Samsung Galaxy S 4 shares PowerVR GPU with the Apple iPhone 5

Samsung Galaxy S 4 shares PowerVR GPU with the Apple iPhone 5
The Apple iPhone 5 will face a new challenger once the Samsung Galaxy S 4 gets introduced on Thursday.  Each phone is the flagship model of its respective platform, but a blog post from Imagination lets us in on a little secret: both the Apple iPhone 5 and the Samsung Galaxy S 4 will have a PowerVR GPU crunching the graphics on each phone.

Imagination said in its blog that the Samsung Galaxy S 4 would have the PowerVR SGX544 inside, paired with the Samsung Exynos 5410 Octa. Samsung uses the ARM produced Mali on the international version of the Samsung Galaxy S III, which is powered with the quad-core Samsung Exynos 4412. The U.S. carrier version of the phone features the Adreno 225 together with the dual-core 1.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960.

Meanwhile, the Apple iPhone 5 features the PowerVR SGX543 which is very similar to the PowerVR SGX544 on the Samsung Galaxy S 4. The only difference is that the SGX544 supports Microsoft's DirectX 9.3. Samsung plans on running the GPU at a faster clock speed and will use the same triple-core set up as used on the Apple iPhone.

So guys, perhaps we can use this knowledge that both the Apple iPhone 5 and the Samsung Galaxy S 4 both use a PowerVR GPU to just get a little closer. In the words of the late Rodney King, "Can we all get along?"

source: Imagination via AppleInsider

Related phones

iPhone 5
  • Display 4.0" 640 x 1136 pixels
  • Camera 8 MP / 1.2 MP front
  • Processor Apple A6, Dual-core, 1300 MHz
  • Storage 64 GB
  • Battery 1440 mAh(8h 3G talk time)
Galaxy S4
  • Display 5.0" 1080 x 1920 pixels
  • Camera 13 MP / 2 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 600, Quad-core, 1900 MHz
  • Storage 64 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 2600 mAh(17h 3G talk time)

FEATURED VIDEO

38 Comments

1. bojan

Posts: 188; Member since: Oct 06, 2012

Samsung the best why you guys keep bring the name iphone up when its dead there is no more iphone or apple why give them press when they are oudated dead company when they don't exist.

7. darkkjedii

Posts: 31001; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

C'mon dude you're putting a little too much mustard on it bro. Apple needs to step it up, but they're far from dead. Even with a 30+% drop in stock they're still the #2 most valuable company on earth. Hate em, but hate em realistically. Also according to the latest stock reports APPL still exists IJS.

17. Android4u

Posts: 456; Member since: Aug 16, 2012

What's up darkk. :)

33. darkkjedii

Posts: 31001; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

Hangin bro how's it goin?

24. UrbanPhantom

Posts: 949; Member since: Oct 30, 2012

What's with all the negative thumbs down to your comment? It seems that an army of brain dead android lovin' whores are running to the rescue each time you post a statement based on reality. Apple probably has enough reserve cash in the bank to purchase Google, Samsung, or both. A dead company is one without access or ownership of capital, or didn't you worthless Android peasants figure that out yet?

27. XPERIA-KNIGHT unregistered

bro i get what you're saying with apple having more money than most people, but once again, just because you have enough money to buy something does NOT mean you can jus go ahead and buy someone or something off. Since we're being "realistic" here, i'll say that you and anyone else who thinks apple can just "buy google" off, are complete fools... I, without a doubt, dont believe the desparation is that high for such a act

29. UrbanPhantom

Posts: 949; Member since: Oct 30, 2012

Apple has more than just a little money: it's reserve cash exceeds the annual GDP of many countries. Throw enough money around, and you can buy virtually anything: companies, land, even people. That isn't to say they should be allowed to purchase Google and/or Samsung, nor would it be wise to let them do so. I believe competition is essential, and good for consumers. It is the primary catalyst of technological inspiration, and innovation... Still, to refer to any company with that much wealth as being "dead", or ineffectual in any capacity, is to utter words that are far too ignorant to be ignored. I don't care if these folks love their operating system, or a particular corporate brand, they deserved to be kicked hard between the legs for making statements that are simply not in keeping with an intelligent and thoughtful frame of mind. If PhoneArena wants to keep mindless hoodlums around, then so be it. Stupid is as stupid does, and god almighty, some of yea are stupid as bricks...

34. darkkjedii

Posts: 31001; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

That's the hardcore bunch I guess. Your 3 reds probably came from them too. I'm just being realistic though, dudes saying apple is dead, they no longer exist. If that's true, then I'm pissed to hell and back that I missed their going outta business sale. We're slashing prices from wall to wall, no reasonable offer will be turned down lol.

31. johnbftl

Posts: 283; Member since: Jun 09, 2012

The day the iPhone 5 launched AAPL closed at $705.07. Today they closed at $428.35 That's a 40% loss there. They may not be dead yet, but are headed that way pretty fast. 40% in six months says investors no longer have faith in the product. They are not the number two most valuable company on earth. Apple ranks 18th worldwide in terms of revenue. Exxon Mobil was first, followed by Royal Dutch Shell, then Wal-Mart was third. People confuse stock value for actual monetary worth all the time. If you don't believe me, read it for yourself. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_companies_by_revenue#section_2

32. UrbanPhantom

Posts: 949; Member since: Oct 30, 2012

I was refering strictly to Apple's cash, not it's present stock value, compende? They had over 137 billion in cash stored up for a rainy day. I'm not refering to the PPS, which is something else entirely... They should give me at least half of that for defending them online ;o)

37. johnbftl

Posts: 283; Member since: Jun 09, 2012

Obviously you did not read that link. Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch Shell, and Wal-Mart all pulled in over $400 billion in net revenue last year. Apple pulled $156 billion, a lot of that has probably been paid out in the past six months to investors abandoning ship. Apple is bleeding money right now. They are a midrange company. They always have been if you follow annual revenue reports.

11. lovenyc8

Posts: 164; Member since: Mar 13, 2013

indeed Apple doesn't exist its the smallest underdog at the moment

2. Ninetysix

Posts: 2964; Member since: Oct 08, 2012

Lol @ last years graphics on a 2013 flagship phone.

4. HDShatter

Posts: 1021; Member since: Jan 17, 2013

Way better than adreno 320 thats on the current ones.

28. SkOne

Posts: 105; Member since: May 02, 2012

Adreno 225 not 320.

8. PhoneArenaUser

Posts: 5498; Member since: Aug 05, 2011

And what you will say if iPhone 5S or even iPhone 6 will come with the same PowerVR SGX543 which is already on iPhone 5?

10. HDShatter

Posts: 1021; Member since: Jan 17, 2013

If there is one thing Apple does right it is using powerful GPUs. This GPU is no sloch againist other flagships.

14. Aeires unregistered

Apple does one thing that they've capitalized on, optimizing the hardware to the software. If Samsung does the same with the S4, the average and even power user won't notice any problems in graphics or speed. Judging by how well the Note 2 runs, I think they've figured it out.

12. PhoneArenaUser

Posts: 5498; Member since: Aug 05, 2011

"Lol @ last years graphics on a 2013 flagship phone." iPhone 5 use SGX543 (Jan 2009) Samsung Galaxy S IV use SGX544 (Jun 2010) So what you will say now about last years graphics?

3. RaKithAPeiRiZ

Posts: 1488; Member since: Dec 29, 2011

so simply its still behind the A6x?

9. HDShatter

Posts: 1021; Member since: Jan 17, 2013

Comparing tablets to phones is like comparing desktop cards to laptop graphics cards...

18. RaKithAPeiRiZ

Posts: 1488; Member since: Dec 29, 2011

i can remember Samsung bragging about the S3 beating the iPad 3 last year , so vice versa

5. Ninetysix

Posts: 2964; Member since: Oct 08, 2012

Next big thing with last year's graphics!

15. ama3654

Posts: 295; Member since: Nov 27, 2012

SGX543(January 2009), SGX544(June 2010), SGX554(December 2010). What's your point?, read before you come here to troll. Samsung Galaxy S IV will be unveiled in hours to shine. SGX544 is clocked at 533 MHz, twice the speed of the OLD SGX543 on the iphone 5, combine that with the A15 cores and you get the speed of the ipad 4 on a Smartphone. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerVR

16. metalspy101

Posts: 105; Member since: Dec 15, 2012

Apple NOOB POWNED...SMH... THANKS FOR THE CLARIFICATION...

19. Hemlocke unregistered

Yes, and 3-4 hours of battery life.

20. Ninetysix

Posts: 2964; Member since: Oct 08, 2012

Thank you for the wiki link that proved my statement :)

21. omgWhatA

Posts: 2; Member since: Mar 13, 2013

doesn't mattet architecture is the same old gpu, with all the hype its using old crap and when the new iphone comes out with a new, that's a NEW gpu it will annihilate this pos. Imean even the adreno 330 and tegra 4 will beat it so don't try to be a smart ass when your not

22. ama3654

Posts: 295; Member since: Nov 27, 2012

For the moment, enjoy the most powerful phone on earth, when the others you mentioned are implemented then you can talk, for now just STFU!

25. omgWhatA

Posts: 2; Member since: Mar 13, 2013

you STFU this device won't even be out until tomorrow so we're all talking about devices of the future dumba$$

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.