First 64-bit Samsung phone gets benchmarked, sports a Snapdragon 410 chip
1. verbalize (Posts: 122; Member since: 03 May 2013)
Lol.. And here is Samsung late to the party again..
7. Astoni (Posts: 649; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)
Heard apple came late this time around also ;)
9. Ashoaib (Posts: 3229; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)
do you mean with their phablet? yes, very very late, copy cats usually are
10. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 12941; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
Heard apple has nothing to do with this
38. VZWuser76 (Posts: 4180; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)
Then who is Apple copying? You always comment implying that others are late, copying, or in some way inferior. And the implication is always comparing them to Apple, which you have stated as your OS of choice. Yet whenever anyone brings Apple into this due to your comments, you state that isn't what this is about. But when a "fandroid" as you've called them comments in an Apple article you have no problem bashing Android. So please answer me how that is different? Different sets of rules for different people doesn't work and is one of the main things wrong with this country.
If you're going to use Apple as the standard by which you judge other companies, then you have to be prepared to have them scrutinized as well.
53. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 12941; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
Define late. A lot of the features present in iOS 8 were already in beta through jailbreaking. Apple gradually releases features so people can properly enjoy them and utilize them. They don't release features out of the blue just to release them.
Adding features, as proven by Samsung with their constant levels of bloat that no one will probably use, doesn't always make for a pleasant user experience.
8. hung2900 (Posts: 956; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)
What the f***?
This one is a Qualcomm SoC.
What a brain less sh*ep!
11. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 12941; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
I don't give a fudge what it is. It's still Samsung using a 64 bit chip
14. Astoni (Posts: 649; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)
I don't mind any company copying others but to say that the copied apple cause they started using 64bit is a bit of a stupid statement.. that means that everything apple is bringing into iOS and has the latest 2 major updates has been copied from Android and WP..
that also means that apple copied 64-bit architecture aswell.. and don't forget that samsung made those chipsets..
It seems to me that you went from apple fan to fullblown dumbass.
23. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 12941; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
If Apple never used a 64bit chip you really think Samsung would've used one?
Don't be ignoramuses.
27. iushnt (Posts: 1679; Member since: 06 Feb 2013)
"If Apple never used a 64bit chip you really think Samsung would've used one?"
I'm sure they would.
I agree to Astoni (Post 14), you were a good apple fan before and wouldn't bother android or Samsung. Dunno what happened to you.
32. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 12941; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
I don't. I just give my opinion like everyone else.
44. VZWuser76 (Posts: 4180; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)
And others are giving their opinions as well. But theirs are ignorant and yours are correct? You can't cur through your arrogance with a plasma cutter.
At some point the industry would've gone to 64 bit, it's the next logical progression. The PC industry has been using 64 bit OS and chips for years, Apple didn't invent it. So just as the PC industry migrated from 32 to 64 bit, so is the mobile industry. If apple hadn't have been first, someone else would've.
The difference is no one believed it was a necessary step at this point, and truthfully it isn't. How much has migrating to 64 bit helped how the device runs? Any gains could've as easily been accomplished by stepping up to a stronger CPU or more RAM. And now developers have to start moving their apps over to 64 bit ahead of schedule.
The main reason Apple went to it was as a selling point. It's no different than 2 & 4k TVs, without the content you're not seeing any benefits until the rest of the industry starts offering content that they can make use of it.
There's the argument that it future proofs the device. But in the case of mobile, how many are still going to have the first 64 bit device when the industry can really make use of it? Anymore people are shocked when someone has a 2 year old phone, so that isn't a very valid argument.
Either way, Apple didn't create 64 bit, they simply used it as a selling point. And with the way business is today, if you don't have it as well you're falling behind, whether the feature is useful or not. It happened with 720/1080 screens, 3D, 4G and LTE, and now with wearables and water resistance. Every time someone comes out with a new feature, the industry jumps on it and it's the next must have thing. How useful they are could be determined by the consumer, or they could very well be following the "heard mentality" and buying because they think they need it when in fact they might never use it.
59. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)
He's just a blind sad lil fan boy. probably in his teens or something. He worsphips APPLE and hate's copy cats you can always ignore people like him.
63. gallitoking (Posts: 4718; Member since: 17 May 2011)
Wow you do the same but with Android, irony
36. wilsong17 (unregistered)
idiot 64 b mobile was in progress since 2012 or 2011 they made report about it do a simple google search
70. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)
Mxyzptlk as always is unable to reasonable his bulls**t statements...
65. tedkord (Posts: 11607; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
Because the tech in smartphones hasn't followed the tech in desktops, right? ARM announced 64-bit CPUs a year before the iPhone 5s was announced. In fact, if ARM hadn't done the initial legwork, there'd be no 64-bit A8.
67. VZWuser76 (Posts: 4180; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)
Intel had 64 bit long before that. My old Asus laptop that I bought when Vista launched (don't laugh) was 64 bit. I still use it so I know it's on there. And Vista launched quite a few years ago. But your point is correct. The PC industry comes out with something, and when they can jam it in a smaller mobile device, they do. Same with WiFi, first on laptops, then on smartphones.
24. Iodine (Posts: 1330; Member since: 19 Jun 2014)
Ok so if they were just coping all those features from android for the last 2 years how will you explain to me that google is coping those features back wothleslly, as they already have them ?
And aehm they copied an 64-bit architecture from who ? Oh from the distant future I forgot....
49. VZWuser76 (Posts: 4180; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)
As I said earlier, 64 bit is a natural progression for the industry. A smartphone is basically a mini laptop with calling capabilities, and laptops have had 64 bit for years now. It's no different than moving from a single to dual to quad core processor, as the demands on the device get stronger, a more powerful CPU is required. The problem is, we aren't at that time yet, which is why even almost a year after it was offered, the industry is moving at a snail's pace to optimize for 64 bit. If we were in a crunch, the progression would be much faster than it is.
18. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10456; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Funny because if you really want to go there, the S2 has been sporting the features of iOS 8 for three years now.
22. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 12941; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
Do you want to do this PapaSmurf? You've never given me any trouble about my Samsung comments.
46. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3689; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)
Of course, In the small world of an iSheeeeep, his tech knowledge is limited to Apple's A chipset, or terms like "desktop class", "64 bit", "Axx is twice as faster than Ax", "Retina". Infact he gets so sheepppy that he forgets Apple A7 is manufactured by Samsung.
66. tedkord (Posts: 11607; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)
HAHA. Was that supposed to be intimidating? He's right, by the way.
19. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)
also heard they are usuing outdated software too.
28. vikingsfootball09 (Posts: 70; Member since: 02 Oct 2013)
TO Verbalize and Mxyzptlk >>>
apple doing 64bit with just 1gb of ram is nutz...not fully utilizing 64bit.
copycats? i think it makes more sense to have 3gb or more system ram that to have 512mb or 1gb.
- didnt apple use 4g/lte after android used it first?
- while apple was still using 512mb memory, android was using as much as 2gb...then apple finally stepped up to 1gb, while most android are now using 3gb
- while apple has been stuck at 4 inch screens before the 5s, most android have been doing atleast 5inch. now apple is finally gonna go the 5+ inch screen with their new iphones
- while motorolla atrix had fingerprint scanner more than 3yrs ago, apple copied on their 5s
- what about apples supposedly iwatch rumors over a year ago that apple fanbois were saying android will copy...but guess what? smartwatches were available even before apple hinted of making one of their own...and samsung is already on its way of making its third generetion of smartwatches.
- everything about ios7/8 is more like android than it is ios itself
- the list goes on and on and on my friend...apple is a copycat that apple fanbois like to play dumm n dummer...OMG OMG!!! HAHAHA!!!
39. Iodine (Posts: 1330; Member since: 19 Jun 2014)
You are bashing them so little it actually looks you praise them !
You are embarrassing the God Android !
61. vikingsfootball09 (Posts: 70; Member since: 02 Oct 2013)
iODINE>>> you praise apple so much for the copying that they do, its like watching ios8 keynote all over again.
57. pavsidhu (Posts: 214; Member since: 20 May 2014)
Not really, Samsung didn't copy Apple, Apple only made it to 64bit before Samsung and it's not like 64bit was never around before.
72. nikhilcr7vsmessi (Posts: 2; Member since: 08 Feb 2013)
They are always late !
Htc and Lenovo did it first !
2. antmiu2 (Posts: 312; Member since: 19 Jun 2011)
kinda pathetic since the samsung phone was on a 540x960 res and barely beat the moto g
4. Xperia_droid (Posts: 39; Member since: 07 Nov 2013)
But none of the apps are designed for 64bit . pretty gimmick like apple did last year.
20. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)
I prefer SNAPDRAGON 808 over this gimmick 64BIT processor
47. VZWuser76 (Posts: 4180; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)
Then why did apple wait so long to implement NFC if it wasn't necessary? But now that they've added it it's necessary? Double standard no?
52. joaolx (Posts: 364; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
They still haven't added NFC. With their iBeacons tool they don't need it. Although htat doesn't mean they won't use it in the future.
60. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)
if you're saying NFC is a gimmick? when IP6 has NFC u will say it will be the greatest feature on a Iphone with a outdate technology.
62. jacko1977 (Posts: 428; Member since: 11 Feb 2012)
airdrop is a renamed bluetooth
nfc is better then airdrop
64. iushnt (Posts: 1679; Member since: 06 Feb 2013)
If NFC was in Apple you wouldn't have called it gimmick and if Samsung have had brought 64-bit first you would have called it gimmick. you are not showing your opinion but fanboyism.
35. shuaibhere (Posts: 1986; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)
Since android apps run DVM...it's no prob...
ART too is 64 bit compatible...
So android is ready for 64 bit...
5. realjjj (Posts: 369; Member since: 28 Jan 2014)
What the hell are you expecting,this is a small core,replacing A7 in low and mid range devices. Besides, the benchmark is about the GPU shows nothing really about the core.
15. Astoni (Posts: 649; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)
yet Samsungs tech is inside apples iphones ;). Funny how the phone industry works isn't it :D
21. Iodine (Posts: 1330; Member since: 19 Jun 2014)
That's like implying a lumberjack is the better writer than Shakespeare, because it made wood for the paper for it's books = ridiculous.
30. vikingsfootball09 (Posts: 70; Member since: 02 Oct 2013)
to iodine>>> huh??? what??? eerrrr...
42. elitewolverine (Posts: 5183; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
It was a funny relation, your reaction is the exact reaction about Astoni.
48. Astoni (Posts: 649; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)
I have no idea what you're implying.. but i'll explain what i'm talking about.
He said that samsungs tech is no match for apples tech.. problem is that Apple designs some of its own technology while other companys create and manufacture apples ideas.. then apple buys those components. technically its not apples.
A good comparsion for this is Your father made you (designed the idea) then later on he wants your Kidney, but that up to you to decide cause you kind of evolved it on your own while your dad only gave you the blueprints on how you were going to be designed ;). (lets leave the mother out of this, its to complicated)
I tried to make as much sense as i could, it sounded better in my head xD.
45. Astoni (Posts: 649; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)
A bit yes, but you're still far off lodine. Try keeping sane while writing.. its a lot easier to understand you.
29. iushnt (Posts: 1679; Member since: 06 Feb 2013)
I suggest u to Google "Number 1 information technology company in the world."
31. vikingsfootball09 (Posts: 70; Member since: 02 Oct 2013)
samsung no mattch for apple tech?
do you know that samsung manufactures all kinds of tech componants that apple and the rest of the world uses? from home entertainment to home appliances, to computers and mobile devices...and even rockets/missles and everything else in the tech world. does apple even do close to what samsung does on a global scale? your so clueless ;o)
13. theoak (Posts: 324; Member since: 16 Nov 2011)
It is not just about a 64 bit chip though. What Apple also did is provide the API and programming environment to leverage the extra functionality offered by the 64 bit chip.
You can throw a 5 liter engine (or 64 bit chip) on a lawn mower (cell phone), but if you are working with the same 3 gears (or API and programming tools) you will not get any farther.
16. Astoni (Posts: 649; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)
I still think they should way unil android is actually being optimised for 64-bit arch.. even if it's able to boost the system a little.
43. Anonn (Posts: 230; Member since: 04 Jun 2014)
Android cant run, let alone optimizes, on 64 bit until the hardware is widely available. Remember this rule of thumb in computing, Hardware precedes software. In PCs, 64 bit processors were widely available and used Before windows 64 bit was available.