Sony Xperia J priced around $300 in the U.K.

Sony Xperia J priced around $300 in the U.K.
Out of the bunch of Androids that Sony announced last week, the Xperia J is undoubtedly the most humble one. It sports a 4-inch screen with a resolution of 480 by 854 pixels, there is a 5-megapixel camera on its back, and the show is being run by a 1GHz Snapdragon processor.

However, for those of you who are fine with specs like these, U.K. retailer Clove now has a price tag on the Sony Xperia J. It is currently hovering around the $300 mark (190GBP) including tax and excluding carrier subsidy of any kind. The high-end Sony Xperia T and the mid-range Sony Xperia V are listed in the retailer's database as well, but have not been priced yet.

But don't take out your credit cards yet as the Sony Xperia J is not in stock and it won't be until later in October. Is anyone willing to wait until then anyway and grab themselves one? Drop a comment below and let us know!

source: Clove via Android Central

Related phones

Xperia J
  • Display 4.0" 480 x 854 pixels
  • Camera 5 MP / 0.3 MP VGA front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon S1, Single core, 1000 MHz
  • Storage 4 GB + microSDHC
  • Battery 1750 mAh(7.3h 3G talk time)



1. spiderpig2894

Posts: 597; Member since: Jan 10, 2012

hmm, I can't say that the Xperia V can be classified as "mid-ranged"

2. smallworld

Posts: 517; Member since: Jul 13, 2012

Stop calling the V a midrange phone. It's clearly an high-end phone.

3. buccob

Posts: 2963; Member since: Jun 19, 2012

I agree, the Xperia V is most definitely a high end phone with some awesome certification...

4. techspace

Posts: 1037; Member since: Sep 03, 2012

why PA doesn't have a mobile version? i came here on my phone to see how PA works on mobile.......and i think that we need a mobile version now

5. smallworld

Posts: 517; Member since: Jul 13, 2012

That would be great, the mobile version of gsmarena is awesome.

6. techspace

Posts: 1037; Member since: Sep 03, 2012

exactly...........GA's mobile mobile version is very comfortable for the smaller screens, the mobile version is also very fast and i think PA also needs something like that

7. rusticguy

Posts: 2828; Member since: Aug 11, 2012

Not just mobile version. The site should be based on "Responsive Design".

8. jael206

Posts: 147; Member since: Jul 18, 2012

check out

9. pyradark

Posts: 895; Member since: Jun 10, 2012

kinda expensive!!

10. lethalmemo

Posts: 13; Member since: Sep 03, 2012

Excellent price for such a lovely design device...

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.