Huawei announces its powerful Kirin 710 processor for mid-range smartphones

Huawei announces its powerful Kirin 710 processor for mid-range smartphones
Huawei's new mobile chipset – Kirin 710 isn't really a surprise since we've reported about it about a month before the Chinese company announced it. The new mobile processor is aimed at mid-range handsets and it's supposed to compete with another chip, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 710.

However, unlike Qualcomm's Snapdragon 710 processor that's manufactured using the 10nm process, Kirin 710 utilizes TSMC's older 12nm manufacturing technology. Basically, this means that Huawei's chipset slightly bigger than Qualcomm's CPU.

According to Huawei, the Kirin 710's performance is 75% higher than that of the previous generation, the Kirin 659, whereas multi-core performance is 68% higher. Regarding the technical specifications of the new chipset, Kirin 710 accommodates eight CPUs: four Cortex-A73 clocked at 2.2GHz and four Cortex-A53 clocked at 1.7GHz.

Graphics-wise, Kirin's new chipset includes an ARM Mali G6 GPU (graphics processing unit) that's likely to be 1.3 times faster than the one packed inside the Kirin 659 chip, and 1x more energy efficient.

Last but not least, Huawei's Kirin 710 features LTE Cat.12 and 13, as well as dual-SIM and dual 4G LTE support. On a side note, the first smartphone to be powered by Huawei's Kirin 710 processor is the recently unveiled nova 3i.

FEATURED VIDEO

4 Comments

1. BullaBoss

Posts: 141; Member since: Jul 17, 2018

Should be good on 1080p displays. The flu is usually the weak link so let's see if it holds up.

2. MuddyCow

Posts: 90; Member since: Oct 09, 2014

GPU just 1.3x times more powerful? That sucks considering that the GPU on the 659 was one of its' biggest weaknesses.

3. kumarabhishek591

Posts: 150; Member since: Feb 22, 2014

Its a Mali G51 Mp4. So yes its weak.

4. AmashAziz

Posts: 2871; Member since: Jun 30, 2014

I don't want to be that guy but I think you did not spend much time checking this article. It seems poorly structured in some ways, with there also being grammatical errors and misinformation. This is usually the case with a few other articles here too. They do not seem up to par with articles from other sites such as verge. Those seem professionally written. I don't mean this to be a rant but sorry, that's how I feel. I want you guys to improve :)

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.