Lumia Black update improves color accuracy on the Nokia Lumia 925's camera
A published report on Friday compared pictures taken by a Nokia Lumia 925 before and after the update. And the bottom line is that colors appear to be more accurately reproduced after the update.
We've included some of the comparisons in the slideshow below. Compare the pictures taken before ("Amber") and after ("Black") the installation of the update. Keep in mind that the Nokia Lumia 925 offers a PureView camera and you might not see results like this with all Lumia phones after the update. Whether you have an eye for photography or not, your comments are welcome just the same.
Comparison of pictures taken with a Nokia Lumia 925 before and after the Lumia Black update Fullscreen
More popular slideshows
iOS 7 release date and time are today (Sep 18), get ready to update!
18 Sep 2013, 04:00
Spring chickens: Samsung Galaxy S5 vs Sony Xperia Z2 comparison preview
26 Feb 2014, 09:37
Samsung Galaxy S5: all you need to know
24 Feb 2014, 17:06
Samsung Galaxy S5 rumor round-up: release date, price and specs
12 Feb 2014, 08:58
Sony Xperia Z2 display analyzed: large color gamut, excellent color accuracy
28 Feb 2014, 05:29
Comparison of pictures taken with a Nokia Lumia 925 before and after the Lumia Black update
source: AAWP via WMPoweruser
1. Extradite (banned) (Posts: 316; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)
So every phones are controlled by Oem to make the camera to take a sharper better picture... How funny. So Digital and Dslr don't need updates. So isn't there a device where no updates are required, but given a quality camera. Even the 1020 relys on software updates. So you rather better of buying Adobe photoshop, or other apps to make progress.....
2. PapaSmurf (Posts: 5770; Member since: 14 May 2012)
There's always that one person that complains about everything.. Smh.
3. Extradite (banned) (Posts: 316; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)
Not complaining, but trying to figure out....infos
5. hulk_14 (Posts: 28; Member since: 14 Dec 2013)
The best format of pictures to make them better in graphic apps is RAW. Only Nokia Lumias have currently RAW support.
6. Shatter (Posts: 1744; Member since: 29 May 2013)
Androids camera API is getting a huge update on an unknown date that will make it so a Nokia quality camera can actually go on an android phone and that new API supports RAW.
8. hulk_14 (Posts: 28; Member since: 14 Dec 2013)
We will live, we will see. Currently google (android) can only polish Nokia's (WP) shoes.
10. SleepingOz (Posts: 2357; Member since: 22 Oct 2011)
You're delusional if you actually believe that.
13. hulk_14 (Posts: 28; Member since: 14 Dec 2013)
You're delusional if you actually don't believe that.
7. Penny (Posts: 951; Member since: 04 Feb 2011)
When we say "digital" cameras, it's important to remember that more goes into the image quality than just the optics. Two cameras with the same sensors and the same lenses can produce different results because one may have a better software process that produces better image files. This is true for professional digital cameras as well, not just smartphones -- that's why you'll see so many people in the enthusiast camera market that care about firmware updates.
Smartphone cameras are severely limited in quality by physical limitations, therefore it is in the manufacturer's best interest to at least try to keep improving what they can on the software side.
Finally, Photoshop and other apps are what you would call "post-processing," meaning editing that takes place after the image file is created. When you're working with smartphones, you are largely working with JPEG files, which are files that have already been processed and altered by the phone's software. This means that Photoshop does not have the raw data to work with in the first place. You might be able to do a better job with Photoshop if you were working with RAW files, which right now only Nokia provides.
9. Extradite (banned) (Posts: 316; Member since: 30 Dec 2013)
Adobe photoshop is much much better than Raw. Expensive
17. elitewolverine (Posts: 462; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
Adobe is much better than RAW?
RAW is not a program, it is a format that Adobe supports and loves.
From your first post to this one, it is very apparent that you are not fully aware of Digital Photography.
Also when you talk about DSLR's, the d is for Digital, it serves info in 0's and 1's. All SOFTWARE.
15. yazbuh (Posts: 24; Member since: 21 Jun 2012)
How funny i bet you don't know nothing about cameras or you don't even have one... They do have firmware updates, for your info.... My counsin's Canon EOS 5D Mark III got firmware updates, my Canon ixus 240 HS also got firmware update... How funny of you...
4. papss (Posts: 2842; Member since: 03 Sep 2012)
It doesn't need the update but enhances them if you do. A camera is just that.. A camera and no matter how nice it is it will always be a camera but the phones do more therefore software is a big part to them.
11. corporateJP (Posts: 1185; Member since: 28 Nov 2009)
Ernie wants his duck back and you dudes are suspect, taking pictures of knitted dogs at craft shows and what-not...
14. Mfa901 (Posts: 32; Member since: 14 Jul 2012)
if an update improve the picture quality than it means they have added some effects which will improve the pic instantly when it is clicked.....
so its same thing your choice u do it using a photoshop or your phone do it own self..
after all they cannot change the camrra hardwere by an update its just a change in the effects