Samsung receives a patent for a phone that docks to power a tablet
With this design, Samsung is able to allow its smartphone to be more easily dockable with the receptacle on the back of its tablet/screen. The design makes it look like the slate is a stand-alone tablet and only the user will know that it is actually being powered by a smartphone.
Originally filled in the first quarter of 2012 in Korea and the following quarter in the U.S., Samsung was awarded patent D685,774 for "Terminal for wireless communication". Will Samsung challenge ASUS with a smartphone that can dock to a screen to power a tablet? It certainly seems that way. Considering the recent speculation that Samsung, like Apple, has lost its mojo, it could be that Samsung is hoping that something like this will boost sales.
source: ZDNetKorea (translated), PatentBolt via SlashGear
1. Topcat488 (Posts: 977; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
Samsung the "Copy King", at it again... The way this patent looks, Asus is definitely next in line to sue when Apple is done, with Samsung.
8. vincelongman (Posts: 476; Member since: 10 Feb 2013)
I think the Galaxy S is the only phone from their Galaxy S series that is a copy of the iPhone. The rest of the Galaxy S series look nothing like iPhones except being a rectangle with rounded corners and having a touchscreen.
But I don't think there should be a patent on this. Its like a car company making a van first, then other companies not being able to make vans.
25. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 5472; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
Then their shouldn't be a patent for rectangulars either.
26. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 5472; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
Then their shouldn't be a patent for rectangles either.
35. tashreef (Posts: 475; Member since: 24 Nov 2012)
it's not like a car
company making a van
first, then other
companies not being
able to make vans.
it's like a car
company making a van
first, then other
companies like "copysung" copies it and says, look this is my innovation and i have patent for this...
first phablet by dell
no wonder fansung says copysung introduced it ...
43. Rehankhan (Posts: 323; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)
You mad? you always praise nokia/m$ and hate samsung for no reason im starting to think that you are getting paid to do this
52. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 5472; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
Only some people are mad at Samsung. look at apple they copy n steal too but still got away with it.
45. rusticguy (Posts: 2810; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)
9/10 Apple patents fall in same category ... copy from others modify a bit and call it their own.
10. EXkurogane (Posts: 863; Member since: 07 Mar 2013)
Now this is really too much, they might not be trying to sue Asus for their existing products, but prevent them from making future products with such concepts. Samsung is becoming like Apple.
And many companies, not just Apple, have already accused Samsung of stealing.
13. Jason2k13 (Posts: 470; Member since: 28 Mar 2013)
yes your right, it should have been HTC, Sony or LG that did this because its only copying if samsung does it right?
Haven't you noticed that ever since Samsung made phablets, every other company is doing it to? Samsung also made samsung minis of their flagship phones, and now other companies are doing it to?
Also why would you care if a company copies another company? Dont you want the best features on your phone? If a company adds all the best features from all other companies and put it on 1 phone, id buy it in a heartbeat, i couldn't care less if it was copied or not unless I work for those companies.
14. WHoyton1 (Posts: 1616; Member since: 21 Feb 2013)
Well said jason2k13.....recently there has been a influx in Samsung haters and I fail to see why? Someone explain to me with a VALID reason why people hate Samsung!
18. Daftama (Posts: 540; Member since: 03 Nov 2012)
Lol I think these are getting paid for it... Or just stupid ignorance so what if they copied it.. Hey why r u where the same clothes the next person why are you coping him you wear different clothes... Don't we all not have 2 eyes 2 arms a pair of lips a mouth a tongue a pair of legs.... Like I said stupid ignorance
21. kaira (Posts: 26; Member since: 12 May 2013)
Too true my brother... Some are just commenting for the sake of it! Samsung copying or not, we (consumers) are winning at the end of the day!
31. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1123; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
Hey jason let me tell you something, so maybe you and other galaxies army can open their mind and stop being a closed minded fanboys.
long time ago before the android became very popular, there is a device called a “PDA” (the mother of all phablets) that has a touch screen and stylus input. samsung may have popularized android phablet, but they are not the one who invented or the first to make a device for productivty.
And lets talk about “mini”
the first Galaxy mini is announced january 2011 VS Xperia X10 mini february 2010
60. VZWuser76 (Posts: 896; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)
Well then I guess everyone is copying Motorola (first cell phone) then. And in case you didn't remember, the Dell streak was a major flop, it sold about as well as the BB Playbook. So why wouldn't another company try and take a concept that was poorly executed and see if they can't make it work, which judging by their sales they have done.
Lastly, calling out companies for copying is ridiculous, unless their product is an exact clone of the original. The whole point of competition is to offer a similar device that improves upon the original. If you're going to call out Samsung for copying, then you'd have to call all but the first company to offer: cars, computers, TVs, cola drinks, stereos, microwaves, and the list goes on and on. Basically any product made by more than one company.
61. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1123; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
You must be very stupid, please read jason and all my comment!
corectly after that stop saying some BS!
it’s seems the heat from exynos har damage your brain or you just mindless and closed minded fanboy
63. VZWuser76 (Posts: 896; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)
Don't have an exynos and am not really loyal to any company. What I said however was true. Motorola was the first in cell phones, and the Dell Streak was a flop, sorry.
When all of you people wail about "copying" you sound like a 5 year old on the playground complaining to the teacher. Copying to an extent is a fact of business. Let's take the auto industry for example. Components like air conditioning, anti lock brakes, power locks and windows, and power steering all work essentially the same. So that means that one company put them in their cars, and others copied them.
What I'd like to know is why are you people so angry about it? Do you work for someone that Samsung copied from? What stake do you have in this? The thing is we know none of what's happeining except what we read in the news. Perhaps they did copy Dell, maybe they were planning something like the Note that far back and halted it when the Streak tanked. You don't know, and I don't know. Why get so worked up about this?
65. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1123; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
Damn.... why are you so stupid
PLEASE READ ALL MY COMMENT!!!
can you find something about COPYING?
please stop being a clueless, mindless, and closed minded fanboy!!!
33. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1123; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
And if i’m not wrong Dell Streak 5 is the first android phablet
44. Jason2k13 (Posts: 470; Member since: 28 Mar 2013)
so are you saying we should start talking about who invented what now? Because we might aswell talk about motorola and talk about history again and that every phone should not be made because they are all copy cats which is boring, now lets talk about who popularized 'what' first shall well?
Wasn't my point in the first place was for people to not worry who copies who because its the costumer who wins it all.
51. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1123; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
maybe you should check what you said in comment # 13, especially this sentence.
"Haven't you noticed that ever since Samsung made phablets, every other company is doing it to? Samsung also made samsung minis of their flagship phones, and now other companies are doing it to?"
because what you say in that sentence, is a mistake and a big lie.
What actually happened was ....
since Dell made the first android phablet, samsung and other companies trying to make a better phablet.
as well as with the "mini".
"if I'm not mistaken" since Sony (SE) made the first mini android flagship, samsung and other companies trying to do the same.
I'm sure if you were not closed minded and mindless fanboy you will be able to admit your mistakes, and stop saying nonsense.
64. VZWuser76 (Posts: 896; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)
Ok, I am reading yours and Jason's comments again, and you know what, he's right. When talking about the phablets, he never said they invented them, only that since Samsung started making them others have jumped on the bandwagon. Besides Dell, who was making phablets until the Note came out? The Streak tanked and Samsung picked up the ball and ran with it.
As far as the mini versions of phones, again he did not say Samsung invented them either, only that after they started making mini versions of their flagships that others are following suit, which is true.
Now go ahead, respond and call me stupid and a fanboys, etc, etc. Apparently you can't have a conversation without name calling and antagonizing. I don't know everything, but I know that. Maybe you should realize that as well, you might learn something new.
66. yudi.nemesis (Posts: 1123; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)
Let me tell why you so stupid because you just like other clueless samsung fanboy always OFF TOPIC,
Jason says “EVER SINCE SAMSUNG MADE PHABLET EVERY OTHER COMPANY DOING IT TO”
i just prove it that everything what he have said is “wrong”
Cuz Dell is the one who make the first android phablet and since then every other company like acer, samsung, pantech,and LG start/follow to made android phablet, and go to wikipedia if you want to know more about phablet.
also the same situation is happen with mini’s.
if i’m not wrong ever since Sony(SE) made mini android flagship samsung and other company doing it to.
i just prove it that everything jason have said about EVER SINCE is totaly wrong,
if you want reply my comment please stay on topic!!!
67. McLTE (Posts: 612; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
I'm not normally one to stoop to the level of name calling and being insulting.. but WOW..
Yudi, you have got to be one of the most narrow minded and blatantly STUPID people that I have ever encountered on these forums.
It's been explained to you several times what Jason was trying to say - that since Samsung started making the Phablets and flagship minis, other manufacturers have jumped onboard.
What is so F-n hard to understand about that statement? You argue that Jason is saying Samsung invented the mini or phablet. NO, he never said that.
Samsung made the phablet and mini POPULAR. They were NOT first to do it.
Samsung took a chance and SUCCEEDED where Dell failed with the phablet. Can you dispute that FACT? No, you can't. Because of Samsung's success, other manufactures have been scrambling to get in on Samsung's success. NOT A DIFFICULT CONCEPT to grasp Yudi.
Same deal with the Mini.
Quit calling people Stupid Yudi, because you are the one coming across as a total moron with ZERO ability to comprehend what you are reading.
36. tashreef (Posts: 475; Member since: 24 Nov 2012)
it's not big deal if copysung copy's other.because they don't have anything original to offer... but seeking patent on others idea is ridiculus...
39. SonyFindOneDroidple (Posts: 441; Member since: 11 May 2013)
Neither phonearena nor Androidauthority nor Gsmarena nor anyone can interpret or Knows what similarities and differences this patent in connection with Asus..if this really punch a very the same approach as what Asus is doing then all of you can continue talking BS abt "copysung"
53. Napalm_3nema (Posts: 571; Member since: 14 Jun 2013)
Samsung was a blatant copycat of Apple (Modern smartphone), then Dell ("phablet"), now ASUS ("pad/phone" hybrid). Those aren't the only categories, but they are most relevant here. Stop defending them as if they aren't blatant ripoff artists.
24. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 5472; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
What bout apple sue Samsung? And why they deserve NFC patent when it's been out in the market for 2 yrs?
28. ajac09 (Posts: 1167; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)
yet I bet if this was apple you would way its "innoative" like there orginal iphone design and ipads which were copies of samsung and other devices..
57. willard12 (Posts: 489; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
Ummm, if Samsung has the patent how can Asus sue? This is out of the Apple playbook of COPYING things like slide to unlock and pinch to zoom. The only difference is Samsung has yet to sue over it. Maybe since Apple iOS 7 has COPIED toggles, notifications, you simply refer to them as a great artist.
2. pwnarena (Posts: 580; Member since: 15 Feb 2013)
the revised patent law grants the rights to the first to file for the patent, not for the one who made an earlier art/product. sadly, samsung may not be sued even if asus did it first if asus did not file for the patent. samsung may even be the one to stop asus from selling a product they originally conceptualized.
4. Topcat488 (Posts: 977; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
That would be sad, but a bit funny also. I guess the Law is the law, in this dog eat dog world. Asus, must be steaming about this for sure. Hehehehehahaha.
5. xperiaDROID (Posts: 4666; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Asus don't even need to steam about this. Yes, Asus did not file for the patent, but they were still the first to make this product, this is innovation.
54. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 5472; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
Patent system is out of control for BOTH APPLE/SAMSUNG.
3. FlushGordon (unregistered)
One more reason to hate the USPTO.
6. nobelset (Posts: 260; Member since: 17 Oct 2012)
Does anyone here actually read the article before commenting? Yeah, if you could, that would be great.
9. abcdefgh (banned) (Posts: 471; Member since: 29 Mar 2013)
^this is what you comment when.you are newbie at PA
19. nobelset (Posts: 260; Member since: 17 Oct 2012)
Dude I've been here for quite a while now. I think I am qualified to say my previous statement
68. ncarlosmiguel (Posts: 200; Member since: 14 May 2013)
I think he means you should be used to people at PA commenting without reading or comprehending the article first or you should be used to people incapable of comprehension at all.
20. nobelset (Posts: 260; Member since: 17 Oct 2012)
Dude I've been here for quite a while now. I think I am qualified to say my previous statement
7. spiderpig2894 (Posts: 367; Member since: 10 Jan 2012)
They do copy unfortunately. They even once said that the Samsung Galaxy should look like an iPhone to sell more and counter iPhone.
11. hung2900 (Posts: 683; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)
Stupid trick for misleading from Apple.
The comperison only said what was the better thing and why better on iPhone comparing to Galaxy S2, without any conclusion of copying or not (actually Apple cut this part intensionally, that J.K.S said cleary because of the loss against iPhone, they needed to make different to compete)
12. spiderpig2894 (Posts: 367; Member since: 10 Jan 2012)
It wasn't about the S2. They referred to the first Galaxy
27. hung2900 (Posts: 683; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)
OK Galaxy S, maybe my typo. The story is the same. Do not distort the truth by stupid statements from haters.
41. spiderpig2894 (Posts: 367; Member since: 10 Jan 2012)
Not really from the haters i guess 'cause I read it on the PA news in the patent war era.
15. poping (unregistered)
people who hates Samsung:
1. the competitors
2. the competitors' shareholders
3. the competitors' fanboys
4. people who were paid by the competitors to make a hate comments
5. people who think it's a fad
6. people who just hate everything and everybody
but these peeps have one more thing common, they are all "closet galaxy users"
17. jo_Ny (Posts: 24; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)
LMAO Smasung is the one that was ACTUALLY caught paying people to trash competitors. Get your facts straight
34. poping (unregistered)
why would samsung need to do that? just look at the competitor's sales for crying out loud.. even their own fanboys cant save them...
42. jo_Ny (Posts: 24; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)
Why? Isn't that obvious? To eliminate the competition, especially in Taiwan (home of HTC) and in Japan (home of Sony). But thats not the point. The point is that Samsung WAS CAUGHT and Samsung even ADMITED. Just search for "samsung admits paying students fake reviews" and you'll see. Samung is now the worst enemy of the Android ecosystem and of all us consumers.
48. poping (unregistered)
sorry, but i really don't see your point. why would samsung want to eliminate something that is already eliminating itself?
62. jo_Ny (Posts: 24; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)
Are you that dumb or just another samsung troll? Who do you think it's the leader in sales inTaiwan and Japan?? HTC and Sony respectively.
69. poping (unregistered)
sooo you are an htc or a sony fanboy!!!! at least we narrowed that down to 2...
well good luck to your htc and sony...
is taiwan and japan the best they can do? hahaha...
58. willard12 (Posts: 489; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
Apple just get caught strong-arming publishers to eliminate competition and fix (raise) prices in a court of law. So, who is the enemy of consumers? Get your facts straight.
16. jo_Ny (Posts: 24; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)
LMAO nothing new here, same good old Samsung. Samsung why do you copy? Because we can!
22. Rehankhan (Posts: 323; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)
this copy thingy is getting lame every company do copy without copy there would be no innovation
29. ajac09 (Posts: 1167; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)
EVERY company copies some just do it so well you forget about the orginals