x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Nokia Lumia 1520 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3

Go to page
Nokia Lumia 1520 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3

Nokia Lumia 1520 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Nokia Lumia 1520 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Nokia Lumia 1520 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Nokia Lumia 1520 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Nokia Lumia 1520 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Nokia Lumia 1520 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Introduction


More than ever before, this year we saw an unprecedented amount of larger than life smartphones entering the space – commonly known to many of us as “phablets.” They’re gargantuan devices that might overpower those with small appetites, but they serve their purpose in their own sort of unique way. Even with all of the hoopla surrounding “flagship” smartphones, these phablets of sorts have become an indelible part of the industry, as they really do super-size things.

For Android, there’s no arguing that the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has been the most prized device, not only because it’s armed with today’s most cutting-edge hardware, but because Sammy is able to refine the experience by throwing in several useful features that increase its functionality. Meanwhile, Windows Phone is now finally in the mix, thanks to the recent introduction of the mighty Nokia Lumia 1520. Obviously, these two aren’t afraid to expose their sizes, but it’s a battle between the best from each respective platforms – so let’s see who can come out on top!

Design


When it comes down to beauty, we really have to go with the Lumia 1520 on this one, mainly because of its stylish attitude. Throw in its tapered design and the fact that it’s available in various color options, it undoubtedly all helps to catch our attention from a first glance. Although it’s not as stylish, the Note 3 has more of a sophisticated appearance thanks to its faux-pas leather casing that’s further accented by the stitching around its rear. For all of its worth, it just can’t quite match the attractive star power of the Lumia 1520.

It might be beaten in the looks department, but the Note 3 is more comfortable to hold in the hand – a lot easier too because it’s not as wide as its rival. Indeed, it’s still a beefy sized thing, but it’s much more forgiving when we factor in the heavier weight and pointed corners of the Lumia 1520. On the surface, they’re both constructed out of plastic, but the unibody construction of the Lumia 1520 tends to feel a bit sturdier – with less creaking around the edges too.

Looking around the edges of both devices, they have several things in common – like their power buttons, volume controls, 3.5mm headset jacks, and various microphones. However, the Note 3 dishes up a few extra goodies with its package. Specifically, they include a faster microUSB 3.0 port, S-Pen, and an IR blaster that turns the phone into a universal remote. Yes, we appreciate that they both have microSD slots, but it’s easier to access with the Note 3, since it’s right there when we remove its rear casing – whereas with the Lumia 1520, we have to use a SIM removal tool to access it.

Grandeur is something that they prize highly, so it doesn’t surprise us that it extends into their cameras as well. Much like Nokia’s other recent offering, the Lumia 1520 is able to raise a few eyebrows due to its number crunching 20-megapixel PureView cameraThe Note 3’s 13-megapixel auto-focus camera is still a head turner on its own.


Display


Massive is one of the many words that can best describe their displays, but we can also say that they’re simply marvelous as well. Honestly, we like the two displays equally, as they have their own unique assets that make them so darn lovable. For the Lumia 1520 and its larger 6-inch 1080p IPS LCD display, we’re wowed by its immense size no doubt, but it dishes up the stronger brightness output and superior outdoor visibility. On paper, its 368 ppi pixel density count might be lower than the Note 3’s tally of 386 ppi, but seriously folks, it’s really hard to distinguish who really has the upper hand – even with a close inspection with our eyes.

On the other hand, the Note 3’s 5.7-inch 1080p Super AMOLED screen comes to life thanks in part to the overly saturated colors it produces – giving it that subtle glow to reel us in from afar. Viewing angles are actually better with it, since it maintains its clarity at all angles better than the Lumia 1520, but it tends to wash out under outdoor settings. However, there’s a bit more geek tech involved with it, seeing that the screen itself is able to track either our finger, or the S-Pen stylus, as we hover them over the display.

Nokia Lumia 1520 360-Degrees View


Samsung Galaxy Note 3 360-Degrees View



92 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 28 Nov 2013, 08:09 4

1. chunk1x (Posts: 248; Member since: 25 Jun 2011)


This review is all about the Gods that rule their platforms. Really hard for me to choose which one wins.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 08:25 10

8. alterecho (Posts: 1072; Member since: 23 Feb 2012)


Thats easy.
For the hardware (build, etc) - Nokia 1520.
For OS - Note 3.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 08:34 16

14. JakeLee (limited) (Posts: 892; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


OS? Note3?????

You must be kidding.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 09:47 19

28. PapaSmurf (Posts: 7714; Member since: 14 May 2012)


Clearly you've never used a Note 3 before and just a blind hater.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 10:41 5

36. papss (unregistered)


Oh not true smurf... I've used and still use both platforms (1020 and note 3) and I STILL prefer wp8. What that says is that OS preference isn't fact.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 10:56 8

40. SleepingOz (unregistered)


I doubt that since you've always been a nokia fanboy.
Android just offer so much more than WP.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 12:03 7

52. papss (unregistered)


That doesn't mean that everyone cares about those features though.. you android fanboys tout choice and my choice is wp8

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 13:49 5

63. Dastrix (Posts: 577; Member since: 23 Nov 2012)


My thoughts exactly papss! I choose WP8 as well, as do a lot of people. There's an obvious reason *that Lagdroid fanboys won't ever acknowledge* why people are switching...

posted on 29 Nov 2013, 00:00 1

78. SleepingOz (unregistered)


Yeah but this is clearly fanboyism.
'Cause the Note 3 can actually do everything the 1520 can, but better(except may be taking low light pictures) and much much more! And don't come with the build argument, there's a lot of drop tests on youtube that prove that the Note 3 is hell solid.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 15:40 5

68. Omar-BHR95 (Posts: 184; Member since: 23 Dec 2012)


but WP doesn't offer malwares and lag after you fill up your memory or multitask

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 20:27 2

76. alterecho (Posts: 1072; Member since: 23 Feb 2012)


WP8 has other problems. WP8 fills up memory on its own, for reasons unknown. My 'other' storage shows 2.45 GB used and system 1.93 GB used. So out of 8 GB, its gobbled up 4.38 GB, on its own.
I can't install apps anymore.
Its a problem with WP8 and exists widely.
Just search 'WP8 other storage problem'

posted on 29 Nov 2013, 10:44 1

85. Bilpocalypse (Posts: 301; Member since: 13 Oct 2012)


With the 1520, there is no "other" storage, just temporary files. The temporary files can be deleted right in the settings. If you want to compare storage wasted, tell me why WP8 only takes up 2.6GB of storage while Android with TouchWiz takes up nearly 7GB.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 09:21

23. zuckerboy (Posts: 898; Member since: 22 Dec 2011)


Thats what Im thinking

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 10:55 7

39. Long1 (banned) (Posts: 399; Member since: 18 May 2013)


The Black Note 3 is more beautiful and classy than this Nokia brick.
Check it out.
They on purpose choose always the white one to review.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 11:46 4

51. rantao333 (Posts: 209; Member since: 21 May 2013)


some prefer black note3, some prefer 1520 design, its a matter of choice.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 13:01 7

58. Ashoaib (Posts: 1408; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)


There is no comparison between note 3 n nokia 1520... note 3 has so much vast advantages over other phablets which are still hard to beat... reviewers usually adopt an approach where they usually use normal praise for samsung and over praise for others... all companies feel threatened from the superiority of samsung... crying baby iphone is so much threatened that it is using cheap tactics of cases in icourts... only company which is truely trying to match samsung is LG... others are far behind, nokia is no exception... nokia's phones do feel solid, so solid that it appears like old era brick phones. About premium finish claim of reviewer, well note 3 clearly looks more premium. May be reviewer got note 2 by mistake, thats why his praise of premium feeling of note 3 is under praised... about over pricing why everyone always forget that iphone has a hardware and specs of midrange phones and hold a price tag of future phone which may be will develop in the year 2020

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 08:15 15

2. MrKoles (Posts: 305; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)


If phablet, than the only one I choose is the Note line. Big display with numerous functions...congrats Samsung.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 09:50 12

31. PapaSmurf (Posts: 7714; Member since: 14 May 2012)


I honestly don't know what John is talking about. The Note 3 has a really bright screen. I can perfectly see clearly under direct sunlight with the brightness set at half or at auto.

Never regret buying this phone off contract.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 10:15 12

34. maherk (Posts: 801; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


True that. I have a note 3, and I live in sunny Dallas, and I never ever had a problem with the brightness of this phone, I just set it at automatic and I am good to go. The screen is so bright that I set the brightness at 1/4 when I am indoors. And when it comes to design, you can still notice notice how phonearena are still biased, the lg g2 is glossy plastic and they always have noe problem with it, but nooo samsung must be criticized in some way about their back plastic panel that can be replaced by leather/metal/carbon fiber and even wood panels for less than 10$ off ebay.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 10:47

37. Commentator (Posts: 2332; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


"...an uninspired, plastic design... without any fancy appearance characteristics to make it stand out in any positive way... the occasional creaking sounds made by the back sure are irritating."

From the G2 review's design section. Doesn't seem like they have "no problem" with it.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 12:56 3

57. maherk (Posts: 801; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


I made a comparison between the review you just mentioned and other reviews where the g2 was compared to other handsets. You can go and check it by yourself, they gave the G2 heads up in the others, and I pointed out that it was hypocritical. And guess what, I got my comment deleted and recieved a warning.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 15:12 2

67. Commentator (Posts: 2332; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


Fair enough. At any rate, you make a good point about the S4/N3's replaceable back. At least if you don't like plastic, you can replace it with something else.

posted on 30 Nov 2013, 08:31

89. gamblor77 (Posts: 71; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)


He obviously did not have it on auto brightness. Samsung changed their auto brightness option to crank the brightness well past the regular 100% mark while in very bright light.
Here is an excerpt from displaymate who are very reliable:

--"Impressive Brightness -
Up until the Galaxy Note 3, OLED displays have been somewhat to significantly dimmer than competing LCD displays. The Note 3 has changed that in a big way…it’s an impressive 55 percent brighter than the Note II and a solid 25 percent brighter than the Galaxy S4. For most image content it provides over 400 cd/m2, comparable or higher than most LCD displays in this size class. Even more impressive is that when Automatic Brightness is turned on, the Note 3 hits an incredible 660 cd/m2 in high ambient light, where it’s needed (85 percent brighter than the Note II and 40 percent brighter than the Galaxy S4 with Automatic Brightness) – the brightest mobile display we have ever tested in the Shoot-Out series. An impressive achievement for OLEDs!"--

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 08:19 2

4. xperiaDROID (Posts: 5225; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)


It's hard to choose, both are great phones!

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 08:22 3

6. sbw44 (Posts: 382; Member since: 04 Dec 2012)


lol I knew it even before I read the review! If its not android it wont win! Why dont you guys stop being so biased and review whats in front of you!

I bet if the 1520 had 10 days battery life it still would have lost because it does not run android!

posted on 14 Dec 2013, 15:25

90. Bioload25 (Posts: 193; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)


The thing is that android is indeed a more developed OS with tons of features and possibilities,and windows phone is still growing and somehow fits better in low end devices
nobody said that windows phone is crap or that android is the best,but,let us be realistic,marketplace cant compete with google play yet,and the system as a whole has several things to improve,like notification system,'fast configurations' (i mean,little switchs to turn on or off wifi,bluetooth,gps,etc, present on android) and other minor things that can be enhaced for a better user experience

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 08:24 6

7. sergiobr (Posts: 402; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)


1520 is wp and low light camera. Note 3 is everything you allways wanted from a smartphone. I´m still discovering new things to do with it. Gorgeous smartphone. If you want a good camera ...buy a camera. By the way, I´ve a Nokia 808. No wp !

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 08:38 2

15. sbw44 (Posts: 382; Member since: 04 Dec 2012)


Why do you have a 808 then and not a camera? how stupid can you be!

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 08:51 3

18. sergiobr (Posts: 402; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)


You must be very dumb. I have an old Nokia (better than wp) and obviously ... a camera too. And Note 3. You should try, will make you clever.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 08:31 5

12. fanboy1974 (Posts: 1150; Member since: 12 Nov 2011)


I still remember when people made fun of the original Note's size. Now it's got phones above it. But Samsung is still the granddaddy of the phablet.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 08:55 15

19. sbw44 (Posts: 382; Member since: 04 Dec 2012)


1520 is better for me because of :
Better screen
Better camera
Better build quality
Better design
Better navigation
Better audio capture
Wireless charging
Longer battery life
And way better exclusive apps like Refocus,Cinemagraph, City Lens etc!

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 11:12 4

44. Long1 (banned) (Posts: 399; Member since: 18 May 2013)


Then why don't you sell your iphone and buy Nokia 1520.

By the way the whole list that you wrote is WRONG.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 11:45 6

50. rantao333 (Posts: 209; Member since: 21 May 2013)


he is right actually. and there is nothing to do with an iphone here

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 13:25 6

60. Ashoaib (Posts: 1408; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)


Better screen? Did you have ever seen and compared videos on both screens? I am 100% sure you didnt, or if you did then may be you were without specticles and have a blured vision during watching on note 3... better camera? Both cameras are very nearly close despite a big difference is mega pixel count... better design? Well nokia's design is an obvious design as compared to premium looks of note 3... better navigation? well in this sector google is the best but nokia is not far behind either... about wireless charging and longer bettery well I dont have anything to disagree, your point is valid here... about apps? well google store is light years ahead of WP in this sector

posted on 29 Nov 2013, 01:11 2

79. sbw44 (Posts: 382; Member since: 04 Dec 2012)


LOL dude here you go!

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Nokia-Lumia-1520-assertive-display-tech-shines-vs-iPhone-5-vs-Xperia-Z-Ultra-vs-Note-3_id48818

have you not read the review that when the sun goes down the 1520 thrives! and that's not just a close difference! Don't forget that the 1520 has loseless zoom as well as capturing RAW photo's!

Obvious that you mention Google being better at maps because of Google Maps! but the truth is Nokia Here maps has way better offline maps which is the most important feature!

posted on 29 Nov 2013, 02:51

84. livyatan (Posts: 679; Member since: 19 Jun 2013)


That was because the adapt display on the Note was turned off.

Trust me, even if Nokia is better visible outside, Note 3 is still more than adequate in that regard.

In the all important display merits, the Note 3 is outstanding.

Here's a true expert analysis for you:

http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note3_ShootOut_1.htm

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 16:26 5

70. utg001 (Posts: 31; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)


Annnndd there is:
Office
XBox integration
SkyDrive integration
Less lag on updating
better looking apps
.
I think Android is not gonna win me back any time soon

posted on 29 Nov 2013, 12:55 2

86. Nizamani.Zulqi (Posts: 1; Member since: 29 Nov 2013)


same here bro , looking forward for first windows to own and that will be 1520

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 09:02 11

20. Ikechukwu (Posts: 134; Member since: 03 Oct 2011)


Whoops. Lumia 1520 for me

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 09:04 10

21. fouadqr (Posts: 287; Member since: 21 Nov 2012)


1520 for me :)

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 11:17 3

45. Long1 (banned) (Posts: 399; Member since: 18 May 2013)


Wow
If someone read your commens here iboys, will get impression that most of the ppl like Nokia 1520 better than Note 3. And that Nokia will outsell Note 3. LOL

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 11:45 3

49. rantao333 (Posts: 209; Member since: 21 May 2013)


why? he dint said anything? he just express his choice. keep ur hate for urself

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 09:23 6

24. jraymp (Posts: 2; Member since: 27 Nov 2013)


Nokia Lumia 1520 for me.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 09:24 5

25. Carlitos (Posts: 309; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


Note 3 hands down. Only phone in the market besides the note 2 itself that utilizes the screen size with great features and cutting edge tech. And its much much more comfortable, even for a phone if its size.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 09:25 4

26. zuckerboy (Posts: 898; Member since: 22 Dec 2011)


note 3 is definition for what phablet is... 1520 is good but wp is killing it.... nokia's apps is good btw.... itdoesnt mean this is phablet just because device has big screen....

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 09:28 6

27. adecvat (Posts: 122; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)


Note 3 FTW

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 09:49 6

30. mousesports (Posts: 243; Member since: 28 Feb 2013)


Lumia 1520 NOKIA FTW

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 10:17 2

35. Commentator (Posts: 2332; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


"Faux-pas" leather? Don't you just mean "faux?"

Man, what a faux-pas!

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 10:50 5

38. papss (unregistered)


I have a note 3 but would trade it for a 1520 tbh because the os..

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 11:02 4

42. Long1 (banned) (Posts: 399; Member since: 18 May 2013)


It's sarcasm? Right?

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 11:43 3

47. rantao333 (Posts: 209; Member since: 21 May 2013)


no, he mean it.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 12:07 4

53. papss (unregistered)


Not at all sir. I like the note 3 but do not like the os.. my space isn't for me.

posted on 29 Nov 2013, 02:39

82. livyatan (Posts: 679; Member since: 19 Jun 2013)


Troll!

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 11:01 4

41. Long1 (banned) (Posts: 399; Member since: 18 May 2013)


Nokia has no chace here.
Note 3 is best in everything. Black version of Note 3 is much more beautifull that the Nokia brick. And S-Pen just nail the 1520's coffin.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 11:43 5

48. rantao333 (Posts: 209; Member since: 21 May 2013)


it's sarcasm? right?

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 12:09 2

54. papss (unregistered)


While the note 3 is the first ss with a good design it's by no means premium. The plastic rim coated chrome is super cheap.

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 11:42 3

46. rantao333 (Posts: 209; Member since: 21 May 2013)


1520 anytime!

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 13:27 2

61. nasznjoka (Posts: 328; Member since: 05 Oct 2012)


this review is amistake. Howcome you compare the 'big' phone to Note 3?

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 19:30

71. nxl2610 (Posts: 49; Member since: 14 Aug 2013)


I know bashing Samsung is a trend now ,but no matter the hate ,Sammy will always raise to the top .Sale figures said it all :)

posted on 28 Nov 2013, 19:50

72. orielwindow (Posts: 92; Member since: 23 Sep 2010)


I've been very underwhelmed with my Note 3. Compared to my Note 2 the camera doesn't seem like much of an upgrade and the reception for wifi and cell signal has been actually much, much worse than my Note 2 (the constant zero bars in a rural setting and "You are disconnected" followed by "Connected to wifi...." notifications make web browsing a nightmare.) I'm reluctantly returning it and trying a different phablet, hopefully one that has better reception.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories