LG G2 is officially announced with Snapdragon 800, 5.2-inch True Full HD display
The unusual button placement is among the things that make the LG G2 totally unique. Instead of putting them on the side, the maker has decided to place them on the handset’s back. Supposedly, these will be easy to reach no matter which hand the LG G2 is being used with, but whether that’s the case will become clear as soon as we take the smartphone for a spin. These buttons can be used to not only set the phone's volume, but to perform additional tasks as well. The volume up key, for example, will activate the notes application when held down, while the volume down key can launch the camera app and will snap a photo when pressed. Again, we're wondering how comfortable it will be to use a camera shutter placed in such an odd position. No physical buttons are present on the G2's front as virtual ones are in use instead.
A spacious, 5.2-inch IPS LCD display with an amazingly thin bezel graces the front of the LG G2. Its resolution of 1080 by 1920 pixels ensures that everything on it will look nice and sharp, especially knowing that a standard RGB sub-pixel arrangement has been implemented. The screen panel will be countering the sun's rays with 450 nits of maximum brightness output. Through the use of Graphic RAM technology, LG claims to have reduced the panel's energy needs by an amazing 26%.
Solidifying the smartphone’s high-end status is the presence of a Snapdragon 800 SoC under its hood. With a quad-core CPU running at 2.3GHz and 2GB of RAM, the handset’s performance should be nothing short of outstanding no matter what is being thrown at it – 1080p videos, intense 3D gaming, hi-def video capturing, you name it.
LG G2 official images
14. zig8100 (Posts: 140; Member since: 13 Dec 2012)
Dope phone but they still have to prove their going to keep up with Software Updates.
79. davenycept (Posts: 175; Member since: 03 Jul 2012)
Thank you!! That's my one and only thing... I still have a gs2 from T-Mobile running stock 4.1.2... will it be getting timely updates? If so then I'm on it
28. Kurai (unregistered)
Hmmm . . the design is not really new . . . it's design is very similar to s4(at the front at least) but with more smaller bezels . . . overall it is a beast . . . but the design is not sexy at all . . .
66. MCrapp (Posts: 312; Member since: 07 Apr 2013)
LG use Plastic almost identical with Galaxy S4! But I don't see any Plastics comments? Front looks good (I love small bezels) but back and that LG logo........
86. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1127; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
Because until now, we still don’t know how well G2 design construction.
If G2 has the same performance as the S4 in the drop test, you will definitely see comments about plastic.
2. dmat3889 (Posts: 14; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
LG-G2 aka the Galaxy S4.2
slightly better but same phone.
3. rms.max (Posts: 82; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)
Nokia set the new standard..haha..Every body is going for OIS.. lol
15. dexter_jdr (Posts: 1161; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)
definitely true. haha
nokia is leading them in terms of new USABLE features
58. boosook (Posts: 1070; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)
LOL... for example? which features? the always-on voice commands or active notifications of the moto x? the front dual speakers of the htc one? the water resistance of the xperia Z? the gigantic battery of the razr maxx? tell me which are those new usable features of the Nokias... ;)
78. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3019; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
Cool it tiger!
You shelled out a lot of OEMs to compare with Nokia.
But here, they're talking about the OIS...and yes, among the list that you gave Nokia did have a phone with dual front stereo speakers...even my old XM 5530 had it.
If you're talking about the Boom sound then yes...they're the first.
83. dexter_jdr (Posts: 1161; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)
HOW THE HELL IS VOICE COMMAND A FEATURE? if moto just made it "always on"
HOW THE HELL IS DUAL SPEAKERS ON HTC A FEATURE? if even nokia 5800xpressmusic did that in 2008.
HOW THE HELL IS WATER RESISTANT ON XPERIA Z A FEATURE? if that feature is already made +10 years ago for any portable device.
HOW THE HELL IS A GIANT BATTERY A FEATURE? any fvcking company can do that if they want to.
edit your last word with phone companies d!ckhead. and tell me how sh!tty is your excuses against nokia. i exagerated the above comments.but until now i dont see other companies copying/implementing always on, dual speaker(except china phones- 2 or more speakers are in 1 phone), water proof, big ass battery for their true flagships.
--on my comment NOKIA IS 'LEADING' THEM ON USABLE FEATURES. IM TALKING TO OIS BECAUSE HTC ONE AND NOW LG G2 ADDED THEM AFTER THEY SAW 920 WITH IT.
i used capslock on major sentences because your brain is too small to read it clearly. sorry about your condition.
31. Dr.Phil (Posts: 921; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
Except Nokia wasn't the first one to bring OIS to smartphones, so they weren't the one to set the new standard. It was actually Sharp that set this "new standard".
EDIT: Just to clarify, Sharp introduced this technology in 2011. The Lumia 920, which I believe was the first Nokia smartphone to utilize OIS, wasn't introduced until about a year later.
56. milesboy5 (Posts: 164; Member since: 07 Nov 2012)
But ok who here has a Sharp phone?? Nokia definitely marketed and used its brand recognition to make OIS a more common feature on smartphones.
67. Dr.Phil (Posts: 921; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
Sharp technology has been used by many phone manufacturers, including Samsung and Apple. For instance, the IGZO display developed by Sharp is most likely going to be seen in future tablets offered by Samsung and Apple. So, I would say that even without the Lumia 920, the big smartphone manufacturers were most likely already interested in this technology. Just like when Sony released the Exmor RS, there were tons of manufacturers (such as Oppo) that wanted the technology in their next smartphone.
73. Dr.Phil (Posts: 921; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
Allow myself to expand on my previous comment by saying that you could be right that because of Nokia marketing the OIS it made the other manufacturers want it. I am just saying that, in my opinion, I think they would've been interested in it anyway. I don't think Nokia is enough of a threat yet to make Android manufacturers want to respond quickly with a competing feature or device. Windows Phone still holds somewhere around a 2% global market share (that may be an old statistic but it's somewhere in the single digits). I think Android manufacturers are more concerned with competing against their own kind. This can, and may of course, change in the future.
59. hemedans (Posts: 196; Member since: 01 Jun 2013)
but lg when they demo g2 they show how it can reduce shake, take better low light images which nokia show us september 5 2012. did ois from sharp demo that?
62. Dr.Phil (Posts: 921; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
You do understand what OIS is, right? It stands for Optical Image Stabilizer. This means that it reduces the shaking so that you can take images that are less blurred.
Better low light images have nothing to do with OIS. OIS only helps to make sure that the image is stabilized so that when the shutter stays open longer it won't have any blurring or movement.
68. rms.max (Posts: 82; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)
Phil !Because of OIS shutter stays open longer letting more light come in without any blurring. That's how you get Better low light images.FYI. Nokia was the first one to implement that perfectly with Better low light imaging..
69. Dr.Phil (Posts: 921; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
Can you not read? I mean seriously.
"OIS only helps to make sure that the image is stabilized so that when the shutter stays open longer it won't have any blurring or movement."
I mentioned that, yes, the OIS allows the shutter to stay open longer which allows better low light photography. However, the shutter being opened longer is what is really responsible for the better low light photography. The OIS just helps with that. You could put your phone on a tripod and take good low light pictures without needing OIS. The OIS just allows you to now be able to hold your phone and take good low-light photos.
And, again, Nokia was not the first to implement that. They may have been the first to take OIS and combine it with a camera that had a higher ISO or with software that allowed the shutter to remain open longer (in night scene modes), but they were not the first to implement OIS.
72. rms.max (Posts: 82; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)
Didn't You say "Better low light images have nothing to do with OIS"" ?
Yes .That's what I am saying.
" They may have been the first to take OIS and combine it with a camera that had a higher ISO or with software that allowed the shutter to remain open longer (in night scene modes)," Don't you Understand what you are writing.?Read again what I wrote,
75. Dr.Phil (Posts: 921; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
Did you not read when I said: "You could put your phone on a tripod and take good low light pictures without needing OIS"? So, yes, my statement was correct. OIS allows better low light images while HOLDING the device because it decreases the shaking associated with the shutter being opened for long periods of time. If you want to make a blanket statement that OIS makes your nighttime photos better because you are assuming that the phrase "while holding the device" is inferred, then you can go right ahead. I was merely responding to the claims that OIS is directly responsible for better low light photography when it really only assists in that aspect. It is really the job of the shutter speed and ISO that allows you to take great nighttime photos.
80. gazmatic (Posts: 625; Member since: 06 Sep 2012)
they demonstrated it but didnt implement it
nokia was the first to mass produce it in a phone
they didnt invent OIS but set the trend to include it in celphones
82. Dr.Phil (Posts: 921; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
No, they did implement it into a smartphone, the Sharp AQUOS SH-01D.
84. dexter_jdr (Posts: 1161; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)
but still doctor phil, nokia lead them to the implementation of OIS.
sharp is shadowed and ignored even though first.
4. Commentator (Posts: 2467; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
Available on all 4 major US carriers. That's a good start.
7. papss (unregistered)
I'm pretty pumped for this phone..i can't wait for nor details regarding unique software and hopefully they don't kill support early in its life
9. Carlitos (Posts: 340; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)
Phone looks good. But um "Answer me sure sounds like Direct Call from the GS3, Gnote 2, GS4.
10. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8798; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Beautiful phone yes, but the button placement is... Different.
Watching the live blog and seeing what the phone offers.
13. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3019; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
The button placement is what bothers me most...other than that, this phone looks awesome and a killer hardware to go with. Somewhat like S4 but better...
26. Dr.Phil (Posts: 921; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
After watching the live blog, the back button placement intrigues me more. I will hold judgment until I actually use it in person, but I have to agree with their assessment that while using phones with larger screens you have to shift your hand placement in order to use the power and volume keys.
43. McLTE (Posts: 714; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
it's the opposite for me. when I use my Note2, my fingers are naturally placed near the power and volume buttons.
I find this LG to be very awkward - in portrait.
In landscape mode.. this has some promise, though I don't use my phone in landscape often.
71. blackrose (Posts: 48; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)
Beautiful not at all, looks like the s4 from the front. And very ugly at the back, the plastic looks worse than the s4. And oh yeah it's made of plastic yet no one is complaining. Isn't that a strange thing?
11. XPERIA-KNIGHT (unregistered)
Looks way better than the galaxies js
16. iushnt (Posts: 724; Member since: 06 Feb 2013)
why do you need to name galaxies here? wanna start fanboy wars?
18. MCrapp (Posts: 312; Member since: 07 Apr 2013)
But still Plastic Fantastic?! You don't like that?
20. fistigons (Posts: 263; Member since: 11 Feb 2012)
mmm snapdragon 800. I was kind of hoping for some voice activation features ala Moto X. Hopefuly the Nexus 5 and key lime pie will use this feature.
21. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8798; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Watching the liveblog, they've implemented a lot of things from HTC and Samsung...
30. Kurai (unregistered)
Samsung copied from apple. Lg is copying samsung. even Lg's commercials are copied from samsung lol . . .talk about originality . . . LG IS A THIRD HAND COPIER . . lol . . . omg originality are everywhere
34. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Who cares about who copy who anyway? Being a consumer, you want it, you buy it.
38. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8798; Member since: 14 May 2012)
G2 = S4/HTC One + S800.
And it's funny because When LG copies it's fine, but when Samsung copies or implements it differently, they're terrible. Your logic = 0.
47. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Excuse me Smurf, did I say "Samsung copies ______" on Samsung articles? No.
49. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8798; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Excuse me DROID, when don't you say Samsung is a copycat or Copysung, Shamesung, etc.?
51. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Excuse me again Smurf, as I said before, I said Samdung, Shamesung etc. is because of those jelly Fansungs. I'm not bashing Samsung.
53. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8798; Member since: 14 May 2012)
From four days ago:
S-Explode as a new feature in a Samsung phone. That's bashing.
55. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
That's because there are many news about Samsung phones explode recently, I found the S-Plode funny, that's why I said that.
I know that's bashing, but Fansungs are getting ridiculous these days, I just want to make them go mad. That's all.
I don't hate Samsung.
65. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8798; Member since: 14 May 2012)
It was one incident which wasn't Samsung's fault. It was third party battery that cause the explosion.
Calling Samsung by weird names and their fans is just... No. By you making comments like that, you're doing nothing but stepping down to their level. Just be the bigger person and avoid it.
60. boosook (Posts: 1070; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)
G2 = S4/HTC One + S800 + 2,5GHz clock + always on voice commands + optical stabilizer in the camera + 5,2'' screen (with the same external size) + 3000 mAh battery + hi-fi audio.. I can't see what they're copying from Samsung.
64. PapaSmurf (Posts: 8798; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Design and software from Samsung, it has a 2.3GHz clock speed not 2.5, and Hi-Fi audio I'll give the, credit for. 3000mAh battery is to compensate the S800.
44. MCrapp (Posts: 312; Member since: 07 Apr 2013)
xperiaDROID That LG is PLASTIC.PLASTIC CHEAP PLASTIC and I don't see Samsung Haiters?!
39. MCrapp (Posts: 312; Member since: 07 Apr 2013)
Maybe Samsung bought LG?Even LG led tv's for 2013 = Samsung TV's from 2012
63. hemedans (Posts: 196; Member since: 01 Jun 2013)
they implement many things from nokia
2.low light capabilities
3.super sensitive touch
4.guest(kid) corner (from wp)
5.screen with rich sub pixel
76. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1127; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
hahaha .... You must be drunk.
1. nokia is not the one who develops or, was the first to implement the OIS.
2. do you know to be able to have a good low-light capabilities, Nokia uses Toshiba (Pureview) and Sony (920/925/928) camera sensor, combined with the Zeiss lens and Xenon flash.
3. 6 months before it was officially announced the Lumia 920, Sony Xperia Sola has been using Super sensitive touch screen which provides the ability Xperia Sola "floating touch technology". Nokia uses technology and super-sensitive screen of the "synaptic" while Sony develop with Cypress.
4. I'm not so sure about this but most likely this feature is in fact not in kebangkan by Nokia.
5. LG uses IPS LCD which was developed by Hitachi.
The point is all the things that you mentioned are not "FROM" Nokia
22. mssaleh (Posts: 5; Member since: 07 Aug 2013)
HTC One vs. LG G2 vs. Samsung Galaxy S4 real size comparison http ://goo.gl/zWUTIs
23. lovefist (unregistered)
id take 8.9mm with 3000mah battery than thinner phone with 2000mah battery.
phone thinness is so overrated.