x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • “At least one” upcoming 2013 Android phone will have fingerprint sensor like iPhone 5S

“At least one” upcoming 2013 Android phone will have fingerprint sensor like iPhone 5S

Posted: , by Victor H.

Tags :

“At least one” upcoming 2013 Android phone will have fingerprint sensor like iPhone 5S
The Apple iPhone 5S is not even out yet, but all rumors agree on one thing - it will come with a fingerprint reader built right into the home key, a feature that aims to bring improved security and can have huge reverberations for mobile payments. This could truly become the iPhone 5S’ big stand-out feature, but now the Wall Street Journal confirms that “at least one” Android phone will come with a similar fingerprint sensor baked right in.

The publication known for having sources close to Apple and Google quotes a “person familiar with the matter” saying that Apple’s decision to put in a fingerprint sensor will influence other companies to follow suit. Moreover, this mysterious new Android smartphone is expected to arrive this year. However it is not yet clear whether that smartphone will be coming to the United States in particular.

Now, fingerprint sensor in devices are nothing new. We’ve been seeing them appear on business oriented notebook computers for years, and we’ve also seen them on smartphones like the Motorola Atrix 4G, a phone released way back in 2011. The problem with the Atrix and its fingerprint reader was that it just wasn’t any good - it did not always work properly and it wasn’t meant to last long years.

Now, we expect much better from Apple. Cupertino acquired renown fingerprint reader maker Authentec last year, and is said to have included the sensor into a sapphire made home key. This should make it durable and long lasting.

All this comes amidst talk about passwords being an imperfect way to protect mobile devices that could easily be lost or stolen, and sensitive data compromised.

source: Wall Street Journal

60 Comments
  • Options
    Close





posted on 10 Sep 2013, 09:29 9

1. zuckerboy (banned) (Posts: 898; Member since: 22 Dec 2011)


maybe nexus 5

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 10:39 10

25. rf1975 (Posts: 259; Member since: 01 Aug 2011)


I think it will come from most innovative company shamesung.
See their another innovation
http://www.engadget.com/2013/09/10/dyson-sues-samsung-vacuum-design-rip-off/

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 10:59 1

34. zuckerboy (banned) (Posts: 898; Member since: 22 Dec 2011)


doesnt matter for me

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 11:53 4

45. tedkord (Posts: 13259; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


So Apple copying it from Motorola was innovation?

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 09:36 10

2. Commentator (Posts: 3721; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)


I thought the One Max was supposed to have a big ugly square one on the back?

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 09:37 14

3. RoyalPayne (banned) (Posts: 458; Member since: 07 Aug 2013)


And it'll be Samsung! The biggest i$heep!
They copy everything else, don't they?
http://www.engadget.com/2013/09/10/dyson-sues-samsung-vacuum-design-rip-off/

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 09:47 17

5. suavemezie (Posts: 86; Member since: 21 Jun 2012)


When Apple copy its nota crime right? Atrix has it for almost 2 years now. so who's copying who?

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 09:54 9

7. RoyalPayne (banned) (Posts: 458; Member since: 07 Aug 2013)


Porsche Design P’9522 had it before the Atrix, why didn't you mention that?

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 09:59 7

11. Nephylim (Posts: 134; Member since: 04 Apr 2013)


If apple copy.... you call it inovation, don't you?

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 10:07 4

13. RoyalPayne (banned) (Posts: 458; Member since: 07 Aug 2013)


Nope! Do you?

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 10:12 2

16. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)


Exactly my point.

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 10:24 6

19. Just.Saying (Posts: 132; Member since: 04 Apr 2013)


APPLE doesn't make the iPhone itself. It neither manufactures the components nor assembles them into a finished product. The components come from a variety of suppliers and the assembly is done by Foxconn, Samsung is a particularly important supplier. It provides some of the phone's most important components: the flash memory that holds the phone's apps, music and operating software; the working memory, or DRAM; and the applications processor that makes the whole thing work...
Bash Samsung all you want but just remember, By Supporting apple you are supporting SAMSUNG. Deal with It

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 10:33 4

21. RoyalPayne (banned) (Posts: 458; Member since: 07 Aug 2013)


Your point? From which part of irrelevance did u snoop in?

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 10:34

22. RoyalPayne (banned) (Posts: 458; Member since: 07 Aug 2013)


*dealing*

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 10:46 3

28. illusionmist (Posts: 157; Member since: 29 Jan 2013)


Just because they both read your fingerprint doesn\'t mean they\'re the same technology.

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 10:54

31. RoyalPayne (banned) (Posts: 458; Member since: 07 Aug 2013)


They won't get it!

posted on 17 Sep 2013, 01:46

58. CRizzy (Posts: 2; Member since: 17 Sep 2013)


Yes and no. Although the Atrix was one of the newer phones to have a Finger Print scanner, it was a completely different concept than Apple. Atrix had a scanner that could be hacked because it only took a black and white image of the finger. The Apple sensor is much more advance using newer technology.

posted on 21 Sep 2013, 22:05

59. NotADroid (Posts: 1; Member since: 21 Sep 2013)


oh yeah and you really hear of the buzz about that phone now.

Cutting edge. Groundbreaking technology. It was February 2011 and Motorola just launched a new phone with a slick, new feature: a built-in fingerprint sensor.

It was the Motorola Atrix 4G. Chances are, you've never heard of the phone.

Why not? While we could come up to a number of answers to that question, there's one simple answer that sums it up. Motorola isn't Apple. It takes a powerful brand and an Apple-like customer experience to get customers to notice new technologies like this.

Motorola would have done well to take some advice from Steve Jobs: "You've got to start with the customer experience and work back toward the technology -- not the other way around."

The Motorola's Atrix 4G sensor was built on the back side of the phone, near the top. Talk about awkward.

They probably didn't have the technology or the hardware real estate to embed it on the font anywhere. So what did they do? They put it on the only place they could put it. They did what Apple would never do.

Touch ID on iPhone 5s.
On the iPhone 5s, the feature is built right into the home button -- the same button that already prompts the phone to display the unlock screen.

Given the Touch ID's seamless experience, Apple can actually use the feature as a major selling point.

The Atix -- what was it called? Oh yeah, the Atrix 4G -- the Atrix failed miserably to pass Jobs' customer-experience test. This feature will be around and working on iphones for years to come.
it. IF it was such good technology why isnt it on all androids now? it took a stupid black and white picture of your fingerprint and it could be unlocked with a picture of your print. same with the "face recognition" technology which could also be unlocked with a picture

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 09:43 1

4. RebelwithoutaClue (Posts: 3351; Member since: 05 Apr 2013)


I doubt fingerprint sensor will be any more secure than a code. Want to steal someone's iphone? Just knock them out and put their finger on the button. And it better work all the time, even when it's 95% correct, it will annoy the crap out of people.

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 09:55 6

8. RoyalPayne (banned) (Posts: 458; Member since: 07 Aug 2013)


Yes coz knockin ppl out is as easy as stealing their phone!

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 10:55 6

32. good2great (Posts: 1042; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)


this comment was so appropriate with your profile pic...lol

+1

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 11:14 5

36. frydaexiii (Posts: 1471; Member since: 01 Dec 2011)


Obviously, you haven't been to Malaysia...

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 11:44

40. RebelwithoutaClue (Posts: 3351; Member since: 05 Apr 2013)


Yes it is quite easy, especially when choosing your targets right.

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 22:53 2

55. Xenaz (Posts: 144; Member since: 28 Apr 2013)


Yeah, nowadays, Malaysia criminals doesn\\\\\\\'t knock ppl out but stab ppl with knife or even placing a bullet on ppl body....

Thanks to our briliant government.

posted on 11 Sep 2013, 05:15

57. vincelongman (Posts: 4957; Member since: 10 Feb 2013)


I feel really sorry for you guys.
I heard about your elections, I hope someone restores democracy in Malaysia soon.

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 09:49 2

6. brrunopt (Posts: 742; Member since: 15 Aug 2013)


just stop it... start bringing real innovation and not re-utilized scrap

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 09:55 5

9. rawbow (Posts: 428; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)


the word innovation has a meaning, research it and stop using it like a droid potato!

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 09:58 3

10. Sauce (unregistered)


Starting bringing real commentation and not re-commentated crap.

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 10:02 1

12. pwnarena (Posts: 1129; Member since: 15 Feb 2013)


if we believe movies, it\'s also very easy to copy fingerprints. it does not really provide the best security.

posted on 10 Sep 2013, 10:10

14. RoyalPayne (banned) (Posts: 458; Member since: 07 Aug 2013)


So Apple should provide you with bodyguards now? Fingerprint sensor is still better than making patterns on dots.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories