Samsung's foundry allegedly asked Apple to pay 20% more for each processor it supplies
1. g2a5b0e (Posts: 1391; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
As well they should. Turnabout is fair play as they say.
10. PhenomFaz (Posts: 1042; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)
Only 20% more! Huh they should've asked much more from a hog like Apple!
14. anywherehome (Posts: 971; Member since: 13 Dec 2011)
The A6 processor goes for $28
so (28*1,2-28)*200000000 pieces this year = 1,1 bln!! = the US verdict
great job Samsung!! :-D
2. twens (Posts: 336; Member since: 25 Feb 2012)
Apple should be glad its only 20% more.afterall their products are over priced and will compensate for that 20%.
3. MeoCao (unregistered)
Great move, SS needs the money to pay for litigation caused by Apple.
5. Hemlocke (unregistered)
Yes, how dare Apple make the iPhone before Samsung had thought to make a device like it, which is compounded by Apple then forcing Samsung to copy it in totality. The nerve of Cupertino doing all of those things to a tiny Korean company who is innocent and worthy of our compassion.
11. VZWuser76 (Posts: 726; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)
Copying "in totality" would mean that Samsung took an iphone, and replaced the apple logos with their own. Do they look similar, yes. Are they identical, no. There are literally thousands of different products that are as similar as the Galaxy S is to the iphone. TVs, washers, dryers, dishwashers, microwaves, refrigerators, dvd players, bluray players, vcrs, desktop PCs, laptops, home stereo equipment, car stereo equipment, personal audio players, cordless phones, etc. But for some reason, the only industries with ongoing lawsuits are the ones Apple is involved in.
This attitude of Apple created everything and no one else did is getting old. You've got to admit, most of the stuff that apple has patented, while convenient, is not necessary for the phone to be a phone or to connect to the net. But with those technologies, Apple simply uses them until taken to court over them. Everyone here will bring up that the android oems can't sue over FRAND patents. But they can require payment for using said patents, and Apple tries to use their position to pay a lower price than anyone else does, which would actually violate FRAND. And if they have to take them to court to get it then they should. It's no different than a landlord taking a tenant to court to not paying their rent.
6. cheetah2k (Posts: 696; Member since: 16 Jan 2011)
The only problem is that Samsung needs to sell 47,619,047 AX processors to meet that $1Bn court ruling... :(
8. MeoCao (unregistered)
The judge is reviewing the case and there is clear evidence of breach of duty by the jury.
I guess Apple will end up paying SS legal fees.
How about another apology?
4. _Bone_ (Posts: 1753; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
Funny how the bully thinks he can push Samsung around when he depends on that company. In the meantime the bullied kid is quietly turning the world around Apple, and before you know, it's a damn bad place the be a bully! :)
7. Danre (Posts: 85; Member since: 02 Sep 2012)
Samsung ask more money.
Apple fan have too much money and they don't know how to spend it.
May be you can help them.
9. Topcat488 (Posts: 790; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
Apple will simply pass on the 20% cost to their customers, so it won't effect them at all.
12. downphoenix (Posts: 1994; Member since: 19 Jun 2010)
Cost of processor goes up 20%, refelcting an icnrease of cost for them about 4-5$. Apple increases cost of their product, like an Ipad, by 20%, cost to consumer goes up 100$. Seems legit.
13. nofear (Posts: 146; Member since: 22 Jun 2012)
Yep, iFan will be pay for it because they're brain wash so much and not knowing or knob enough not feeling the pain.