x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Leaked LG L35 apparently aimed at the price-conscious crowd with entry-level specs

Leaked LG L35 apparently aimed at the price-conscious crowd with entry-level specs

Posted: , by Chris P.

Leaked LG L35 apparently aimed at the price-conscious crowd with entry-level specs
LG appears to be prepping a new low-cost, entry-level device, dubbed L35 (D150), according to an UA profile unearthed from LG's very own site. The device in question is nearly identical to what Sony has in store for the price-conscious niche with its still fresh Xperia E1. According to MyLGPhones, the L35 will be released in European countries including Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal, and Hungary.

So far, we have quite some information regarding the specs of LG's upcoming low-end. It's got a 3.2-inch, 320x480 (HVGA) pixel resolution screen, and runs on the latest build of Android Kitkat -- 4.4.2. The L35 is apparently powered by a 1.2GHz, dual-core Snapdragon 200 (MSM8210) chip by Qualcomm, with ARM's Cortex-A7 CPU and Adreno 302 graphics (the same chip running the new Moto E), and 512MB of RAM. The imaging department will make do with a 3-megapixel rear-facing shooter, and there's a 1540 mAh juicer keeping the lights on. The amount of on-board storage, unsurprisingly for this class, sits at just 4GB, though there is a slot for a microSD card (up to 32GB more).

The LG L35 measures in at 109.4 x 59 x 11.9 mm, and weighs 108.4 grams, and we're told to expect to see its body come in both a black and whtie version. It's currently unknown how LG will approach pricing with this very basic device, nor are we aware of the company's plans as far as an official release window is concerned.

source: MyLGPhones [1], [2] via LGMobileIndia 

15 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 19 May 2014, 03:22 5

1. Planterz (Posts: 2079; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


Sounds craptacular.

posted on 19 May 2014, 03:44

4. pokharkarsaga (Posts: 384; Member since: 23 Feb 2012)


They are trying to compete with moto e but failed.Moto is the new nokia for android.hope lenovo doesn't spoil the taste.

posted on 19 May 2014, 04:49

6. Felix_Gatto (Posts: 903; Member since: 03 Jul 2013)


Samsung's low-end Galaxies are more crapstacular than this.

posted on 19 May 2014, 16:40

15. sgodsell (Posts: 3643; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)


No, the Nokia X takes all the awards for being the worst Android device, ever.

posted on 19 May 2014, 03:30

2. boosook (Posts: 1437; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)


I thougth something more entry level than the L40 could not exist... (and, btw, after the Moto E disclosure, everything that was "entry level" has suddendly become "crap")

posted on 19 May 2014, 03:43

3. peace247 (Posts: 206; Member since: 26 Apr 2014)


really 3.2-inch, 320x480 screen android 2014!!!
i don't believe these companies.....

posted on 19 May 2014, 04:41 4

5. Jishnusur (Posts: 74; Member since: 07 Oct 2013)


These phones are not for you mate. There are countries in which people earn less than USD 100 per month. If they want a phone, they don't see the specs like we do. Frankly, they don't even know what screen resolution is. Hope you get it. I just answered the "Why" hehe..

Cheers

posted on 19 May 2014, 07:33

12. fireblade (Posts: 716; Member since: 27 Dec 2013)


Too bad the cheapest android phone from LG is more than $100. With the same money, we can get more powerful phones like xiaomi, moto E, lenovo...
Don't buy low end phones from famous brand. They all sucks

posted on 19 May 2014, 06:07

7. h27_Venom (Posts: 76; Member since: 16 May 2014)


Still no way near moto e..

it has better screen in terms of size,screen resolution and pixel density
scratch and water resistant ..
has 1 gb ram
has near stock android experience which means less bloatware...

posted on 19 May 2014, 06:12 3

8. Anshulonweb (Posts: 430; Member since: 07 Feb 2014)


512mb ram should be illegal in 2014

posted on 19 May 2014, 06:50

9. Edward_bly (Posts: 278; Member since: 11 Dec 2013)


Well the specs come close to the first htc evo, which was a great phone for its time. I don't see why those who make very little, would be disappointed. The only way I see it competeing against motorola is if this phone cost $30-60.

posted on 19 May 2014, 06:55

10. antonioli (Posts: 200; Member since: 08 Sep 2013)


I will kick who buy this crap instead of Moto E.

posted on 19 May 2014, 07:19

11. Edward_bly (Posts: 278; Member since: 11 Dec 2013)


What if it's cheaper than moto e?

posted on 19 May 2014, 08:53

14. h27_Venom (Posts: 76; Member since: 16 May 2014)


If they are targeting this phone for asian countries like India.Then there are already other local alternative like lava,karboon,micromax that offers better phones for less than $100..so even if it is cheaper than moto e that’s not going to make much of difference.

posted on 19 May 2014, 07:39

13. NokiaFTW (Posts: 2071; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)


The Moto G is a fantastic smartphone for its price, but not the Moto E. Its competing with the Lumia 525 in its segment, which offers better performance, software support and removable battery, all at a similar price point.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories