Nokia Asha 300 User Reviews

daneos posted on 07 Mar 2013, 05:59

5

decent phone

daneos has owned it for less than year before publishing this review

The Nokia Asha 300 is a good phone to have if you lose your phone and will only be using it for a short amount of time. I kept mine and used it whenever I lost or couldn't find my phone. Not having wi-fi connectivity is a huge flaw, but is partially made up by the internet sharing option.

Build quality 5/10 there isnt much about the build but the touchscreen is a good feature. a problem is that it isnt heat sensitive, so it is easy to accidentaly press buttons

Reception 5/10

Call quality 9/10

Internet 3/10 there is no wifi

Multimedia 8/10 there is no problem with multimedia, but the preset music is not very good

Camera 4/10 the camera needs to be better quality

UI speed 4/10 the internet is pretty slow even with full bars

Everyday usage 6/10 the everyday usage is pretty average

Text input 2/10 if you are going to make a touchscreen phone, why not make it fully touchscreen?

Display 5/10 the visibility was low at an angle and in direct sunlight

Battery 4/10 it needs regular charging

Pros

• almost impossible to break

Cons

• no wifi
• the default app for fb and twitter, 'communities' isnt very well thought out

daneos alternatives:

Huawei U8150 IDEOS

arnojanam posted on 22 Jan 2013, 01:27

9

Nokia asha300

arnojanam has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review

Nice phone with good camera. call quality is excellent. high speed proccesor. 2G speed is very low but 3G is high speed. resistive touch screen was not performed good. it has a low battery life. it lack wi-fi and gps.

Build quality 8/10

Reception 9/10

Call quality 10/10

Internet 9/10

Multimedia 9/10

Camera 9/10

UI speed 8/10

Everyday usage 9/10

Text input 9/10

Display 8/10

Battery 7/10

Pros

• internet with 3.5G network
• good call quality.
• camera with 5MP
• 1GHZ processor
• small in size
• 3.5 jack music system
• soft key for message and have conversation view
• proxymity sensor

Cons

• resistive touch screen
• low screen resolution (240*320)
• low pixel density
• low battery life
• lack wi-fi
• gps is absent
• it lack flash and autofocus
• lack light sensor

Abhijith56 posted on 22 Jan 2013, 01:33

9

my phone

Abhijith56 has owned it for less than year before publishing this review

which is a quite nice phone that i had used for the last 8 months and have good 3.5G network. 5mp camera and video recorder with 30fps but lack auto focus. but low battery life. it lack wi-fi. and low screen resolution of 240*320.

Build quality 8/10

Reception 9/10

Call quality 10/10

Internet 8/10

Multimedia 7/10

Camera 8/10

UI speed 8/10

Everyday usage 7/10

Text input 8/10

Display 8/10

Battery 7/10

Pros

• 5 mp camera
• 3.5G
• ighz processor

Cons

• lack wi-fi
• resistive touckscreen

ivanzinho posted on 15 Mar 2012, 21:17

6

This phone is just a phone with HSDPA

ivanzinho has owned it for less than month before publishing this review

If you receive a call, it just shows the contact name, not its number what it's really important in order to differentiate if the contact is calling from the work, home, cellphone, and so on. Keys are very hard to press, "send" and "end" keys are very thinner, this is annoying because you have to be very sure you are ending the call or calling. Resistive touchscreen sucks. I just use it to make calls and connect to internet via bluetooth. Internet is really fast.

Build quality 5/10

Reception 10/10

Call quality 10/10

Internet 5/10

Multimedia 7/10

Camera 7/10

UI speed 1/10

Everyday usage 5/10

Text input 5/10

Display 1/10

Battery 5/10

Pros

• Internet is really fast

Cons

• keys are very hard to press