x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S

Posted: , by Daniel P.

Tags:

Pages
Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S
Introduction:

If a Clash of the Titans movie was to be made for the smartphone industry, it would certainly feature the Nokia N8 and the Samsung Galaxy S. These are the current cream-of-the-crop handsets of the world's largest and second-largest cell phone manufacturers. The Nokia N8 and Samsung Galaxy S might be the high road for both companies, but the purposes behind them are different.

The Nokia N8 is a flagship phone with premium feel, and still, with Symbian^3, it feels like the pinnacle of Nokia that were, a peak hardware effort, before the Finnish company morphs into something yet unknown. Nokia wanted to make the highest end device to run a tried and true mobile OS that millions of users are accustomed to for years. In that respect, it is an evolutionary phone, despite some best-in-class features.

The Samsung Galaxy S, on the other hand, represents the top effort of a novel path that Samsung undertook with Android, having the fastest graphics chipset in a phone, and an enormous  4”  Super AMOLED screen. Nokia N8 is like the brilliant film of a beloved movie star at the zenith of their hectic carrier, while the Galaxy S is the straight-As grad student, ready to change the world.


Design:

The Nokia N8 and the Samsung Galaxy S are both touchscreen-only devices, and that is where the design similarities end. Nokia N8 is beautifully crafted from a single sheet of anodized aluminum, and exudes that premium feel, aided by the solid heft of the metal body. It is enough to run your nail along the back, or rub your thumb against the etched logo, in order to conclude that this is a high-end craftsmanship.

The Nokia N8 and the Samsung Galaxy S are both touchscreen-only devices - Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S
The Nokia N8 and the Samsung Galaxy S are both touchscreen-only devices - Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S
The Nokia N8 and the Samsung Galaxy S are both touchscreen-only devices - Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S

The Nokia N8 and the Samsung Galaxy S are both touchscreen-only devices



The Samsung Galaxy S also wows you, but from a different perspective. It is extremely thin at just 0.39 inches (9.9 mm), compared to the Nokia N8's 0.51 inches (12.9 mm). It is also very light in the hand, and thus doesn't feel like the big phone it actually is. Being made entirely of plastic has its positives - plastic is lighter and less rigid thаn metal, and this might actually help the precious Super AMOLED screen survive drops and other rough handling.

Nokia N8 (left and above) and Samsung Galaxy S (right and below) - Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S
Nokia N8 (left and above) and Samsung Galaxy S (right and below) - Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S

Nokia N8 (left and above) and Samsung Galaxy S (right and below)


The Galaxy S experience centers around that 4” 480x800 pixels Super AMOLED display, and the 3.5” regular AMOLED with 360x640 pixels  can't hold water against the Super AMOLED Goliath. Thanks to the Super AMOLED tech, the Galaxy S delivers incredibly high-contrast ratio and great viewing angles. For the most part, the ordinary AMOLED screen on the Nokia N8 manages to replicate this experience, but things get quite different when taken outside, under direct sunlight. The regular AMOLED has a relatively high reflectance ratio, while the Super AMOLED's is only 4%, one of the lowest in a smartphone. Still, Nokia has done a great job coating the N8, and the display is decent outside, but the Galaxy S fares even better, on par with the best LCD screens out there.

From left to right - Apple iPhone 4, Samsung Galaxy S, Nokia N8 - Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S
From left to right - Apple iPhone 4, Samsung Galaxy S, Nokia N8 - Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S
From left to right - Apple iPhone 4, Samsung Galaxy S, Nokia N8 - Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S

From left to right - Apple iPhone 4, Samsung Galaxy S, Nokia N8



Both handsets have physical home buttons under their screens. The Samsung Galaxy S, though, also adds capacitive back and menu Android buttons on its sides. Android’s hardware back and menu keys are frankly a better idea, since the virtual Options and Back in Symbian just take screen real estate.

Looking around the handsets, we find not less than ten openings and buttons on the sides of the Nokia N8, compared to the four in the Samsung Galaxy S, indicative of the difference in the design approach.

Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S
Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S
Nokia N8 - above, Samsung Galaxy S - below - Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S
Nokia N8 - above, Samsung Galaxy S - below - Nokia N8 vs Samsung Galaxy S

Nokia N8 - above, Samsung Galaxy S - below


One notable difference is that the Nokia N8 has a non-removable battery. The card slots (SIM and microSD), are taken out of the battery compartment, and placed on the left side, while Galaxy S has them inside. On the right side the Nokia N8 has the camera button, while the Galaxy S uses the touchscreen to focus and shoot.

The buttons on both handsets are very responsive, with enough travel. The important ports are protected either by sliding lids or by plastic caps, and, all in all, despite the difference in materials, both the Nokia N8 and the Samsung Galaxy S are manufactured with precision, and feel like they can go for years of faithful service.



Nokia N8 360 Degrees View:


Samsung Galaxy S 360 Degrees View:


75 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:55 1

1. E (unregistered)


Galaxy S is the winner. No question!

posted on 19 Oct 2010, 12:37 4

33. rafael.roque (Posts: 78; Member since: 03 Jul 2010)


I disagree... Yes question!

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 11:12 2

2. me (unregistered)


I prefer Nokia N8. Seen on the image difference in dark and videos amazing voice and solid aluminium cover - all of these things are on the side of N8

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 11:15 1

3. cristianer (Posts: 42; Member since: 20 Aug 2010)


That's nice but before that I prefer Android and not Symbian

posted on 21 Oct 2010, 07:15 1

42. Phonepro (unregistered)


Symbian is very flexible but not for the User that wants to have the easiest interface. But if you are used to the Symbian System it's not worse than the Iphone or the Android System. In fact the possibilities Symbian offers to the more experienced user are more advanced, It's just not the OS for someone who is into the Design but more the OS for the ones that need a compact fast and open System and for those who are willing to invest some time in customizing it to ones need. If you are the secound one Symbian is best for you - if you are more into the Out-Of-The-Box-But-Less-Personal type - Get the Android - Or The Iphone.

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 11:28 1

4. samking21 (Posts: 4; Member since: 24 Jun 2010)


In my opinion, Samsung is the best because it combines many powerful things inside, such as processor speed and screen size and color screen technology and the operating system and a stronger battery, for the strength of Nokia camera and read the media and external storage )) Samsung wins ((

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 11:38 1

5. Pio (unregistered)


Weird comparison... Ufcourse Android for me is a winner.

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 12:00 1

6. Dan the Man (unregistered)


I own both phones, here is my verdict (OS-aside), let's assign 1 point for each round: Build Quality: N8 with its aluminum build and scratch-resistant gorilla glass display Display: Galaxy S with its larger 4" SAMOLED technology Connectivity: N8 which aces the competition with HDMI out and USB Host functionality Call Quality: N8 with more natural-sounding conversation, noise-cancellation Imaging: N8 with 12MP camera, Xenon-flash Video capture: Draw - both phones take gorgeous videos Durability: N8 due to its metallic build and scratch-resistant display. My Galaxy S got its first scratch on the 2nd day (rubber case is a must) SIM and Memory card handling: N8 due to easy access on the side without having to remove battery In-box package contents: N8 - in addition to the charger and, comes with mini HDMI adapter, USB-on-the go adapter, better quality in-ear earphones Battery Life: N8 charges every 2 days Apps pre-installed: N8 Apps downloadable: Galaxy S Price (unlocked): Nokia N8 US$ 530.00, Galaxy S US$ 700.00 Total Tally: Nokia - 10 points, Galaxy S - 2 points If you include Anroid OS as an advantage, Tally: Nokia - 10 points, Galaxy S - 3 points

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 12:23 2

9. Franco (unregistered)


Yeap, but should end 10 to N8 and 4 to Galaxy S, you forgot to mention ergonomics and fluid interface.

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 12:23 1

10. Franco (unregistered)


Also forgot: Email, Galaxy S is a lot better: so: 10 to n8 , 5 to Galaxy S.

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 17:14 1

15. DontHateOnS60 (Posts: 867; Member since: 20 Apr 2009)


N8 has multitouch in its email client. I don't remember my Captivate having that.

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 17:18 2

16. DontHateOnS60 (Posts: 867; Member since: 20 Apr 2009)


Ability to control your data connection: N8 UI: Galaxy S Loudspeaker: N8 GPS: N8 Navigation: N8 because you can preload all map data onto your phone. Signal reception: N8 by a landslide.

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 17:25 1

17. Dan the Man (unregistered)


@ Franco: that's why I said "OS-aside" from the beginning to offset the UI of the phones but I get your point. Ergonomics has two fronts: software interface and device-handling. Samsung "probably" wins on the software front but the N8 wins on the device-handling front: works both on single and dual-handed use, ease of access to SIM, memory card, doesn't slip off your hand that easily. :)

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 17:27

18. Dan the Man (unregistered)


@DontHateOnS60: Points well raised. I agree. :)

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 17:55 1

19. jedrek (Posts: 1; Member since: 18 Oct 2010)


In my view, a better OS worths not only "1 point", so as some of your list take no "1 point" advantage. I chose the Android one. But one thing I have to admit that --- i9k's GPS sucks!

posted on 19 Oct 2010, 00:27 1

22. Sayantan Nandi (unregistered)


everyone has a different needs for buying a phone.....u cant really pick a winner.....if u consider a few more points 1.galaxy S can upload to twitter fb flickr youtube etc directly from the gallery app...n8 cant 2.widgets on galaxy S are better...u have only fixed size widgets on the n8 3.galaxy S doesnt show checker boxes while zooming in and out the web browser....n8 does it even for simple pages 4.u take 4 steps to enter a web address on n8.....galaxy S does with voice commands(FroYo) or 1 step(Eclair/Donut/Cupcake) 5.u cant type on QWERTY in portait mode on n8....galaxy S supports t9,handwriting as well as QWERTY 6.galaxy S is DivX HD certified,Dolby certified,SRS certified...sure n8 plays DivX HD..but not certified yet :P 7.Its GPU can display 90million triangles/sec.......n8 wont do even 20million/sec...iphone 4 and other 1Ghz snapragon processor based phones do 28million/sec 8.galaxy S comes with free Office Editing app....n8 lacks it so i gave 8 points where galaxy S wins......can give many more.....so better lets not choose a winner and let the buyers decide their needs to buy the phone and those creating a fuss with GPS on galaxy S...it got fixed with FroYo update....it locks perfectly now :)... i donno about Galaxy S captivate...but i9000 has a multitouch client for email

posted on 19 Oct 2010, 05:50 1

26. anuragdahiya (Posts: 1; Member since: 19 Oct 2010)


i agree

posted on 19 Oct 2010, 11:07

29. Stoli89 (Posts: 333; Member since: 28 Jun 2010)


6. I find it hard to believe you're suggesting the Galaxy S comes with more CODEC support than the N8. Try again. 7. Actually, the N8's Broadcom GPU does 32 millions triangles/sec; more than the iPhone 4's GPU within its A4 SOC. Both are trumped by the Galaxy S' Hummingbird. ----Browser----The N8 browser will be replaced with a new Qt based browser. In my opinion, for the next 6 weeks...use Opera 10 Mobile; in any event, it's faster than any of the stock browser's for Android or IOS. ---Qwerty Portrait----The current firmware will be upgraded soon to support. Once done, SWYPE will then be able to include its own Portrait solution. ----OS versus UI---- There are a lot of features integrated within the Symbian OS that rivals fail to offer. Its the only OS designed from the ground up for embedded devices and its ability to operate with limited resources are unparalleled. However, the User Interface in not on par with IOS nor Android 2.1/2.2. It's OK for Symbian users, but it is not a draw for converts. Hopefully, both Meego and the Symbian^4 UI's will move the bar ahead and not only attempt catch-up. Bottom line...there's a difference between comparing and entire OS versus comparing the UI stack. ---30 fps---seems this has already been easily cracked on the N8. One can assume, from the reviews and feeback, that an offical firmware update would bring the 30fps into the mainstream. ...as for equivalent build quality...comparing a phone with a plastic body to one made from a single piece of anodized aluminum is a bit of a stretch, IMHO.

posted on 19 Oct 2010, 12:29

32. jd829 (Posts: 155; Member since: 24 Feb 2010)


Try some ginko biloba to help your memory, my captivate supports multi-touch in email.

posted on 19 Oct 2010, 15:18

34. rafael.roque (Posts: 78; Member since: 03 Jul 2010)


FYI the N8's Broadcom GPU can produce 30M triangles/second. Which is on part with the iphone4 and

posted on 19 Oct 2010, 21:39

37. thatdude1 (unregistered)


Download Nokia messaging service-much better than Android stock experience.

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 12:03

7. jpropin (Posts: 152; Member since: 20 May 2010)


'll take the Nokia. It's better built, will last longer and in the end be a better value. Nokia supports their devices long after they have been released. Samsung's support of it's products is poor. And thats being generous. Having Android for me does'nt make up for the fact that it's still a Samsung. And that's not good. I got burned with the Behold II and as The Who said....."Won't Get Fooled Again"

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 12:24

11. Franco (unregistered)


Nokia hardware build is the best ever... but I got the poor Sansung due Android marketplace.. a lot more softwares.

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 12:37

12. jpropin (Posts: 152; Member since: 20 May 2010)


If I need 400 different versions of apps that have different names but all do the same thing, then I'll worry about the marketplace. I don't need 40 apps to tell me how to tie a necktie, and one tic-tac-toe game is enough for me. Don't need 25 of those. I want a phone that will last and won't crumble when it hits a floor made of rubber. A phone I can squeeze tightly in my hand and think, "man, this is solid" A phone that is not all foam and no beer and does'nt write checks it can't cash. In other words a device that can simply do what it says it can do in reality and not on a spec-sheet.

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 16:29

13. bucky (Posts: 2686; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)


both phones are shite. Samsung and Nokia forget about their phones quickly. both are buggy too. If you absolutey MUST have a nokia get an n900. Otherwise stay clear of both these phones.

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 16:43

14. chrtran (unregistered)


so true. i have the nokia 5800 NAM (from like 2008) and its still supported by nokia, just got another software update lastweek (v50, north america is behind euro updates)

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 23:32

21. haha (unregistered)


nokias service is bullcrap atleast out here in India.. Samsung out here can get ur phone fixed in a few minutes.. which is why i left nokia after having a number of phones with major issues.. as for firmware updates.. nokias updates basically fixed the bugs that should have not been there in the first place..(with no major improvements.. i still own an n82 which has gone nowhere from where it was when i bought it) which means in the case of nokia if yu want the next version of symbian.. buy the new phone...or be stuck with the same firmware for life!. btw my galaxy does not have the gps issue.. the gps issue is present only for those phones that are locked to the operators cos of the additional firmware that is shuffed into the phone by them(operators)

posted on 19 Oct 2010, 11:15

30. Stoli89 (Posts: 333; Member since: 28 Jun 2010)


I updated my back-up 5800XM with PNHT's port of C6-00 custom firmware for the 5800. Homescreen widgets, full kinetics, a faster boot, more free RAM, and very conservative use of c drive. The UI is also faster/smoother. The CFW is based on C6's second firmware update (11.0.029) and it blows the standard 5800XM (51.0.006) out of the water. Coupled with an OtterBox Commuter case which makes the phone feel better in the hand...this old 5800XM is still a reliable and very capable little phone.

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 12:14

8. perfect boy (unregistered)


just love moto milestone series

posted on 18 Oct 2010, 18:46

20. cristianer (Posts: 42; Member since: 20 Aug 2010)


Yeah. I'm waiting the milestone 2 in argentina

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories