(Posts: 114; Member since: 28 Mar 2011)
Are they really relying on clear? I mean these are the same idiots that didn't have major markets like Detroit metro, Phoenix and Indianapolis on their list for official roll outs. Not to mention they are out of money and have no plans to add any new markets in 2011. Bad idea in my opinion.
(Posts: 102; Member since: 02 May 2010)
Good idea, BUT...If their devices are the same as Sprint's, I do not see them doing much business. I have clear for home only because the mobile hotspot was not able to pick up a signal compared to the stronger home device. It would be nice if they continue their subsidizing with soon to come tablets! I would love to get a galaxy tab 10.1 for $300 or less. I would definitely buy their service that way.
I live in nyc and i was using clear's 4g spot, and in every building i went into i lost service.
clear wimax 4g really sucks. if your one of does person who is always outside all the time it will be a good internet provider for you, since thats the only place you will receive service, outside of a building.
(Posts: 48; Member since: 19 Dec 2010)
ok it says it will rely on sprints network, isnt that suppost to mean its gonna be way better than clearwires service? or does clearwire own all wimax towers?
yes, clearwire own all wimax towers
you should google
clear 4g sucks