Apple's Shot on iPhone Challenge winners will be paid unspecified 'licensing fees' after all
We’re talking about a community of smartphone users, as well as a community of enthusiast photographers that don’t need expensive, standalone camera gear to produce stunning stills like the one above, which believe it or not, was shot on the iPhone 6s by someone who’s managed to amass an extensive Instagram following using exclusively mobile devices.
Over the years, “shot on iPhone” content grew sharper, fancier, and more complex, including actual short films, magazine covers, and many cool promo videos, so unsurprisingly, Apple decided to take things to the next level recently with a contest... of sorts.
The aptly titled Shot on iPhone Challenge was designed to “celebrate the most stunning photographs captured on iPhone”, with a panel of illustrious judges in charge of reviewing worldwide submissions and selecting 10 outstanding candidates.
Anyone can participate by simply tagging their best shots on Instagram or Twitter with the #ShotOniPhone hashtag, but apart from (arguably colossal) exposure, Apple didn’t initially seem to offer contest winners any form of compensation.
That understandably sparked outrage on social media, which quickly led to an important change in the official rules of the “challenge.” According to The Verge, a line was added in the “Prize(s)” section to clarify “winners will receive a licensing fee for use on billboards and other Apple marketing channels” of their work after all. Previously, that same part of the rulebook specifically listed the “prize” as having “no cash value.”
The January 22 Apple Newsroom post was apparently also updated to feature the company’s (newfound) “strong belief” that “artists should be compensated for their work.” Naturally, the actual “licensing fee” remains under wraps, although something tells us the ten best iPhone photographers out there will be getting more than spare change here.
After all, Apple plans to use the winning “Shot on iPhone” images to advertise its products on Twitter, Instagram, Weibo, WeChat, Apple.com, in retail stores, and even on billboards in “select cities.” That’s a massive campaign hinging on the quality of the work professional and amateur photo artists will be willing to dedicate to this project.
It would have been pretty scandalous to pay nothing for that, especially when contest submission equates to granting Apple a “royalty-free, world-wide, irrevocable, non-exclusive license for one year to use, modify, publish, display, distribute, create derivate works from and reproduce the photo.”