Technology has reached a state where making phone calls is far from a phone's most frequently used feature. Instead, people use their phones to look up stuff on the web, to access social networks, and, of course, to take photos and videos. That's why manufacturers invest a lot of time and effort in equipping their phones with quality cameras.

Apple, in particular, has been treating its iPhone to camera upgrades with each consecutive generation. Unlike others, however, the company has never been into the megapixel race – as the iPhone 5s and the iPhone 5 before them, the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus have 8-megapixel main cameras. To put this into perspective, most other popular phones have cameras of 13 to 20 megapixels. But as we've often said, megapixels aren't all that matters in a camera, and Apple is perfectly aware of that. That's why the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus sport an upgraded sensor which enables better low-light performance and faster auto-focus. Still, will this be enough for the new iPhones to beat or match the performance of other flagship phones? Well, we're about to answer this question in our latest camera comparison.

We've chosen to stack up the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus against some of the best smartphones in town. These are the Samsung Galaxy S5, the LG G3, the Nokia Lumia 1520, the Sony Xperia Z2, and the HTC One (M8). And let's not forget Apple's previous flagship, the iPhone 5s. It will be a tough fight, but who knows, perhaps the new iPhones have a trick or two up their sleeves. But before we look at any photos, here's what these phones have to offer in terms of specs:


We bet you're expecting to see identical performance from the cameras on the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus. And you're absolutely correct if you do – their daytime samples have turned out splendid, and we don't see any difference in quality between the two phones' photos. On top of that, color reproduction in the iPhones' images is excellent. Colors are vivid and eye-pleasing, without being blown out of proportion, as other cameras have a tendency of doing. Take a look at the samples below and see what we mean. Notice how in the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus photos flower petals look vibrant and natural with their colors? Most other phones have increased the saturation and contrast in their photos to a point where the same color hues appear overly bright.

The iPhone 5s does not lag far behind. Colors in its photos are a bit warmer and more saturated, but still within tolerable limits. And we like how the sky's shade of blue has been captured to appear naturally, not overexposed.

The Nokia Lumia 1520 has a lot of potential and is one of the better performers in this race, but its results are rather inconsistent. Some of its photos have excellent color balance and accuracy, while others turn out overly warm or cold. Colors are neutral to vivid, but shades that are bright in real life could end up oversaturated in the produced image.

Sony's Xperia Z2 has its own opinion about things. With colors, in particular, its camera keeps their saturation at a neutral, almost washed-out level, with a slight cold-ish tone in several scenes. This might appeal to some people, yet those who'd rather have a bit more vibrancy in their images might be left underwhelmed.

The Samsung Galaxy S5's camera has a tendency to lean towards the colder side, as is typical for most of Samsung's cameras, actually. That's especially noticeable in shades of red, which appear slightly pink-ish. Color saturation is slightly boosted, and we're okay with that.

Shooting with the LG G3 produces vivid, colorful images. Perhaps their color saturation could have been not as intense, but we'd take them as they are. Some scenes appear colder or warmer than they should, but the deviation is slight and doesn't bother us.

The HTC One (M8) could have done better. Some scenes have their colors reproduced neutrally, but in others, there's some serious skewing going on. In our samples below, shades of orange appear yellow, shades of yellow appear white, and the sky's blue hue is very unnatural. Also, we noticed that its camera increases color saturation way too much in cloudy scenes.



4. RudioX

Posts: 13; Member since: Jun 07, 2009

Not bad the new iPhone Flex is doing great, oups the iPhone 6 Plus, sorry!

153. ShenAlJoker

Posts: 113; Member since: Jul 19, 2013

Nice one!!!! But where is moto x and z3????

160. spin9

Posts: 310; Member since: May 31, 2014

From PA comparison april 14 2014 S5 scores: Color - 8.5 now 8 Detail - 8.5 now 9 indoor - 7.5 now 5!! Night - 7.5 now 5!! Video - 7.5 now 8.5 Interesting no??

171. SuperAndroidEvo

Posts: 4888; Member since: Apr 15, 2011

Wow they removed my post. WOW! Again they show a black Note 3 yet it's not included in this comparison. I mean if the iPhone 5s is included, why isn't the Note 3 included? Also why are the numbers so different from the other comparison, as spin9 has posted??? Fishy... +1

180. E.N.

Posts: 2610; Member since: Jan 25, 2009

Because the scores are relative to which phones are being tested. Doesn't take a genius...

193. kevin91202

Posts: 642; Member since: Jun 08, 2014

"Because the scores are relative to which phones are being tested. Doesn't take a genius..." -E.N. And it doesn't take a genius to realize that if the scores were indeed relative to each other, then there should be scores of 10's and 1's. I don't see any of those. Hence, the scores are not actually relative to each other. Simple math.

199. E.N.

Posts: 2610; Member since: Jan 25, 2009

Regardless of why they aren't using a 1-10 scale, it's still absolutely clear the scores are relative, hence "Camera Comparison". If the scores were truly absolute, there would be criteria for each numerical score in each camera category, independent of which other phones were tested.

197. maelisone

Posts: 1; Member since: May 28, 2012

if it's really like this how its works , they will put the best phone = 10 in the individual test and others 9 8 7 .....

181. kristoferallen

Posts: 99; Member since: Jun 23, 2010

If the concert is at night, how would it make sense for there not to be a lot of lights?....

182. steodoreben

Posts: 379; Member since: Sep 26, 2013

@SuperAndroidEvo I can relate to you. PhoneArena deleted my previous comment too which talks about "They did not include Sony Z3 because it is no match to iPhone 6, not to mention they created the sensors for iPhones for years"

183. imran86

Posts: 208; Member since: Sep 14, 2012

A quick question for PA: Do you believe in freedom of speech? if so, why is every of my post deleted from the comments section? I only said this article contradicts with one of your own that had blind camera comparisons which i thought you didn't remember. I say it again. You are pathetic PA.

191. kevin91202

Posts: 642; Member since: Jun 08, 2014

PA is becoming more and more pro-Apple/anti-Samsung. Just like CNET. Have you noticed CNET's 1-week coverage of the 2014 iPhone 6+ vs the 2013 Note 3? It's as if the Note 4 doesn't exist. It's quite comical

173. srgonu

Posts: 568; Member since: Feb 13, 2012

Things change at PA when iPhone is IN ;)

176. jsdechavez

Posts: 818; Member since: Jul 20, 2012

The Lumia wins in low light (esp in that 50% voucher crop)..whatever this website does.

187. datguyglad

Posts: 98; Member since: Aug 29, 2014

Yeah it's no secret PA is iPhone biased. Like @spin9 posted up, the scores for the S5 changed from thier scores last year.?? It's the same phone so why..??

195. bur60

Posts: 981; Member since: Jul 07, 2014

The z1 had 7,66 average rating. How can the Z2 get a 7 with a better camera than Z1?? And again outdated flagship for Sony

216. iwalk

Posts: 2; Member since: Oct 07, 2014

Friend, think of it this way... lets suppose they gave the sony z1 an average rating of 8, then the z2 was released and it was a better phone so they gave it 9, then the z3 was released and obviously it will be better that its predecessor so they gave it 10 out of 10. the question now is, what will they give the z4 if they released it next year and if sony made it better than the z3 ? 11 out of 10 ?? u see how is that not rational ? so obviously they give a rating for the phone based on its rivals, how well its doing against other competitors ? so z1 had 7,66 based on how well it was doing 'back at that time', and z2 got 7 based on its rivals at the time they released it

210. saurabhkumarshs

Posts: 2; Member since: Oct 08, 2014

yeah.. completely biased comparison to advertise iphone 6 i think.

202. jamesng

Posts: 1; Member since: Oct 03, 2014

re: video on lumia 1520 "And the sound is quieter than it should be. In fact we can barely hear our own voice in the video."-->maybe it's because directional sound is turned on? in which case sound from behind the phone is not recorded... and so much noise on the iphone 6. some of the other phones may have white balance issues, but you can tweak it by changing one setting (don't give me the bs of all auto; the phone has that function for a reason). You can't minimise noise (well you can but you'll destroy the pic...might as well use my old lg viewty).

207. baghdadguy

Posts: 1; Member since: Oct 07, 2014

I don't Know if this site Phone Arena OR IPHONE Arena

209. Jimrod

Posts: 1605; Member since: Sep 22, 2014

There were lots of brands of phones in the test... Oh, you mean because the iPhone won? And if it wins a test the site must be biased, but if an Android device wins it's fair? I see. Great logic.

5. Antimio

Posts: 313; Member since: Nov 11, 2013

Credit where its due. Apple takes great pictures. Period. (And I'm a Nexus guy)

11. Finalflash

Posts: 4063; Member since: Jul 23, 2013

It would be easier to accept the results if PhoneArena was not so biased in Apple coverage. The issue is that you can manually mess up the image for one camera or another to accentuate your advertised choice. I have tested the iPhone 5 and 5s myself and the pictures they take a subpar compared to what they show here. I have compared them to the S5, S4, PFI and Nexus 5 and the best by far was the PFI, then S4, S5, 5s, N5, and 5. Also, a control should be present taken with a DSLR.

16. ihavenoname

Posts: 1693; Member since: Aug 18, 2013

On the other hand, you are biased against Apple, so nobody can't tell if you are speaking truth.

17. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

I speak the truth! I can prove it: People on this site call me a little kid. Everybody knows that truth comes out of the kids' mouths. :)

39. RebelwithoutaClue unregistered

Shut up, the grownups are talking lol

77. SuperAndroidEvo

Posts: 4888; Member since: Apr 15, 2011

I can vouch... ArtSim98 SPEAKS the TRUTH!!! +1 for speaking the truth!

158. E.N.

Posts: 2610; Member since: Jan 25, 2009

You're exactly right, his past comments have shown he is clearly biased. "I have tested the iPhone 5 and 5s myself and the pictures they take a subpar compared to what they show here." - according to him, Phonearena somehow managed to make the 5S take better pictures than its really suppose to... that's a pretty interesting accusation.

48. Pattyface

Posts: 1658; Member since: Aug 20, 2014

How is it that in every apple article you find a way to discredit anything that is written. If you hate this site and MANY others that have the same results then go somewhere else. Accept or respect their articles for once instead of being a female dog

66. synot

Posts: 277; Member since: Sep 14, 2012

APPLE ALWAYS WIN ON PHONE ARENA.Galaxy S5 photos looks better than Apple new phones.Everyone knows that S5 takes the best photos apart from Note 4. nex

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless