x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

LG G4 Review

LG G4 9
Pages
LG G4 Review

LG G4 Review
LG G4 Review
LG G4 Review
LG G4 Review
LG G4 Review
LG G4 Review
LG G4 Review
LG G4 Review
LG G4 Review
LG G4 Review
LG G4 Review
Introduction


Coming in second, third, or even fourth place in the Android smartphone space deserves adulation, mainly because there’s just a vast collection of handset makers eagerly trying to snag a piece of the pie. However, when you’re constantly being overshadowed by another company, the expectations to improve results and rise to the occasion become higher – almost making any sort of attempt be regarded as futile, unfortunately. That’s the reality that LG has been facing for the last several years, as Samsung has been continuously managing to grab the lion's share of the Android market.

Already, Sammy has hit gold with its latest flagship line, which only makes it more difficult for LG to make any headway in closing the gap between it and the unstoppable beast. Needless to say, the bar has been set high for everyone else, but where other phones invoke minimal attention due to their lackluster specs sheet, boring design, or terrible performance, the LG G4 is on an aggressive approach to make a daring statement. Crazy to say, not every successive phone is a staunch improvement over its predecessor – either that, or in some rare instances, they’re worse!

Looking back at LG’s track record, there’s no denying that the company is all about making long-lasting impressions. In fact, they did that last year with the LG G3, one of the first commercially available smartphones to offer a pixel crushing resolution of quad-HD (1440 x 2560) with its screen. It’s back again here with the G4, unsurprisingly, but don’t be fooled that this successor is just going to sit pretty and let the competition breeze past it. Everything about this phone has been retooled and reworked to ensure it’s a flagship worthy enough for all to “see the great, feel the great.” So, has LG managed to pull it off?

The package contains:

  • Wall charger
  • microUSB cable

Design

The genuine leather back of the LG G4 gives it a distinct, high-quality feel, but the phone's also available in plastic.

Unless you’ve own or used an LG G3, most people would argue that the LG G4 looks very similar to its predecessor – and that’s certainly true to an extent. However, there are subtle differences that make it an undeniably iterative design, as opposed to a dramatic one that we’ve been seeing in other recent phones. In particular, it now features a more hard-lined style, subtle curvature defined by its Slim Arc design, and a brand spanking new vegetable tanned genuine leather material (provided you go for the leather variant, and not the plastic one).

Yes folks, you read that correct, the G4 can be picked up with a casing that’s comprised out of vegetable tanned leather, a process that we're told takes approximately 3 months to complete. The result, surprisingly enough, feels pretty sweet and adds a higher degree of sophistication to an otherwise ‘more of the same’ phone. Seriously, though, this leather feels a lot smoother and more durable than the leather options for the Moto X – it’s not as malleable or mushy feeling. Throw in the Gütermann Mara style stitching running straight through the middle, it really delivers an elegant package that’s both classical and timeless.

Offering more personalization to the consumer, the leather back covers are removable and available in 6 beautiful colors. Alternatively, the G4 can be bought with the usual plastic base material, but with a specific 3D diamond shaped pattern that disperses light in an interesting manner at different angles. If it weren’t for the new genuine leather material option, the LG G4’s design would otherwise be a boring one lost in a world filled with more premium offerings – there’s nothing too polarizing about it at that point. Thankfully, though, they’re able to mix things up.

Normally, successive smartphones tend to achieve a slightly more compact frame that their predecessors, but in the case of the G4, that’s not quite the reality. Even though it retains the same sized screen, the G4’s body is longer, wider, thicker, and heavier than the G3 before it – so it’s a handful to say the least, requiring two-handed operation more than none for most people. Despite that, the curvature of the phone provides a pretty ergonomic feel in the hand, since our hand naturally wraps around its back.

A signature design choice for LG, the power button and volume controls are again found in the rear of the phone, where our index finger gently rests over them as we’re holding it. While this placement seems to be a logical one, especially when our finger naturally falls onto them in a holding position, it’s almost impossible to adjust the volume if it’s placed in some sort of cradle – whether it’s the car or at home, there’s just no easy access to it.

Rounding things out, the top edge of the phone is home to its IR blaster and noise cancelling mic – while the bottom is occupied by its microUSB port, 3.5mm headphone jack, and standard mic. There’s a small slit on the bottom right area of the phone that allows us to pry off its rear casing, uncovering the removable 3000 mAh battery, microSIM slot, and microSD card slot. Although everything appears fine and dandy, which it is, the additional amenities pale in comparison to what we see and get in other flagships – such as a water resistant construction, finger print sensor, and even wireless charging/rapid charging.


LG G4
5.86 x 3 x 0.39 inches
148.9 x 76.1 x 9.8 mm
5.47 oz (155 g)

LG G4

HTC One M9
5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches
144.6 x 69.7 x 9.61 mm
5.54 oz (157 g)

HTC One M9

Samsung Galaxy S6
5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches
143.4 x 70.5 x 6.8 mm
4.87 oz (138 g)

Samsung Galaxy S6

Motorola DROID Turbo
5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches
143.5 x 73.3 x 11.2 mm
6.21 oz (176 g)

Motorola DROID Turbo


To see the phones in real size or compare them with other models, visit our Visual Phone Size Comparison page.

LG G4 Review

Display

Colors are purposefully overblown and saturated. It’s nowhere close to being the most color accurate screen, but it has that drawing factor with its saturated tones.

LG G4 Review
Last year, we were utterly amazed by the introduction of the G3’s quad-HD resolution display, one that brought even more detail and pixels than any other screen before it. Back for round two, the LG G4 ensures that it’s still a relevant thing in the space because it’s fashioned with a new 5.5-inch 1440 x 2560 (quad-HD) IPS Quantum Display, one that LG boldly claims to offer 20% greater color reproduction, 25% stronger brightness output, and 50% better contrast than the G3’s screen. Not only that, but it’s meant to deliver vibrant colors because it’s apparently been calibrated for DCI (Digital Camera Initiatives) standards.

Details have never been an issue with the G3’s screen, so it’s no surprise it’s not an issue here either because the G4’s quad-HD resolution and 538 ppi pixel density deliver some amazingly crisp details! There are plenty of them, trust us.

During the G4’s official announcement, LG talked big about its new display technology – the IPS Quantum Display, which LG mentions to offer high-contrast, vibrant images that are true-to-life. We’ll give it credit for doing that, but it’s mainly noticeable when you’re running the camera interface and comparing the colors you see in real life to what the display is showing. However, as we dive deeper and check out its color accuracy under the color gamut chart, it reveals the undeniable truth that the panel favors a saturated production – something that’s made more profound as each color value in the chart is skewed from the target value.

While it’s not as accurate in color reproduction as last year’s display, the move is a purposeful one in giving this IPS Quantum Display the rich and iridescent color tones LG has promised. Sure, we can argue about its inaccuracies, but some folks won’t mind it as much, especially when it’s a drawing factor with its glow. In addition, the G4’s color temperature is a stark contrast to the G3, as it reaches a very cold color temperature of ~8000K – giving whites that noticeably bluish tone. And finally, LG ever so slightly improves the brightness with this model, since it reaches 454 nits in our testing, which is shy of the 500 nits LG mentioned it would deliver.

So, what does this tell us? LG follows through in delivering the promised proclaim that the IPS Quantum Display will deliver about 20% color gamut over the usual sRGB gamut standard, something that’s profoundly made known looking at its color gamut chart. While it’s not as accurate this time around, the decision to offer a more saturated display is a purposeful one – so greens are green, blues are dark blue, and reds are blood red. Don’t get us wrong, the display is able to stir up attention due to its rich and vibrant colors, but it’s clearly overblown to simply draw people into its glow. Is it accurate? Not really, but some folks won’t be too bummed out by that realization because it has that drawing factor.

Display measurements and quality

Maximum brightness (nits)Higher is better Minimum brightness (nits)Lower is better Contrast Higher is better Color temperature (Kelvins) Gamma Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better Delta E grayscale Lower is better
Samsung Galaxy S6 563
(Excellent)
2
(Excellent)
unmeasurable
(Excellent)
6584
(Excellent)
2.11
2.02
(Good)
2.94
(Good)
HTC One M9 508
(Excellent)
10
(Average)
1:1347
(Excellent)
8114
(Poor)
2.21
4.40
(Average)
8.24
(Poor)
LG G4 454
(Good)
2
(Excellent)
1:1930
(Excellent)
8031
(Poor)
2.24
4.36
(Average)
7.28
(Average)
Motorola DROID Turbo 248
(Poor)
9
(Average)
unmeasurable
(Excellent)
6594
(Excellent)
1.84
7.32
(Average)
3.86
(Good)
View all


174 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 04 May 2015, 07:25 9

1. TimePass (Posts: 42; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


Best in class

posted on 04 May 2015, 07:49 52

11. MrKoles (Posts: 368; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)


Yes, as you said, in its class (which is not the flagship-level).

posted on 04 May 2015, 08:31

27. Simona (unregistered)


exact. the screen remain the same as on g3 ; dark , yellowy whites , grainy text when browsing websites...
THis is really not good ..

posted on 04 May 2015, 08:53 3

33. fonelover123 (Posts: 153; Member since: 04 May 2015)


i dont trust their review on the battery performance its impossible for g4 to got a weaker battery than g3.

there were already review conducted by other experts and they found that g4's battery has really improved from last year's g3.

posted on 04 May 2015, 09:16

40. Simona (unregistered)


I am really think the batt won't be any better.. only 6-8h ? uff

posted on 04 May 2015, 09:24 1

43. fonelover123 (Posts: 153; Member since: 04 May 2015)


Elsewhere, battery life is an improvement on last year’s G3, both in terms of its capacity and according to the results from our tests. Streaming a 720p video in flight mode with the screen set to a brightness of 120cd/m2 drained it at 6.3% per hour while audio streaming over 4G drained it at 3.6%.

LG credits the phone’s improved efficiency to a number of changes, not least a more efficient screen. The G4 uses what LG calls “N-type liquid crystals”, which it says allows the light from the screen’s backlight through the structure of the liquid crystal more easily. by PCpro review

posted on 04 May 2015, 09:37 1

52. fonelover123 (Posts: 153; Member since: 04 May 2015)


see how can we trust this review? they even changed now the score 9.2 to 9.0? yes they did its only means this review is not yet finalized?

i have a supect there was a mistake in the battery just like what happen to g3 last year.

im now reducing my trust to PA they always changeable minded they should finalized thier review before showing it to the World.

posted on 04 May 2015, 15:33 6

92. marorun (Posts: 2896; Member since: 30 Mar 2015)


Its called SamsungArena not phonearena :P

posted on 04 May 2015, 09:43 2

54. gtrc11 (Posts: 32; Member since: 05 Feb 2015)


i think this is a bad review because how they do a review with a pre released unit? and in 5 days? jajaja

phone arena is really getting bad

posted on 04 May 2015, 22:55

113. SonyFindOneDroidple (Posts: 773; Member since: 11 May 2013)


G4 was launched in korea the day after the announcement though

posted on 04 May 2015, 15:32

91. marorun (Posts: 2896; Member since: 30 Mar 2015)


You need to stop taking drugs..

The G4 screen has no ghosting , the White are a bit blueish not yellowish , no grainy text when browsing but its got a less powerfull GPU Than the G3 lol.

posted on 04 May 2015, 21:49 1

107. BaffledTruffle (Posts: 505; Member since: 07 Dec 2013)


The Adreno 330 in G3 is WAY LESS powerful than the 418 in G4. Get your facts straight.

posted on 05 May 2015, 11:22 2

125. may_czos (Posts: 709; Member since: 22 Nov 2014)


There was also G3 with SD805 and Adreno 420.

posted on 05 May 2015, 13:03

131. BaffledTruffle (Posts: 505; Member since: 07 Dec 2013)


Yep, but that was a Korean exclusive and not much people know about it.

posted on 09 May 2015, 18:30 1

150. MySchizoBuddy (Posts: 144; Member since: 23 Aug 2011)


the screen is NOT the same as the G3. it only has the same resolution

posted on 20 May 2015, 06:26

159. Shocky (Posts: 2097; Member since: 16 May 2012)


That's the whole point, the resolution is the same but the GPU has less performance when compared to the SN 805 version of the LG G3.

posted on 04 May 2015, 17:42

100. cheetah2k (Posts: 1495; Member since: 16 Jan 2011)


The G4 to me is more about righting the wrongs of the G3. Its more of an incremental update/refresh than anything else.

I would say that Qualcomm are part to blame, no point producing a flagship model if the CPU cant cut the mustard....

I think Sony did a good thing by releasing the Z4 only in Japan, to enable them to focus on the Z5, which will hopefully come with a Samsung made thermal efficient Qualcomm CPU fit for the global market (820)

posted on 01 Dec 2015, 02:29

176. perry1234 (Posts: 94; Member since: 14 Aug 2012)


Alas , all the Z5's use SD810 :(

posted on 04 May 2015, 23:04

116. Chuck007 (Posts: 1005; Member since: 02 Mar 2014)


Actually I believe I read an article where a LG executive confirmed the G4 isn't their real flagship this year.

Still doesn't stop it from being a great phone nonetheless.

posted on 05 May 2015, 03:20

121. amasog (Posts: 338; Member since: 22 Aug 2013)


define flagship.

posted on 07 May 2015, 09:19

142. JimJ777 (Posts: 9; Member since: 04 May 2015)


You're on Crack..lmfao

posted on 04 May 2015, 07:53 31

12. maherk (Posts: 3366; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


no doubt. Best mid-ranger for 2015.

posted on 04 May 2015, 08:02 5

16. seven7dust (unregistered)


name one android game that won't run on this phones soc ?

posted on 04 May 2015, 15:03 1

88. romeo1 (Posts: 703; Member since: 06 Jan 2012)


All games should run but oddworld can't run at its max.
They should've gone 1080p and destroy the m9 and s6 in graphics.
The 808 isn't good enough for a flagship with 2k as the competition is ahead now.

posted on 05 May 2015, 11:24 1

126. may_czos (Posts: 709; Member since: 22 Nov 2014)


Adreno 418 in SD808 won't destroy Adreno 430 in the M9. Quite the opposite. It's even worse than Adreno 420 from last year's SD805.

posted on 05 May 2015, 15:09 1

133. romeo1 (Posts: 703; Member since: 06 Jan 2012)


Thats true but its not comparable as with the 418 and 420 won't overheat. So the 430 is killer but im not sure for how long you could go on before it gets uncomfortable

posted on 09 May 2015, 05:36

148. Cicero (Posts: 848; Member since: 22 Jan 2014)


Name one Android game that won't run on my old still S4 with SD600 soc?

posted on 04 May 2015, 08:03 6

17. Neros (Posts: 1016; Member since: 19 Dec 2014)


With almost the same score as the s6 (9.3)... 0.1 point more than the g4 when s6 trashes g4 in so many fields. Very biased review by PA imho.

posted on 04 May 2015, 11:40 2

65. AppleJuice (Posts: 145; Member since: 12 Sep 2013)


And tell me where the "S6 trashes the G4 in so many fields", I'll wait for your response. I like both phones, but you guys are funny.

posted on 04 May 2015, 15:34 1

93. marorun (Posts: 2896; Member since: 30 Mar 2015)


Brute power the S6 trash the G4.

Design maybe ( question of taste )
Screen quality ( question of taste )

But otherwise sorry G4 is superior.

posted on 06 May 2015, 22:10

137. pleezzzz (Posts: 30; Member since: 03 Sep 2013)


One word battery have fun playing a game for 10 mins

posted on 05 May 2015, 11:25

127. may_czos (Posts: 709; Member since: 22 Nov 2014)


Design, battery, display, performance.

posted on 20 May 2015, 07:35 1

161. Shocky (Posts: 2097; Member since: 16 May 2012)


Trashes? that's an bad choice of words.

But there are number of areas the Galaxy S6 is better.

CPU & GPU Performance
Faster Read/Write Speeds for flash memory
DDR4 vs DDR3
More Internal Storage for applications
Build Quality
Display has more accurate colours, or inaccurate if the user chooses.
Gorilla Glass 4
4K video recording
Fingerprint Scanner
Wireless Charging
Fast Charging (until LG decide to enable it)
Pulse Meter

The LG G4 has a good camera but nothing else of interest to be honest.

Unless you prefer larger displays and removable sdcard/battery.

posted on 20 May 2015, 08:05 1

162. aflaaak (Posts: 6; Member since: 16 Jun 2008)


S6 is an ugly iPhone clone, the G4 is not.

posted on 21 May 2015, 13:52 1

163. Shocky (Posts: 2097; Member since: 16 May 2012)


LG G4 looks like the OnePlus One which was released over a year ago, LG G4 design looks dated.

Galaxy S6 on other hand looks fantastic, at least according to all the reviews, blogs, magazines, websites and video reviewers etc. You can disagree all you want but it won't change the fact the Galaxy S6 is a great looking device and you are in the minority with your opinion.

iPhone 6 also looks very nice, don't really care who copies who so long the end result looks good, feels good and best of all has the performance to match.

posted on 05 May 2015, 03:22 1

122. amasog (Posts: 338; Member since: 22 Aug 2013)


why not make your own review so that you will have no more complaint?

LOL!

posted on 04 May 2015, 10:40 1

60. Kakarotto (Posts: 251; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)


Expensive mid-ranger

posted on 04 May 2015, 11:36 3

64. AppleJuice (Posts: 145; Member since: 12 Sep 2013)


You guys are pure haters or something. Mid-ranger because of what? Because it doesn't have the exynos or the ufs? Lol! Go check Android Authority's comparison agains the S6, apps open faster on the G4. A joke.

posted on 04 May 2015, 16:09 4

97. Kakarotto (Posts: 251; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)


I saw comparison on youtube and apps load faster on S6

posted on 04 May 2015, 10:21 3

58. waddup121 (unregistered)


G4 is G FLEXIN! Great score. Was expecting a 9.5 if the display wasn't so oversaturated (...They pulled a Samsung!) But nonetheless this phon is a great performer, and will bring rivials to the smartphone industry.

posted on 04 May 2015, 10:58 2

62. f35hunter (Posts: 231; Member since: 12 Dec 2013)


When I first read the article the rating was 9.2 and now the has been downgraded to 9.0. WTF phonearena

posted on 05 May 2015, 11:25 1

128. may_czos (Posts: 709; Member since: 22 Nov 2014)


It should be even below that.

posted on 04 May 2015, 18:14

101. waddup121 (unregistered)


100th comment!

posted on 04 May 2015, 07:30 22

2. Kakarotto (Posts: 251; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)


Wow over 1 hour shorter battery life than S6 and no quick charging. This score is a joke.
It should get below 9.0

posted on 04 May 2015, 07:57 11

13. Neros (Posts: 1016; Member since: 19 Dec 2014)


Terrible battery life, average screen, average design, average hardware, laggy UI, and PA gives it 9.2? Didn't s6 got 9.2 as well? Wow, this is so BS, PA. This phone should've been 8.7-8.9. It's an average design.

posted on 04 May 2015, 08:19 3

21. dimas (Posts: 1818; Member since: 22 Jul 2014)


LG's mistake was using a 5.5" without upping the battery capacity. Even if they market quantum dot display, it is still a 5.5" QHD. I'm only waiting for one last flagship, the Z4 international unless LG can create a G4 mini that can impress people.

posted on 04 May 2015, 08:36 6

29. hallihallo.87 (Posts: 30; Member since: 07 Jul 2014)


Laggy UI?
You sound clever ;)
Do you own a LG and more precisely, do you own a G4?

posted on 04 May 2015, 08:54 1

34. fonelover123 (Posts: 153; Member since: 04 May 2015)


you are right bro.

this is only based on the review by PhoneArena's Jhon and there are other better reviews for the g4 most epecially on the battery .

posted on 04 May 2015, 11:34

63. Pinocchio (banned) (Posts: 141; Member since: 14 Apr 2015)


This review sucks! And PA gets many wrong spec of the G4. It does HAVE Quick Charge 2.0 feature that they failed to mention. Im waitning for an unbiased review from GSMArena.

posted on 04 May 2015, 09:26 1

44. fonelover123 (Posts: 153; Member since: 04 May 2015)


Elsewhere, battery life is an improvement on last year’s G3, both in terms of its capacity and according to the results from our tests. Streaming a 720p video in flight mode with the screen set to a brightness of 120cd/m2 drained it at 6.3% per hour while audio streaming over 4G drained it at 3.6%.

LG credits the phone’s improved efficiency to a number of changes, not least a more efficient screen. The G4 uses what LG calls “N-type liquid crystals”, which it says allows the light from the screen’s backlight through the structure of the liquid crystal more easily. by PCpro review

posted on 04 May 2015, 12:03

68. hotshot123 (Posts: 3; Member since: 04 May 2015)


and i say advertising, advertising everywhere

posted on 05 May 2015, 03:24

123. amasog (Posts: 338; Member since: 22 Aug 2013)


"... laggy UI,..."

you mean laggy OS?

posted on 07 May 2015, 09:09

141. Shocky (Posts: 2097; Member since: 16 May 2012)


The more reviews I read here more clear it comes they have an agenda.

Many or the comparisons and scoring don't make any sense.

posted on 07 May 2015, 10:56

145. LGisgood (Posts: 833; Member since: 23 Jun 2012)


HOW IS THE G4 BATTERY PERFORMANCE?
During this last week of testing, the G4 stood up to my usual workload -- chatting up storms on Slack or Hangouts, listening to lengthy tomes in Audible, playing games in the bathroom and so on -- for entire workdays before it gave up the ghost. There were even a few times where, after having fallen asleep through episodes of Daredevil, I'd wake up the next day to see my phone had only just fired up its battery saver mode. On average, that worked out to between 13 and 14 hours of pretty consistent use a day before needing a trip to a power outlet -- the Galaxy S6 twins, on the other hand, usually stuck around for closer to 12. When I put the G4 through the standard Engadget video-rundown test (looping a 720p video with screen brightness set to 50 percent), it lasted for 11 hours and two minutes, clearly beating the S6's nearly nine-hour runtime.

posted on 08 May 2015, 06:51 1

147. Napalm_3nema (Posts: 2084; Member since: 14 Jun 2013)


Yes, every review I have read so far states superior battery life to the S6 except Phone Arena's.

posted on 09 May 2015, 09:21 1

149. LGisgood (Posts: 833; Member since: 23 Jun 2012)


As for battery life itself, the G4 could be a good choice for buyers disappointed by usage times of the Galaxy S6. I've been getting around 16 hours per day with mixed usage consisting of web browsing, messaging, music streaming and photography using the rear camera. Phil has seen about the same. With more intensive usage patterns on LTE, with heavier camera use, this figure dropped to around 14 hours. To put that in terms of screen-on time, I've been getting around 4 hours with mixed indoor and outdoor use on Wifi and LTE.

You'll get a full day comfortably, but little more.
For most of us, that's not sufficient to comfortably squeeze a second day's use out of a single charge. But it is enough that I'm not worrying about the G4 needing a mid-day top-up, as many GS6 owners including our own editors have found.

androidcentral

phone arena should now correct their review on the g4's battery and set the same method they have done on the s6 so we can get the most correct score.

most of the reviews agreed g4 has better battery than s6.

posted on 29 May 2015, 03:45

166. Juzh123 (Posts: 9; Member since: 29 May 2015)


most subjective reviews did, yes. lol

posted on 29 May 2015, 04:42

167. Juzh123 (Posts: 9; Member since: 29 May 2015)


and gsm arena

posted on 04 May 2015, 07:34

3. yaniv00 (Posts: 15; Member since: 02 Jun 2014)


On the second part, you wrote "we had zero issues while surfing the web in the G3" instead of G4

posted on 04 May 2015, 07:36 2

4. samsboy (unregistered)


Sorry G4. I was expecting to be your father. If your parents can lower your price I may be encouraged to adoption you.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

LG G4

LG G4

OS: Android 6.0 5.1
view full specs
Display5.5 inches, 1440 x 2560 pixels (538 ppi) IPS LCD
Camera16 megapixels
Hardware
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808, Hexa-core, 1800 MHz, ARM Cortex-A53 and ARM Cortex-A57 processor
3072 MB RAM
Size5.86 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches
(148.9 x 76.1 x 9.8 mm)
5.47 oz  (155 g)
Battery3000 mAh, 19 hours talk time

Latest stories