x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) vs Samsung Galaxy S7

Pages

Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) vs Samsung Galaxy S7

Introduction


Samsung’s Galaxy S7 is one of the most popular Android phones. In part, that's because of its very good performance and excellent camera. Another key factor is the stunning glass and metal design.

Well, when it comes to the design and looks, Samsung has just made a near carbon copy that is way more affordable: the new Galaxy A5 (2017). Really, the Galaxy S7 and Galaxy A5 (2017) are strikingly similar. Both feature a curved glass back and a metal frame, both are of identical physical size, even both are water-resistant and run on the same Grace user interface.

So why even consider the Galaxy S7 then? Well, do not write off the flagship S7 just yet: we will be comparing the new S7 and A5 (2017) in areas that are not immediately obvious, such as the actual performance, camera quality, battery life and so on. So let’s see.

Design

Look at the two from afar, and you won’t be able to tell the difference.

As we said already, the S7 and A5 (2017) are really similar. So much so that from afar, you could easily mistake one for the other. The giveaway is the camera. While the S7 has a large camera sensor with optical image stabilization that protrudes out of the phone’s back, the A5 (2017) has a tiny camera lens that almost looks disproportionately small.

The phones' physical size is comparable: the A5 is just a hair wider and taller, but the difference is almost invisible. Both are also equally thin: just 7.9mm, but the curved glass on the back makes it feel like they are even smaller. Having curved glass backs also adds to the comfort factor: it’s easier to pick them up from the table.

Both have a fingerprint scanner up front, embedded in the physical home button, and both have a 3.5mm headset jack.

Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) vs Samsung Galaxy S7
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) vs Samsung Galaxy S7
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) vs Samsung Galaxy S7
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) vs Samsung Galaxy S7
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) vs Samsung Galaxy S7

The coolest feature that the two share, however, has to be water resistance: both can be submerged in water up to 5 feet deep for as long as 30 minutes without suffering any damage. They are not meant to live under water (and do not bring them close to salty sea / ocean water), but an occasional selfie in the swimming pool is fine, and you don’t need to worry when using them in the rain or dropping them in the toilet. It’s really nice that Samsung equips even a mid-range phone like the A5 (2017) with water-proofing at the high IP 68 rating, while even Apple’s flagship darling, the iPhone 7, has a lower IP 67 water protection (meaning it can be safely submerged in only 3-feet deep water).

The new A5 also has one advantage over the Galaxy S7: it uses the newer USB-C port for charging, while the S7 relies on the dated microUSB. USB-C is reversible, so you can plug in USB-C cables both ways, and it’s gradually becoming the universal standard for all sorts of electronics. It’s simply more future-proof.

Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches
146.1 x 71.4 x 7.9 mm
5.96 oz (169 g)

Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)

Samsung Galaxy S7
5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches
142.4 x 69.6 x 7.9 mm
5.36 oz (152 g)

Samsung Galaxy S7


To see the phones in real size or compare them with other models, visit our Visual Phone Size Comparison page.

Display


Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) vs Samsung Galaxy S7

Switching over to the display part, we have two AMOLED screens with gorgeous colors. The S7 features a 5.1” screen with a higher, 1440 x 2560 pixel (Quad HD) resolution, while the A5 (2017) has a 5.2” display with a 1080 x 1920 pixel resolution. Both are PenTile displays (meaning they get less sub-pixels per pixels than an LCD RGB screen), and while there is a slight difference in sharpness, when using the phones at a regular viewing distance they both looked sharp enough to us.

Both phones support various color modes, as is typical with Samsung screens, and we recommend using the Basic screen mode (go to Settings > Display > Screen Modes to switch). The default Adaptive mode looks equally punchy and oversaturated on both, but is not particularly accurate to calibration standards. You can check out our detailed color measurements right below and notice that the S7 has a slight advantage with its better color balance.

The other cool thing about the A5 (2017) is that it gets the Always-on Display mode that the flagship S7 has. It shows high-contrast white text on your lockscreen all the time and is useful to see the time, date and whether you have some missed notifications (the text of notifications, however, is not shown). This is a cool feature, but having it enabled will have an impact on battery life.

Display measurements and quality

Maximum brightness (nits)Higher is better Minimum brightness (nits)Lower is better Contrast Higher is better Color temperature (Kelvins) Gamma Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better Delta E grayscale Lower is better
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) 556
(Excellent)
1.8
(Excellent)
unmeasurable
(Excellent)
6725
(Excellent)
2.02
2.37
(Good)
7.25
(Average)
Samsung Galaxy S7 484
(Good)
2
(Excellent)
unmeasurable
(Excellent)
6852
(Excellent)
2.07
1.26
(Excellent)
2.09
(Good)
View all

10 Comments
  • Options
    Close





posted on 20 Feb 2017, 09:56

1. kiko007 (Posts: 4972; Member since: 17 Feb 2016)


I actually really want an A5 (2017) because of the battery life, but can't find it in any American outlets (I don't trust importing anymore....). It's just so nice looking too!

posted on 20 Feb 2017, 12:27

2. Subie (Posts: 1298; Member since: 01 Aug 2015)


I'm not sure why Sammy doesn't offer it from their own website. They have the S line, Notes and the J line available. As well as some older models, but not the A's...

posted on 20 Feb 2017, 13:03

3. Clars123 (Posts: 916; Member since: 16 Mar 2015)


considering the A line literally just kicked off its sales here in the UK I'd say wait a while.

posted on 20 Feb 2017, 13:12

4. maherk (Posts: 4614; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


You can find it on Amazon.
The A series is a great option for midrangers, but I would advise you to stay away from them. They are fine for the average costumer, but for me, you, and anyone who knows a bit or two about specs and what other OEMs are offering, I would pick something else that has a better camera, because their midrangers, while on paper they pack good sensors, their finak results are awful. I picked an A8 2016 for my father in law 2 weeks ago, and while he loved it, I found it baffling that it is missing loads of features that you will find on other similarly priced phones. No notification led, no hiptic feedback, no OIS are a few that I can start with.

For the price it is sold for in the US, I would consider getting the Honor 8, or even the 6P.

posted on 20 Feb 2017, 13:39

5. Subie (Posts: 1298; Member since: 01 Aug 2015)


You're right about Amazon. Those are international versions though and won't work on Verizon or Sprint in the US. A lot of times those models don't come with a proper warranty either. Same goes for Ebay purchases too. So in that regard your suggestion of a different phone all together makes more sense.

posted on 20 Feb 2017, 14:02

6. kiko007 (Posts: 4972; Member since: 17 Feb 2016)


That's true, but I'm not really in search of any flagship qualities. I just want a nice backup phone I can tinker with. And since this already has a working TWRP and CMW on XDA, and I know it's at least got great battery life, I thought I'd take a dip. Can't remember the last time I had a midrange Sammy....has to be like 6 years or something like that. Plus, I mean c'mon, it's f-ing gorgeous!

posted on 20 Feb 2017, 20:02

8. WPX00 (Posts: 443; Member since: 15 Aug 2015)


The 2015 nor 2016 series ever made their way to American shores. It is particularly confounding to me: Samsung lacks a real midrange option in America, where the J7 is the highest end model before it jumps to the S series, S6 I believe.

posted on 06 Mar 2017, 20:18

10. thlai (Posts: 5; Member since: 06 Mar 2017)


But apart from nice looking, the performance sucks. This A5 (2017) is basically performing at Galaxy Alpha level, which was launched in August 2014. This was the 1st phone with the powerful Exynos quadcore. This phone was so good that Samsung decided to retire it early as it was cannibalizing Galaxy S5 market.

posted on 20 Feb 2017, 17:40

7. rj.gabrillo (Posts: 10; Member since: 13 Jun 2013)


Im a new user of A5 2017 from the Philippines.
I just lost my 2weeks old S7edge last Feb13.

I loved the UI of this phone, it looks like my Note7 before.

posted on 24 Feb 2017, 21:15

9. Instrumentfa (Posts: 1; Member since: 24 Feb 2017)


还可以,17款A5和S7长得差不多

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories