x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • New math: Apple spends $23 more than Amazon to build its "mini" tablet, but charges $130 more

New math: Apple spends $23 more than Amazon to build its "mini" tablet, but charges $130 more

Posted: , by Alan F.

Tags :

New math: Apple spends $23 more than Amazon to build its
Many casual gadget fans might wonder what the point is of those tear-downs. But not only are they interesting for the advanced Geek to see what is inside the device he is using, it also gives us a look at the different business practices of the manufacturers. Let's take a look at Microsoft. As we already told you, the Redmond based company spends $271 for components to build the Microsoft Surface RT. The tablet is priced at $499 and up. The Touch Cover brings in another $100 of pure profit to the bottom line.

You really can't compare the Microsoft Surface with its larger screen to the Amazon Kindle Fire HD. But we can compare the return on the investment in parts and the $165 that it takes to build the Android powered tablet provides very little return if any for the online retailer, who sells them for $199. After computing research and marketing costs, you have to figure that Amazon continues to lose on each unit sold. But here is the difference. As we pointed out more than a year ago, Amazon makes its money by selling Kindle Fire users content, apps and storage. Microsoft wants to make its money on the tablet since it doesn't have the content to sell like Amazon does. After selling content, apps and storage to Amazon Kindle Fire HD users, it is estimated that Amazon makes a $100 profit on each tablet sold which is a pretty decent return on a $199.99 device, although not as high as Microsoft's margin.

Amazon makes money on sales of content, apps and storage to Amazon Kindle Fire HD users

Amazon makes money on sales of content, apps and storage to Amazon Kindle Fire HD users

What about Apple? The previous tear-down revealed that Apple spends $188 to build the Apple iPad mini. One way to look at this is that Apple spends $23 more to build the iPad mini than Amazon does to build the Kindle Fire HD, but sells its tablet for $130  more. But that only serves to highlight the difference in the approach taken by the two companies. Amazon wants to get as many tablets into customers hands as possible so it can sell them all of the extras that it profits from selling. Apple, like Microsoft, wants to profit from the actual sale of the device.

Without knowing research and marketing costs or tax rates, we can't compute net profit margins, but based on the tear-down costs and retail pricing, Microsoft's return on its investment to produce its tablet starts at 84%. If Amazon does make $100 selling content, apps and storage, its return is 67% while Apple's figure is 75%. As juicy as it sounds, Apple has already said that the profit margin for the Apple iPad mini is less than the company receives for its other products.

None of the three manufacturers is actually giving away something for nothing. Amazon isn't in business to lose money, so you know that their business plan must be working for them. Microsoft and Apple are more traditional in their approach, which is to sell their tablets as high as possible and profit from the difference it costs the firms to produce them.

source: Gizmodo

55 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 05 Nov 2012, 11:49 3

1. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 14193; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


It's better to pay more for higher quality

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 11:51 41

2. ajac09 (Posts: 1481; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)


paying more doesnt mean you get better quality. It just means apple is making more money

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 12:38 3

13. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 14193; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


If Apple continues to make good products then there's no problem for people paying good money to use them.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 12:52 25

15. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


What good products?

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 13:53 1

25. therealestmc (Posts: 353; Member since: 23 Jul 2012)


A product that the user is satisfied, not just thrown in some corners after a month of use. A product that has an unmatched ecosystem and built with premium materials, not cheap plastic.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 14:06

29. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 14193; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


The truth has been commented.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 15:03 11

34. AnTuTu (Posts: 1580; Member since: 14 Oct 2012)


Get a life Mxyptlk

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 17:27

43. darkkjedii (Posts: 22059; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


I notice anyone who likes apple, or doesn't agree with u, u tell to get a life. U sound like a big baby that takes his ball and leaves the court, cuz he can't get his way.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 15:01 10

33. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Why wouldnt they be satisfied with there Half-Baked
Restrictead OS, along with a Apple logo stampet on a cheap shatering glass and everyone posing with there iPhone, not caring or botherd what good for nothing useless midrange product.

Yea no wonder theres a product once a year, try buying a new phone every 6 months if your that well of. My foot same booring app launcher for 5 years with no evolution, still following Linux footsteps.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 16:44 5

40. p0rkguy (Posts: 685; Member since: 23 Nov 2010)


Bad. If people were satisfied, they wouldn't "need" the next one.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 22:26 1

52. Darkerm (Posts: 308; Member since: 31 Jan 2012)


Well Said Bro :D

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 21:39

49. firelightx (Posts: 71; Member since: 13 Oct 2011)


If you had stopped with the first sentence, you would have been just fine. At the end of the day, a product that the user purchasing is satisfied with is a legitimately good product. Period the end.

It's when you start getting into "unmatched ecosystem" and "premium materials" that you get so downranked.

You really shouldn't have written those two lines. Particularly when there ARE ecosystems out there that match iOS. Especially when you don't understand the difference between cheap plastic (what that case around your iPhone is made out of) and high grade polycarbonate material (what the battery backing for the GS3 is made from).

Case in point - when I drop my Galaxy on the ground, it doesn't have PAINT chipping away from it's back over my mistake.

posted on 06 Nov 2012, 04:22

55. someones4 (Posts: 625; Member since: 16 Sep 2012)


Coca cola cans are made of premium materials (aluminium ) as well....

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 17:28

44. darkkjedii (Posts: 22059; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


What bad products do they make?

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 13:51 6

22. tedkord (Posts: 12245; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


That would be true if they made better products than competitors. Sadly, they do not.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 14:07

30. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 14193; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


So why do competitors like to copy Apple then? If their products weren't better then there wouldn't be anyone copying them.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 15:06 9

35. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


More like your Apple copied Sony and LG. Stop posting negative and causing flame wars.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 16:56 4

41. p0rkguy (Posts: 685; Member since: 23 Nov 2010)


Copy is such a hypocritical word to defend Apple.

That's like saying you, Mxyzptlk, telling me, p0rkguy, to go suck a d*ck when you already have one in your mouth. I mean how do you even say that? Does that even make sense to you?

Also, neutral words would be to combining for the better, not stealing. Let's say Apple combined things and made better, why can't other companies do it now?
Do you not want better? I mean sure back in the days Power Rangers was awesome, but now there's better. Are you going to disagree with that?

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 17:24 3

42. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


No matter what, they will disagree.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 22:25 1

51. Nadr1212 (Posts: 741; Member since: 22 Sep 2012)


Are any of us surprised ? It's Apple we're talking about, they just want to make money!!!

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 11:54 16

5. timtimity (Posts: 196; Member since: 13 Aug 2012)


I'm happy to pay more for better quality - when the product costs more to make because of it. I'm not happy at paying a lot more than it costs to make just to line a company's pocket.

In this instance quality doesn't come into it. This article is not about quality. It's about price difference between the cost to make and selling cost.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 12:13 12

6. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


More like for logo and false hype.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 12:25 11

9. JonBjSig (Posts: 176; Member since: 17 Nov 2011)


They're spending $23 more than Amazon to build the tablet but selling it for $130 more, the extra money goes directly into Apple's pocket and has nothing to do with quality.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 12:33 7

11. PhenomFaz (Posts: 1236; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


and what about the less fortunate?
are you saying people who cant pay premium price dont deserve to use a common feature like online services? Premium price is good for premium features...in today's day and age neither a tablet nor do basic online services qualify as premium buddy!

And what about socio-economic responsibilities of a tech giant like Apple?
on one side it says it is launching an education focussed product llike ipad mini yet is charging students a helluva lot more than what they pay for kindle, nook or nexus 7!
Pure capitalistic bureaucracy!

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 13:56 1

27. therealestmc (Posts: 353; Member since: 23 Jul 2012)


Welcome to earth!

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 14:29 2

31. PhenomFaz (Posts: 1236; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


dont really need a welcome...i am quite familiar with the place :)
I am not asking for anyone to become Mother Teresa but all I am saying is people shouldnt just snuggle up in their own comfy bubble and forget about others.
The truth of the matter is If you're naked then you should cover yourself, not close your eyes and pretend you're not naked because you cant see yourself naked! If you do that then only you're the fool and everyone else is already seeing you naked!

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 17:31 1

45. darkkjedii (Posts: 22059; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


Capitalistic bureaucracy? Phenom I'm starting to think u may b a starwars fan like me. Those where the emperors words too

posted on 06 Nov 2012, 03:12

54. PhenomFaz (Posts: 1236; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


Dude Star Wars is and will forever be THE FORCE to reckon with in Hollywood...its just awesome!

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 18:34

47. rusticguy (Posts: 2828; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)


It's better to save money than to pay up for a overhyped crap.

posted on 05 Nov 2012, 11:51 13

3. Savage (unregistered)


Is that really a surprise?

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories