Image, specs, and price of an LG G4c leak out, it's a smaller, less powerful G4
1. maximumpayne (Posts: 13; Member since: 13 Jan 2012)
1gb of ram for flagship mini in 2015 ? Seriously ?
14. JaneChenLong (Posts: 374; Member since: 18 Mar 2015)
Snapdragon 410 for mini flagship???
LG is losing their mind.
2. haikallp (Posts: 187; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
1GB ram again? Wtf LG. Only Sony seems to understand.
7. BaffledTruffle (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Dec 2013)
Well, flagship minis are basically dumbed down versions of flagships.
While Sony's compacts are basically squished flagships with a screen downgrade (but with the size, it doesn't really matter).
21. may_czos (Posts: 712; Member since: 22 Nov 2014)
Yes but not as much. Those specs were acceptable for a midrangers 2 years ago but now they mean low end device. Why would someone buy expensive and weak G4C over G3s or Magna LTE?
22. buccob (Posts: 2512; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
Exactly... even the Galaxy S4 (FOUR) mini has 1.5 GB of RAM...
11. duartix (Posts: 287; Member since: 01 Apr 2014)
No, it's far worse.
It's nearly the same as the G2 mini. :P
6. maherk (Posts: 3420; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
No one can do minis like Sony, although Samsung are catching up with them.
10. Planterz (Posts: 2014; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)
Sony makes compacts. Everybody else makes minis. It's weird that this distinction has autogenetically been established, but there's a clear definition between a mini and a compact now.
13. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
Eh. I had both the Alpha and Z3 compact and I sold the Z3 compact in one week and just recently sold my Alpha.
The Exynos Alpha with almost the same processor as the Note 4 flew and was gorgeous. Sure it didn't have waterproofing or the huge battery but neither do most 2015 flagships.
The Alpha was crazier than the Z3 compact where it counts. 20nm state if the art chip set and sexy and slim 6.8mm design. It was much nicer than the chunky Z3 compact.
Of course I ended up using the regular 5.2 inch Z3 over both, mainly because I need 1080p and thin. But if I were to pick one compact, I would pick the Alpha over the Z3 compact any day. The Alpha had thin and the Z3 compact had neither.
The Alpha flat out flew, was gorgeous, and the battery surprisingly lasted for such a small battery.
16. pyradark (Posts: 824; Member since: 10 Jun 2012)
The chunky you calling is more compact than any flagship phone, dual stereo speaker, waterproof, 20MP camera and got the best battery life, 3 days than your 1 day sammy
23. buccob (Posts: 2512; Member since: 19 Jun 2012)
"where it counts" FOR YOU...
"chunky Z3 Compact" wow... so now 8.6 mm is chunky...
In my opinion extremely thin devices are actually very uncomfortable to hold... Even my "chunky" Z3 Compact feels a bit better (regarding a safe hold) with its Ringke Fusion case... though sometimes I take it off, the feel is nicer without it.
What it really counts IMO is not the slightly better performance of the Alpha, but actually the waterproofing capabilities since my phone has already taken quite a few showers, immersions, raindrops and splashes, be it on purpose or accidentally.
Also while the camera on the Alpha is very good and actually surpasses the Z3C on certain situations, the Z3C has better Slow Motion, video recording and Low Light images, specially when you learn to use its modes.
For me also counts having an eyelet hole for wrist straps because that prevents falls, and its better than having a case (and hoping it doesn't break if it falls)... it's been almost a MUST feature for me and my phones for a while, and sadly only Sony still offers it.
Finally 32GB is enough for most people, but I live in a country with s**tty internet so Cloud services are use limited (for docs and maybe pictures, but not for music or video) so I keep large amounts of music and movies on my devices and having an SD card slot is also a must for me.
PS: I did recommend the Alpha to a couple of friends... both were still using the Galaxy S2... One of them actually got the Z1 Compact and the other might in fact get the Alpha
8. vuyonc (Posts: 987; Member since: 24 Feb 2014)
"LG copy/pastes the Magna; Sony, Motorola and the Chinese are not worried" should be the article title.
12. duartix (Posts: 287; Member since: 01 Apr 2014)
It's the same chipset in essence. That's why a lot of people are buzzing.
15. nebula (Posts: 518; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)
I stopped reading at " 5-incher with 720 x 1280 pixel resolution"
17. medicci37 (Posts: 1271; Member since: 19 Nov 2011)
To have less power then their newest duel core they had to go with something really weak.
18. drazwy (Posts: 190; Member since: 15 Jan 2014)
YES! Just what everyone asked for! Less of everything!
20. may_czos (Posts: 712; Member since: 22 Nov 2014)
I'm seriously disappointed, I was waiting for SD610/615, 2GB od RAM, FHD display and 13MPix camera. Lower specs than in the G4 but still decent midranger. SD410 and 1GB od RAM is not a midranger now, it's a low end phone. No progress from G2 mini, basically identical specs you can find in much cheaper LG G3s or Spirit/Magna.
25. BaffledTruffle (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Dec 2013)
why not buy a G3 instead? Or a G2? You'd have better off performance with those two.