Foldable phones will remain niche products, unless Apple makes one

Join the discussion
• 2mo ago
↵AltronLivez51 said:

Why? If you want to know what it is in Spanish, then Google translate the page. What would me typing it in Spanish prove exactly?


Gosh you people!!! When God was passing out brains, he surely must have ran out by the time he got to you.

You claimed to know Spanish, well I gave you the opportunity to prove it.

Like
Quote
• 2mo ago
↵iphoneisboss said:

Write all that again but in Spanish.

Earlier you said Samsung doesn't innovate, only copy? You sound like a fool because you know better.


Samsung copies what? Far less than Apple.

Samsung showed a working demo of a phone with a folding screen years ago. They also showed they were working on screens the roll up.


You think making a folding screen isn't innovative.


How about this you foolish little boy.

Samsung is the only oem who made earbud headphones that is. 2-way speaker system. It uses 2 real speakers vs that sorry @$$ AirPods or anything with Beats.


I just bought the Beats Studio Plus. They sound like crap. Typical Beats. All Nass lacking everything else. How can a brand new product sound worse than a product made by someone else and it cicts less.

You can get brand new Buds Pro for around $100 and they sound far better than anything Applle makes.


All reviews say the kbly thing Apple products are good at is the noise canceling and transparency modes. But you buy them for sound. What good is all that if they still sound like crap. The only single benefit to the AirPods is if you have an iPhone.


Samsing made their own 100MP camera. That's innovative. Apple doesn't make any cameras. They still buy Sony sensors.


The only thing about can brag about is their SoC. But if it was so powerful, then why do iPhone even now have a lower resolution screen vs my 4 year old Android?


Samsung has to be innovative by default because they design and manufacture their own products. Apple doesn't do any of that.


You know Samsung built the Burj Kalifa. It's has far more innovations than Apple's flightless saucer and it cost less money to build.


Let that sink in. The Burj Khalifa is more innovative and more advanced in other things other than its height, and it costed less money to build vs Apple's flightless saucer.

Like
1
Quote
• 2mo ago
↵AltronLivez51 said:

Earlier you said Samsung doesn't innovate, only copy? You sound like a fool because you know better.


Samsung copies what? Far less than Apple.

Samsung showed a working demo of a phone with a folding screen years ago. They also showed they were working on screens the roll up.


You think making a folding screen isn't innovative.


How about this you foolish little boy.

Samsung is the only oem who made earbud headphones that is. 2-way speaker system. It uses 2 real speakers vs that sorry @$$ AirPods or anything with Beats.


I just bought the Beats Studio Plus. They sound like crap. Typical Beats. All Nass lacking everything else. How can a brand new product sound worse than a product made by someone else and it cicts less.

You can get brand new Buds Pro for around $100 and they sound far better than anything Applle makes.


All reviews say the kbly thing Apple products are good at is the noise canceling and transparency modes. But you buy them for sound. What good is all that if they still sound like crap. The only single benefit to the AirPods is if you have an iPhone.


Samsing made their own 100MP camera. That's innovative. Apple doesn't make any cameras. They still buy Sony sensors.


The only thing about can brag about is their SoC. But if it was so powerful, then why do iPhone even now have a lower resolution screen vs my 4 year old Android?


Samsung has to be innovative by default because they design and manufacture their own products. Apple doesn't do any of that.


You know Samsung built the Burj Kalifa. It's has far more innovations than Apple's flightless saucer and it cost less money to build.


Let that sink in. The Burj Khalifa is more innovative and more advanced in other things other than its height, and it costed less money to build vs Apple's flightless saucer.

So? They didn’t design it, they just got the contract to build it, and they did it using slave labor. Now write your previous reply in Spanish. Here’s a tip-don’t rely solely on Google Translate to do it, because often that service makes grammatical errors.

Like
Quote
• 2mo ago
↵iphoneisboss said:

So? They didn’t design it, they just got the contract to build it, and they did it using slave labor. Now write your previous reply in Spanish. Here’s a tip-don’t rely solely on Google Translate to do it, because often that service makes grammatical errors.

Where tf did you hear they used slave labor? Also they might not have made the first design but they definitely improved it. Honestly the moto razr is the best value flip phone. They're like 500$.

Like
Quote
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless