMAN calibration software.
- Galaxy S5 vs One (M8): Which display is better?
1140 votes (1140 votes) HTC One (M8)
917 votes (917 votes) Samsung Galaxy S5
Interface and functionality
Is there any doubt that these handsets are as different in terms of software as they are when it comes to hardware? Well, there shouldn't be! Samsung's champion has the latest version of TouchWiz – an incredibly feature-rich, yet somewhat cluttered user experience. Meanwhile, the One (M8) sticks with a way cleaner and leaner interface – Sense. This means that the One lacks many software features present in the S5, but then again, those are mostly things that could appeal to a limited audience.
Whether because of the extra software bulk or something else, but the Galaxy S5 tends to experience some lag issues that are rarely observed with the One (M8). Both phones are powered by almost identical hardware configurations. The processor of the S5 is clocked a tad higher, but that doesn't seem to be helping it much.
Check out the screenshots for a refresher on what these user experiences look like, and choose the one that you like more in the following poll!
Ah, isn't the camera one of the most important aspects of today's smartphones? We'd wager that it is! That's why these companies are trying so hard to come up with their own unique solutions to lure customers with. For HTC, those efforts culminate with the 4-megapixel UltraPixel camera, while Samsung's approach involves a high-resolution, 16-megapixel sensor. Meanwhile, the camera applications the handsets feature are in line with the general design principles in place with the rest of their software implementations, meaning that the Galaxy S5 sports a bunch of alternative shooting modes. Still, since those are more of the niche kind, their lack in the One (M8)'s more streamlined camera app isn't considered such a big deal.
Check out the images captured by both handsets in the following gallery, and vote for your favorite!
1. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sample video
2. HTC One (M8) Sample video
- Galaxy S5 vs One (M8): Which camera is better?
482 votes (482 votes) HTC One (M8)
1544 votes (1544 votes) Samsung Galaxy S5
What a heated face-off, eh? We've gone through all the major components of the smartphones in question, and you've had the chance to vote for the one you think should grab the win in each separate category. We can't wait to see the results, but for this, we'll have to wait for a few days. Voting will be closed on Tuesday, July 8, and we'll analyze the results on Wednesday, so stay tuned!
1. KingDingaLing (Posts: 193; Member since: 11 Oct 2013)
If only HTC made the camera a little better...could've been a lot closer.
13. The-Sailor-Man (Posts: 834; Member since: 25 Mar 2014)
The camera of M8 is not the only flop there.
22. pulkit1 (Posts: 237; Member since: 03 Jul 2014)
it is for most people . It would have been a perfect device otherwise .
31. Zack20 (Posts: 41; Member since: 10 Dec 2013)
But it is one of the main and the biggest blunder HTC made while making M8.
34. DocOc (Posts: 84; Member since: 23 Apr 2014)
Since when did the camera become such an important part of a phone? The differences are so marginal anyway...
64. Zack20 (Posts: 41; Member since: 10 Dec 2013)
For me it is. I am paying a pretty good amount of money for the phone, so I do not want just a mediocre camera, when I CAN get a much better camera in another phone in same price range.
2. xplayer57 (Posts: 25; Member since: 24 Dec 2012)
Well IMO HTC One M8 only excels in design. Some may disagree with me on interface part but i like touchwiz functionality over sense's sleek looks. Other than that S5 is winner for me
P.S. its only my opinion
7. ctn10 (Posts: 9; Member since: 23 Feb 2013)
Me too, i like touchwiz so much, it easy to use :)
21. UglyFrank (Posts: 379; Member since: 23 Jan 2014)
The fact that anyone voted for HTC for camera shows this could never be a fair test
23. pulkit1 (Posts: 237; Member since: 03 Jul 2014)
Well i voted for one in all categories except camera . indeed people voting for one camera are blind .
56. The-Sailor-Man (Posts: 834; Member since: 25 Mar 2014)
So you, voting for One display , are not blind. Right?
69. pulkit1 (Posts: 237; Member since: 03 Jul 2014)
it is my personal choice i hate cartoonish interfaces that too when they run on extremely vibrant displays. I like S-lcd more .
26. Zack20 (Posts: 41; Member since: 10 Dec 2013)
I was thinking the same thing.
If HTC would have been leading for camera, then there would have been no reason at all to believe any poll result on this article.
44. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8240; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Having owned both phones, S5 is a better choice. Camera, call quality, battery life (especially), features, faster charging times, phone not getting hot and waterproof/dustproof is what ranks the S5 supreme over the M8.
M8 has great sound, build quality, faster/smoother, and better FFC.
I'm switching back to the S5 in three weeks.
45. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8240; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Oh, and you can't forget display. Bar none best one I've ever used.
60. Lboogey6 (Posts: 266; Member since: 31 Jan 2012)
I'm with you here the s5 when put side by side with the htc has much more to offer but if you put an iphone and a htc one is like bland on both end so if you don't want anything with the phone i recommend that. but the functionality compared to what it offers blows it out of the water ...water resistances also
3. AfterShock (Posts: 2799; Member since: 02 Nov 2012)
I would take the HTC myself if these were my only choices.
Smoothness is a +10 to me.
Even with that gimped camera, no offense to owners but you what I mean.
14. The-Sailor-Man (Posts: 834; Member since: 25 Mar 2014)
"reader's choice" LOL
We know that commenters on the tech sites are mostly iboys pretending to be Android users that are "disappointed of Samsung", "love aluminium" and "hate TW". To fight Samsung.
You say "I would take the HTC myself " but you are rocking iPhone. Right?
38. AfterShock (Posts: 2799; Member since: 02 Nov 2012)
Wtf, are you new here?
If you're not and don't know better, carry on.
61. Arte-8800 (limited) (Posts: 4281; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)
Buy know you should know who is what and likes what, since you've been here for 4months.
We all know who the iBoys are
Finalflash likes Android
4. ArtSim98 (limited) (Posts: 2738; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)
lol At the guys who voted for M8 camera!
33. karkavelas (Posts: 58; Member since: 25 Oct 2013)
I have the m8 and I have to say I am satisfied with the camera and especially with the video.
I wouldn't say no for more details and megapixel but I am happy with the results.
About the video I am really happy because the sound that this phone can capture its amazing.
If I was a person who like to take amazing photos I would buy a Dslr camera instead because they have optical zoom and they are created for that.
42. chebner (Posts: 140; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
I have to agree. The camera in the M8 is perfectly acceptable as a smartphone camera and not near as bad as everyone says. And the video on the M8 is very good.
Overall the S5 camera is better so I did vote for it. But the camera on the M8 isn't so bad that people should just dismiss it outright like so many do on PA. For what most people use a camera phone for the M8 is perfectly acceptable. If you're really that concerned about picture quality then get a real camera (dslr).
5. farhad_per (banned) (Posts: 128; Member since: 26 Mar 2014)
Display mate : samsung galaxy S5 has the best display ever....the most accurate colors...!
15. Genza (Posts: 156; Member since: 12 Mar 2014)
DisplayMate Numbers vs Anandtech, PA real life proof and software measurements.
The only way i can accept and believe DisplayMate numbers is if they can show me some real life proof and i also i want them prove it that they method and software is better and more accurate than the other method and software that most profesionals use when they doing display calibration and measurements.
24. pulkit1 (Posts: 237; Member since: 03 Jul 2014)
come on man discrediting a man who has knowledge and resources 1000 times more than you is just stupid!
20. josephnero (Posts: 305; Member since: 16 Nov 2011)
I trust Anandtech 10000times more than any other
25. The-Sailor-Man (Posts: 834; Member since: 25 Mar 2014)
Let me guess then, what is phone. LOL
47. farhad_per (banned) (Posts: 128; Member since: 26 Mar 2014)
Hey noob kid do you know displaymate..?do you know How many site and magazine trust displaymate results such as pcmagazine and very else... go to site and see and wtf about that crap anantech or sorry ianandtech..! Diplaymate and Gsmarena are very very trusted and reliable than any other site...!
39. ArtSim98 (limited) (Posts: 2738; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)
And Supercurio also said the opposite of displaymate. He has some amazing software to measure displays.
16. The-Sailor-Man (Posts: 834; Member since: 25 Mar 2014)
The tech media , don't give a S about display mate , when they must fight Samsung.
43. Genza (Posts: 156; Member since: 12 Mar 2014)
No its because most profesionals is not using DisplayMate method or software when it comes display calibration and measurements.
And if what DisplayMate said is true that S5 has the most accurate colors, the tiger, sand and the color charts would not look like this.
46. farhad_per (banned) (Posts: 128; Member since: 26 Mar 2014)
If you dont have S5 please don't comment..! I have S5 and I get that tiger photo and it was 100 opposite of PA tiger photo of S5..PA is a lier site .. in my S5 that tiger was pure white more than 5S photo..!
51. Genza (Posts: 156; Member since: 12 Mar 2014)
I don't surprised if you deny all the real proof that i have show you.
You and DisplayMate can only talk about BS, numbers and theories.
without being able to show us real life proof like Anandtech and PA.
If what PA show is a lie why Anandtech and a some other sites say the same thing???
And if DisplayMate methods and software was so good why most professionals not using the same method and software from DisplayMate???
52. farhad_per (banned) (Posts: 128; Member since: 26 Mar 2014)
Are you drunk..? My proof is front of my eyes now and I guarantee that those blueish photos are 100% fake...! And every ones knows that this site is bias anti.samsung and apple's die heart fan..! Go to display mate site and read about us section..! U can't even compare this fan websites like PA and one hater guy like anand.. with display mate..hope you understand and judge when you work with S5 in real life like me then comment..
53. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8240; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Samsung simply produced the best display thus far in the smartphone market. Waiting for the Note 4 in October. :)
8. james.blunt.1973 (Posts: 32; Member since: 15 Dec 2013)
Why you people mix up design with build material?
Samsung DESIGN is awesome. slim bezels, ergonomic, light and compact, but its build materials is cheap plastic.
to me, design is more important...
18. The-Sailor-Man (Posts: 834; Member since: 25 Mar 2014)
"but its build materials is cheap plastic."
It's not "cheap plastic" . Not cheaper than the aluminium tin can.
27. pulkit1 (Posts: 237; Member since: 03 Jul 2014)
enough with your tin can ... looks like everyone except you thinks plastic is cheap ( not literally ). The problem with samsung phones is all samsung phones from ace to s5 look the same.
32. Zack20 (Posts: 41; Member since: 10 Dec 2013)
They could have used different material for flagship phones atleast.
Something different in looks for the entire S series and the Note series.
But they didn't :-(
57. The-Sailor-Man (Posts: 834; Member since: 25 Mar 2014)
"looks like everyone except you thinks plastic is cheap"
Looks like you don't know how many millions don't care about the cheap aluminium tin can , and buy Galaxy?
Looks like you don't know who are 90% of the commenters on the tech sites(and tech sites staff)? That buy only aluminium iphones but pretend to be HTC users.
67. pulkit1 (Posts: 237; Member since: 03 Jul 2014)
how about if a call s5 plastic dustbin .. and i have had HTC phones in the past . i am not hating on samsung phones but i really had to comment when i saw your hate towards HTC.
28. Zack20 (Posts: 41; Member since: 10 Dec 2013)
I agree with James. The DESIGN is perfect, but only if they could use better materials.
But anyway, I would buy S5 over M8 anytime!
54. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4000; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)
There are different grades of materials. Samsung's plastic is typically very cheap, but the plastic on Nokia devices is typically very good. Just like how the aluminum on phones like the iPhone and HTC One is higher quality than that of the aluminum cans are made of.
Also, there's no such thing as an aluminum tin can. Tin and aluminum are different elements, and as far as I know they don't use both in cans. There are tin cans, and there are aluminum cans, but not aluminum tin cans.
58. The-Sailor-Man (Posts: 834; Member since: 25 Mar 2014)
" Samsung's plastic is typically very cheap"
Who told you that?
Or you are "unibody" lover?
Well , millions of ppl are NOT.
59. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4000; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)
I told myself that when I used their products. The Galaxy S2 was alright, but the Galaxy S3 and on have been pretty cheap.
9. RandomUsername (Posts: 454; Member since: 29 Oct 2013)
GSMArena already does this... But anyway, let the fanboy wars begin!
10. HTCOE (Posts: 468; Member since: 20 Nov 2011)
everything but the camera in my opinion...if it would've had at least an 8mp camera with enhanced technology built in i may have said otherwise but s5 failed in the other departments
11. taz89 (Posts: 2014; Member since: 03 May 2011)
Smaller bezels and a 8mp camera like the 5s would have made the HTC one m8 a great phone.
12. gynorm (Posts: 5; Member since: 31 Jul 2013)
I am really annoyed with Ray S. at Phoneareana, the display on the GS5 is really nice. you can even change the type of dipslay, use Cinema mode and colors are most accurate, also Displaymate.com's review of the GS5's display is more accurate and in depth. Ray.... why the hate on the GS5 these past few days?
17. Slammer (Posts: 1003; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)
When it came to design, I suspected that HTC would win this category. However, I voted for Samsung due to accessibility to battery and SDcard. It is one of the main reasons I left HTC after 7 years. Too many issues with batteries and the lack of technological advancements with these batteries, forced me to view accessibility as a necessity; not an option. This ultimately positions my opinion as Samsung having the better design for consumer control in easy repairs.
29. jellmoo (Posts: 665; Member since: 31 Oct 2011)
I remain perplexed by those that like the design of the M8. All that wasted space in the black bar at the bottom is utterly terrible. Look how high up the on screen buttons are on the device. It's almost ridiculous.
36. DocOc (Posts: 84; Member since: 23 Apr 2014)
Apparently not everyone agrees with your conclusion of how space should be used nor do they care if every square centimeter is used as screen space.
49. jellmoo (Posts: 665; Member since: 31 Oct 2011)
Well yes, this would be my opinion. I find it a terrible design choice. Others disagree. I still maintain that it is a definite step backwards from what was present on the M7.
41. chebner (Posts: 140; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
If you're just looking at the phone I agree with you, it looks like a bunch of wasted space. But when you hold it in your hand and just use it, the spacing feels right. With such a tall device one handed use would be more difficult if the buttons were closer to the bottom. Both devices are too big to be called one handed phones, but with the buttons spaced higher it's easier to hold and operate with one hand. The balance in your hand just isn't right when you have to reach all the way to the bottom of the phone.
Just speaking from my own experience. I own an M8 but know people with the S5. The S5 feels more clumsy in one hand.
30. Zack20 (Posts: 41; Member since: 10 Dec 2013)
I have had an "all-metal" phone before, and let me tell you, it SLIPS a LOT.
I had to get a cover for my phone to prevent it from slipping, but that cover added a lot of volume to my phone (not many covers available for it)
Nothing personal against HTC, but my opinion would be a strict NO to an all-metal phone.
35. DocOc (Posts: 84; Member since: 23 Apr 2014)
In a blind test, I bet most people would not be able to tell much of a difference in the photos between the two phones.