Google/Apple teamup succeeds in purchasing Kodak patents for $525M
Consortium organized by Intellectual Ventures and RPX Corporation to pay approximately $525 million for purchase and licenses of patents
ROCHESTER, N.Y., Dec 19, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) — –Builds on Kodak’s momentum toward a successful emergence in the first half of 2013
Eastman Kodak Company has completed a series of agreements that successfully monetizes its digital imaging patents.
The proposed transaction, which achieves one of Kodak’s key restructuring objectives, follows other recent major accomplishments that include an agreement for interim and exit financing for the company’s emergence from its Chapter 11 restructuring, and resolution of U.S. retiree non-pension benefits liabilities. Kodak’s monetization of IP assets further builds on its momentum toward a successful emergence in the first half of 2013.
Under the agreements, Kodak will receive approximately $525 million, a portion of which will be paid by 12 intellectual property licensees organized by Intellectual Ventures and RPX Corporation, with each licensee receiving rights with respect to the digital imaging patent portfolio and certain other Kodak patents. Another portion will be paid by Intellectual Ventures, which is acquiring the digital imaging patent portfolio subject to these new licenses, as well as previously existing licenses.
“This monetization of patents is another major milestone toward successful emergence,” Antonio M. Perez, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, said. “Our progress has accelerated over the past several weeks as we prepare to emerge as a strong, sustainable company. This proposed transaction enables Kodak to repay a substantial amount of our initial DIP loan, satisfy a key condition for our new financing facility, and position our Commercial Imaging business for further growth and success.”
The transaction enables the company to continue innovating in its core Commercial Imaging technologies that are fundamental to its future. Commercial Imaging is a business in which Kodak has significant competitive advantages and strong growth prospects.
“Kodak remains a major center of invention and innovation,” Perez said.
The transaction also includes an agreement to settle current patent-related litigation between the participants and Kodak, which avoids additional litigation costs and helps to ensure that management and the company’s resources focus on enhancing the operations of its core future businesses.
The proposed transaction is subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and the satisfaction of certain customary conditions.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This document includes “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning the Company’s plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenue or performance, capital expenditures, liquidity, financing needs, business trends, and other information that is not historical information. When used in this document, the words “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “plans,” “intends,” “believes,” “predicts,” “forecasts,” or future or conditional verbs, such as “will,” “should,” “could,” or “may,” and variations of such words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends and data are based upon the Company’s expectations and various assumptions. Future events or results may differ from those anticipated or expressed in these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements include, among others, the risks and uncertainties described in more detail in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2012, June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012, under the headings “Business,” “Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources,” and those described in filings made by the Company with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and in other filings the Company makes with the SEC from time to time, as well as the following: the Company’s ability to successfully emerge from Chapter 11 as a profitable sustainable company; the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to develop, secure approval of and consummate one or more plans of reorganization with respect to the Chapter 11 cases; the Company’s ability to improve its operating structure, financial results and profitability; the ability of the Company to achieve cash forecasts, financial projections, and projected growth; our ability to raise sufficient proceeds from the sale of businesses and non-core assets; the businesses the Company expects to emerge from Chapter 11; the ability of the company to discontinue certain businesses or operations; the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern; the Company’s ability to comply with the Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) covenants in its Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement; our ability to obtain additional financing; the potential adverse effects of the Chapter 11 proceedings on the Company’s liquidity, results of operations, brand or business prospects; the monetization of our digital imaging patent portfolio; the outcome of our intellectual property patent litigation matters; the Company’s ability to generate or raise cash and maintain a cash balance sufficient to comply with the minimum liquidity covenants in its Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement and to fund continued investments, capital needs, restructuring payments and service its debt; our ability to fairly resolve legacy liabilities; the resolution of claims against the company; our ability to retain key executives, managers and employees; our ability to maintain product reliability, innovation and quality, and growth in relevant markets; our ability to effectively anticipate technology trends and develop and market new products, solutions and technologies; and the impact of the global economic environment on the Company. There may be other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf apply only as of the date of this document and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this document. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
2. lukasound posted on 19 Dec 2012, 15:45 6
It's all about the money, it's all about the dum dum duh dee dum dum...
6. Nathan_ingx posted on 19 Dec 2012, 16:59 5
Keep your friends close but your enemies closer.
In this case, i don't know which one's the enemy. ;)
3. jroc74 posted on 19 Dec 2012, 16:17 8
Nice. Hopefully this means less lawsuits, more working together.
4. wendygarett posted on 19 Dec 2012, 16:35 1
I love to see Google makes friends with so called "devil" hehehe :p
5. wendygarett posted on 19 Dec 2012, 16:50 2
Oh wait, Google's best friend IS Apple... Google also provide YouTube, voice search, and now Google maps, thank you Google for sharing experience to ios :)
24. htc_prep posted on 20 Dec 2012, 01:13 2
Wendy Google provides services which they collect money off of and apple collects money off the hardware and blindfolds they sell so they both win.
With all the stories I see you commenting on wouldn't you read the articles?
God works with the devil in order to teach humans lessons. Ever hear the story of lot?
7. JGuinan007 posted on 19 Dec 2012, 17:04 3
So does this mean all Kodak patents can be used by Apple and Google and they will sue Microsoft or Nokia if they are found using one?
9. MC1123 posted on 19 Dec 2012, 18:33 2
oh my gosh... yeah maybe... and maybe they wil go after cannor as well...
thats why i think this is a bad idea!
16. jed27 posted on 19 Dec 2012, 21:42 3
Your autocorrect is based on your texting history. Don't blame it.
20. OSFantasma posted on 19 Dec 2012, 23:34 0
23. Johnnokia posted on 20 Dec 2012, 01:12 1
No one could sue Nokia.... it is patents' motherland
8. joey_sfb posted on 19 Dec 2012, 17:41 2
Apple want to teach M$ a lesson for daring to refuse the 30% cut on their iOS platform for M$ Office 365 license.
Apple; "Its not about the money but the principle that its my god damn rights to make all those money!!"
10. MC1123 posted on 19 Dec 2012, 19:14 0
really hate why PA just post apple and google only where there's actually RIM and facebook on it!
they are 10!! and please name the others!
12. WinC76 posted on 19 Dec 2012, 19:43 3
Here are most of the companies:
17. MC1123 posted on 19 Dec 2012, 21:54 1
yeah... but i think nokia has enough camera patents..but still they need to be there!!
what the heck is huawei doing there!
and what is shutterfly?
19. WinC76 posted on 19 Dec 2012, 22:19 0
Not only that, since Microsoft is there, they don't really need them camera patents.
Huawei's there for the same reason as everyone else.
Shutterfly is some online photo service.
18. MC1123 posted on 19 Dec 2012, 21:58 1
together we climb to the top of the world
We can be what we what for the world to see
We are the children of yesterday's dream...
but its not just apple and google...
PA just want to make some drama!
22. jroc74 posted on 20 Dec 2012, 00:22 0
You have to admit this is good drama tho...lol. Those 2 seen as working together? Thats a good thing to me.
21. pankajgupta posted on 20 Dec 2012, 00:01 3
Here is the list of all the companies:
Fujifilm Holdings Corp.,
HTC Corp. and
All major mobile players except Sony and Nokia.
Nokia i believe will be saved by its liason with MS.
26. darac posted on 20 Dec 2012, 03:39 0
So, one has ~ 45 billion cash pile while other has 110 billion, and they team up to buy 500 million worth of patents.
Makes sense not