Samsung Galaxy S III User Reviews
Overal user rating
The overall rating is the average of all user reviews, while the overall alternatives are the ones that has been listed most.
Call quality9/10Battery8.3/10Reception8.9/10Display8.9/10Build quality7.7/10Text input8.7/10Everyday usage8.8/10UI speed8.3/10Camera8.9/10Multimedia9.1/10Internet9/10
Post new review
Please note that each user review reflects the opinion of its respectful author and not of Phone Arena.
posted on 07 Nov 2014, 07:39 (Posts: 0; Member since: 18 Oct 2014)
Love it, just a bit laggy for me
RussMack has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
A great phone, I am struggling to find something suitable to upgrade to without bringing out a mortgage, which you don't need for this! I have used this phone for over a year now and have persevered a little to get the best from it but wouldn't really change it without a push.Build quality 9/10Reception 7/10Call quality 8/10Internet 9/10Multimedia 9/10Camera 8/10UI speed 3/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 8/10Display 10/10Battery 7/10
- Close range camera use & focus
- Struggles to read SD card
- UI lags a lot when full
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 22 Oct 2014, 08:36 (Posts: 0; Member since: 22 Oct 2014)
Best phone ont the market
damisamsung74 has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
This phone has some good features including the HD CAMERAs, HD screens, large screen 4.8 inches and also there are some good battery life which is 2100mAH. The phone runs theAndroid Jelly Bean 4.3 which isnt the latest anymore but it runs well. And anyone who said that the system doesnt run well well better check they havent been misusing the phone. The design may not inspire many but whats the point of having a good design but a phone that doesnt cost well. Now its still selling like 2 years after it was released which says something about the S3. Loving the device.Build quality 9/10Reception 8/10Call quality 8/10Internet 9/10Multimedia 9/10Camera 8/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 9/10Display 10/10Battery 10/10
Was this review helpful? Do you?Report
posted on 11 Oct 2014, 12:53 (Posts: 0; Member since: 08 Aug 2014)
Best 2012 smartphone
NăstaseFilip has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
It is an awesome phone. I like it very much. It was the best at his time. It has a nice design ( but with a cheap plastic), very good camera, awesome display (although it has only 720p) good CPU, good GPU, good battery (it charges very fast, but discharges fast, a second battery is good ). Sometimes is lagging but I have too many apps installed. Is a very good phone for everyday usage ( a second battery is good ). The internet speed is good. Games like Fifa 15 and Asphalt 8 are usually working very good, but sometimes they are lagging. It's good that a SD card can be used.Build quality 10/10Reception 10/10Call quality 10/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 10/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 10/10
- 4.8" HD screen
- Very good camera
- Internal memory
- Replaceable battery
- Micro SD card
- Sometimes is lagging
- Cheap plastic
Was this review helpful? Do you?Report
posted on 14 Sep 2014, 13:22 (Posts: 0; Member since: 14 Sep 2014)
Very Good Phone
nidhalsh has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
Perfect phone really love it it's very fast and it's easy to use it and it size is perfect you can use it by one hand i really like it more than the s4 and the 5s and the processor is so good also the GPU for playing good games performanceBuild quality 10/10Reception 10/10Call quality 9/10Internet 9/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 9/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 9/10Display 10/10Battery 8/10
posted on 01 Aug 2014, 14:22 (Posts: 0; Member since: 01 Aug 2014)
Not a bad daily driver
nickdlr has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
I had one for AT&T for about a year and a half. It doesn't do great with drops - my screen is shattered from falling 2 feet onto hardwood. Touchwiz is garbage - bloatware galore - and it shows in the UI. Besides that, the UI is pretty and works well when it works. Good screen size, pretty good camera and video recording, customizability is pretty good too. Solid phone for the price.Build quality 7/10Reception 8/10Call quality 9/10Internet 8/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 8/10UI speed 7/10Everyday usage 8/10Text input 8/10Display 8/10Battery 6/10
posted on 27 Jul 2014, 10:53 (Posts: 269; Member since: 29 Mar 2014)
Not that bad.
na7noo7 has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
I have had it for 1 year and a half, I liked the screen but I hate the plastic build, terrible UI Speed, and the battery drains fast. Overall it's a great phone, it's getting a bit outdated so I decided to post a review now.Build quality 3/10Reception 8/10Call quality 9/10Internet 8/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 7/10UI speed 1/10Everyday usage 9/10Text input 5/10Display 10/10Battery 9/10
- Great screen for watching movies
- Android OS
- 8MP rear camera
- Quad Core processor
- Battery drains fast
- Laggy UI
- Terrible plastic build
- Too much Bloatware
1 out of 3 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 13 May 2014, 10:46 (Posts: 0; Member since: 13 May 2014)
Very good overall phone
domdom2609 has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
I think overall it is well rounded cant really complain, I might even dare call it the best phone of its year and one of the most anticipated 8.1mp camera is more than enough and android is easy to use.Build quality 9/10Reception 10/10Call quality 10/10Internet 9/10Multimedia 9/10Camera 10/10UI speed 8/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 8/10
- Overall an Amazing Phone and well rounded
- isn't as fast as I want it to be sometimes and sometimes lags when playing music for example
posted on 09 May 2014, 04:52 (Posts: 0; Member since: 12 Jan 2014)
Very good phone!Best for its price!
VladimirM has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
S3 is a perfect phone.Display is very nice and clean, good colors and viewing angels.Processor quad core is very good, and works very well, it can handle everything.I mostly like a camera.Makes outstanding photos!Has many features, I think that made of S2 and S3 is best thing Samsung ever did.Honestly, i like more S3 then S4.Phone is totally worth the money, in Serbia new phone is 210 Euros, which is awsome price for this device.Buy it, you wont regret it!Build quality 10/10Reception 10/10Call quality 10/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 10/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 10/10
- Build Quality!
- 1GB Ram!
- MicroSD Slot!
- No cons at all.
5 out of 5 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 24 Apr 2014, 19:42 (Posts: 3; Member since: 24 Apr 2014)
It was good.....for awhile
Jett2701 has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
The first 3 or 4 weeks i was so unbelivevably happy the phone worked amazingly. after that it lagged so much, and because of a very bad software update the speaker would randomly turn on while listening to music with headphones, samsung said there was no way to fix it....it wasnt a very big deal but a later software update stopped the camera from working so i rooted it to Cyanogen ModBuild quality 5/10Reception 6/10Call quality 6/10Internet 9/10Multimedia 6/10Camera 3/10UI speed 4/10Everyday usage 5/10Text input 9/10Display 6/10Battery 5/10
- Big Screen
- Micro SD Card Slot
- Replaceable Battery
- Battery Life
- Runs Hot
- Average Display
- Lags ALOT
1 out of 3 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 06 Apr 2014, 18:50 (Posts: 0; Member since: 06 Apr 2014)
Galaxy S3 best smartphone until Galaxy S5
tarifacarlos has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
Is the only phone capable to do everything i want. Removable battery, sd card slot, good processor... Only one disadvantage: poor ram memory. But none has good ram and the other features. Galaxy S4 is also a good smartphone, but not many changes from S3.Build quality 8/10Reception 8/10Call quality 10/10Internet 9/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 10/10UI speed 9/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 10/10
- Removable battery
- SD cards slot
- Awesome Processor
- USB OTG
- Only 1GB of RAM
5 out of 5 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 11 Mar 2014, 02:57 (Posts: 20; Member since: 11 Mar 2014)
Still holds up today
deanylev has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
I have had this phone for about just over 6 months and it's pretty great. Battery life is absolutely terrible. Display is gorgeous and camera is pretty great. Build quality sucks. Reception and calls is pretty good. 1GB lags a bit.Build quality 4/10Reception 7/10Call quality 7/10Internet 6/10Multimedia 6/10Camera 8/10UI speed 6/10Everyday usage 7/10Text input 7/10Display 9/10Battery 2/10
- Great display
- Great camera
- Great CPU
- 1GB ram
- Build quality
3 out of 6 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 08 Mar 2014, 01:01 (Posts: 0; Member since: 08 Mar 2014)
Samsung Galaxy s3:worst phone and Samsung: worst after sales service provider
vishalgupta.nitb has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
And the well reputed Samsung Mobile India finally accepted that " We will not repair your phone under warranty" in warranty time. Reason being "You have misused the phone. You would have charged your phone when light was fluctuating" and " You would have thrown your phone in water" etc etc.
Dear Samsung, please prove it if you are so sure about misusing. I could also say that I was given the faulty motherboard etc etc.
I understand it is just 10 days of my warranty time just so it is justified from your side to delay the matter. You cannot even accept the responsibility of the the issue I am facing from last 9 months, just after 2 months of purchasing. Dear Samsung Mobile India, I would like to bring to your notice that I live in a hostel where there are many persons charge their phone at a time. If fluctuation would have happened, many of my hostel mates' phones of the brands like zen,lava,spice etc would have burnt completely. But no other motherboard is burnt except my flagship phone S3's motherboard. I was fool to pay a huge 30k money for a phone I thought will be the value for money. I should have purchased the phones worth 10k (the money you are asking now to replace motherboard) of the brands lava, spice etc giving same feature as yours whose motherboards can bear minor light fluctuations. Dear Samsung, I have purchased and paid the huge sum for S3 just for your brand. I had never thought that would be the worst decision of my life. Customer care representatives are saying...Build quality 3/10Reception 2/10Call quality 7/10Internet 6/10Multimedia 4/10Camera 7/10UI speed 5/10Everyday usage 2/10Text input 3/10Display 4/10Battery 5/10
4 out of 13 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 21 Jan 2014, 06:48 (Posts: 38; Member since: 28 Dec 2013)
Experience of Galaxy S III I9300
NationGuettaTR has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
I describe everything that i gave below 10;
build quality : It's not problem for me but not so good at the same time.
Internet : browser has lags and needs exit button.
UI Speed : Very poor. After 4.0.4 it lags too much and phone become unusable
Everyday Usage : Excellent except battery.Build quality 5/10Reception 10/10Call quality 10/10Internet 6/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 10/10UI speed 2/10Everyday usage 9/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 10/10
- 4.8" HD AMOLED Screen
- 8.6mm thinness
- Corning GG2 Protection
- Exynos 4412 Quad-Core processor
- Expandable Storage up to 64 gb
- Near Field Communication
- 720x1280P Screen resolution
- 1 Gb RAM (It's not enough to work on Jelly bean ROM)
- Too much laggy UI (TouchWiz Nature UX & UX 2.0)
- Get updates too late
7 out of 8 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 17 Jan 2014, 09:12 (Posts: 1; Member since: 17 Jan 2014)
MrCharlieGCarr has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
This was my first 'proper' smartphone, and I cannot believe how bad it is, first of all the UI; it lagged using the stock Android supplied to an infuriating degree. I managed to rectify this by installing Cyanogen Mod, which improved things no end. Camera is poor; there's too many cons to mentionBuild quality 1/10Reception 10/10Call quality 5/10Internet 9/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 5/10UI speed 3/10Everyday usage 4/10Text input 10/10Display 7/10Battery 1/10
- Nice screen size
- Expandable by Micro-SD (32GB)
- Almost universal charger
- Awful lag on stock UI
- Poor battery life
- Very easily damaged
- Flimsy construction
- Generates a lot of heat (battery)
- Poor battery life
- Because of the rate new phones are brought out, it makes it redundant within less than half a year
- Lack of updates
- App crashes
1 out of 11 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 21 Dec 2013, 01:49 (Posts: 0; Member since: 21 Dec 2013)
entactix has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
I've owned Samsung's old flagship smartphone for over a year (even an hour seems like an eternity in hell), and the experience left an astoundingly bitter taste.
I've constantly experienced lag issues, painfully slow performance in almost all situations - for example: the stock camera or browser would take 5-8 seconds to start up, random restarts, apps freezing. I tried every official and unofficial tip and workaround I could get - to no avail.
It was all blamed - of course - on issues with the way I used the phone, app problems and so on - until allowing support to test the phone personally. While they were looking for a solution, the phone died completely (good timing, for once) and I was issued a refurbished unit as a replacement. New phone, same problems, but this one didn't completely sign off, so I was stuck with it, waiting for an "update that would solve such issues".
Apart from the phone issues, I went through 4 (four) chargers in 9 months - eventually, something would happen to them that would cause an inexplicably slow charge (about 30% over 7 hours). Once I switched to using chargers from other manufacturers, the charging issues stopped.
Since I know people who did not experience these problems, it might have just been bad luck (twice in a row), but such crippling software issues, cheap-looking exterior and unhelpful support make this phone a laughable "flagship". As long as the company sticks to these practices, I will not buy a Samsung smartphone again.Build quality 6/10Reception 9/10Call quality 9/10Internet 3/10Multimedia 7/10Camera 6/10UI speed 3/10Everyday usage 2/10Text input 1/10Display 9/10Battery 6/10
- Beautiful display
- Games would run smooth (ironically)
- Expandable memory
- Poor performance in all situations
- Unexplicable lagging & restarting
- Poor support
- Slow, bloated UI
- Low quality feel and look
- Slow to come updates
4 out of 15 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 11 Dec 2013, 21:31 (Posts: 1; Member since: 11 Dec 2013)
andruch12 has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
i bought it because it was on sale unlocked in my country and turned out to be amazing. I have wished to have since it's release and i can tell wasn't dissapointed. The phone itsef is gorgeous, but seems too fragile so with a case y seems much more heavier and thicker, but that's just personal opinion. Overall the performance is great, i have encounter any issues except that it heats a lot when playing games, any kind even with the ones of low graphics.Build quality 9/10Reception 10/10Call quality 9/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 10/10UI speed 9/10Everyday usage 9/10Text input 9/10Display 9/10Battery 8/10
- Great camera
- Gorgeous Display
- Very Fast
- Very Nice to the eye
- Great audio output
- Heats, a lot on heavy usage
- Battery could've been better
9 out of 10 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 06 Dec 2013, 14:26 (Posts: 0; Member since: 06 Dec 2013)
an excellent smartphone
jojo2000 has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
It is from the best smartphones the screen is very nice and wonderful ,very fast, very nice design, very light, nice camera, nice u,i i like my samsung galaxy s3 and it is ana excellent smartphone with high specs.Build quality 10/10Reception 10/10Call quality 10/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 10/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 10/10
- wonderful display
- very good camera
- fast proccessor
- big display
- very nice design
- 1 gb of ram
5 out of 9 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 16 Nov 2013, 11:36 (Posts: 0; Member since: 16 Nov 2013)
pablosav has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
It could be a great phone, but it have a lot of problems. it have a great camera, and good quality of phone calls. But it was so slow, and it was too much laggy, I see others sgs3 and everyone have the same problems. I finally changed for a Xperia ZL and i am happy. But i don't understand why google nexus and motorola doesn't have fm radio, micro sd, and physical camera button.Build quality 8/10Reception 7/10Call quality 10/10Internet 7/10Multimedia 9/10Camera 9/10UI speed 5/10Everyday usage 6/10Text input 9/10Display 7/10Battery 6/10
- micro sd
- nice headphones with volume
6 out of 9 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 01 Nov 2013, 22:35 (Posts: 6; Member since: 11 Oct 2013)
josh_dent910 has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
This phone is great for everyday use! Really awesome to customize however the TouchWiz Nature UX lags nearly every time I go to the home screen however I'm used to the cellphone and I love it! I really do enjoy the vivid colours of the screen. It makes the photos look even better!Build quality 9/10Reception 8/10Call quality 8/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 9/10Camera 10/10UI speed 7/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 9/10Display 9/10Battery 8/10
- TouchWiz Nature UX sometimes lags
12 out of 14 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 20 Oct 2013, 13:46 (Posts: 0; Member since: 20 Oct 2013)
stephanosd has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
Not the phone everyone was telling me how good it is. it's not fast, crashes android apps, such as messaging and contacts. The build quality is not the one of a 500 euros flagship.Screen is horrible, with unnatural colors.Build quality 3/10Reception 8/10Call quality 8/10Internet 8/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 9/10UI speed 5/10Everyday usage 6/10Text input 7/10Display 6/10Battery 6/10
- Good Camera
- Really Laggy
4 out of 9 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 19 Oct 2013, 04:28 (Posts: 0; Member since: 12 Oct 2013)
Great Phone !
RavX96 has owned it for less than year before publishing this review
it's great but the gorilla glass is weak but this one is the affordable mid range phone for the price !
the ui is kinda slow because of touchwiz ui but without animation it's fast and it's easy to hadle but the build quality is not greatBuild quality 6/10Reception 8/10Call quality 10/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 8/10Camera 9/10UI speed 9/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 9/10Display 9/10Battery 7/10
- Great Specs
- Worth the Price
- Easy to Hadle
3 out of 4 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 18 Oct 2013, 00:02 (Posts: 0; Member since: 17 Oct 2013)
satwik has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review
Weak glass the phone felt from my hand from at least 1 metre and the toich gorilla glass crashed..
Tell me what to do
Only gorilla glass is crased but the service centre asked me to replace the display costs worth rs 6500
But phone is very sensitive as it wasBuild quality 2/10Reception 10/10Call quality 10/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 10/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 5/10
5 out of 8 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 15 Oct 2013, 19:24 (Posts: 0; Member since: 15 Oct 2013)
Daewonsong has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
This is the first phone I've ever had, and I gotta say, it's pretty amazing. I've had it for about a week now, and I haven't had a single problem with it. Except the battery, it kinda drains quick but I'll figure something out lol.Build quality 10/10Reception 10/10Call quality 10/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 10/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 8/10
- Simply amazing.
- It does everything.
- Great camera quality, love it.
- Fits nicely in the hand.
- At first, it was hart typing with it, but after a week, I'm getting used to it.
- Lots of free apps.
- Great sound quality.
- Battery seems to drain fster than it should, but I'll figure something out.
6 out of 8 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 02 Oct 2013, 04:54 (Posts: 1; Member since: 30 Sep 2013)
giorgi has owned it for less than 3 months before publishing this review
I love SGS 3 it's extremely beautiful device. It is very powerful. It is very good for me. Omm gosh. I don't like SGS4 because it is a very big and uncomfortable. Oh I don't know what I write maan. It's so bad that you must write 200 characterBuild quality 10/10Reception 10/10Call quality 10/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 10/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 10/10
3 out of 7 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report
posted on 25 Sep 2013, 18:58 (Posts: 0; Member since: 22 Sep 2013)
the best phone i ever have
yousef.gamal has owned it for less than month before publishing this review
Samsung galaxy s3 is the best smartphone at all.
S3 vs HTC ONE x:
In addition htc one x has got a faster cpu,but it isn't used as well as Samsung's. for example in SGS3 you can see your video when you are sending a message.or when you are browsing web,you see that samsung is too better than htc.
Also SGS3 uses a 4.8 Super AMOLED screen that takes much less charge than Super IPS LCD which is used in htc one x and the colors are more living in SGS3.
S3 vs Apple iphone 5 :
It is not fair to compare iphone5 with SGS 3! Because iphone 5 has come after SGS3. But you can not compare the Quad core1400 MHz cpu of the SGS3 with the Dual core 1300MHz cpu of the iphone5!
I have to say that apple has got a very good Build quality and everyone knows that but it doesn't mean that apple is better.I think both of them are good phones but SGS3 has got a better results than iphone 5.Build quality 10/10Reception 10/10Call quality 10/10Internet 10/10Multimedia 10/10Camera 10/10UI speed 10/10Everyday usage 10/10Text input 10/10Display 10/10Battery 9/10
4 out of 7 people found this review helpful. Do you?Report