Samsung Galaxy S5 vs LG G2: first look
Interface and functionality
Processor and memory
Samsung Galaxy S5 vs LG G2
3. akki20892 (Posts: 3655; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
Of course G2 looks great vs s5. Photos are telling us.
15. jcdz89 (Posts: 78; Member since: 01 Mar 2013)
G2 is not a good looking phone but when comparing with that ugly s5 it's pretty good.
54. LGisgood (Posts: 471; Member since: 23 Jun 2012)
G2 is sexy good looking phone.
won best innovative design award @2014 CES!
44. youlookfoolish (Posts: 131; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)
It's subjective. I agree with you however. The S5 honestly doesn't stand out from the S4 in my eyes. The G2 is thinner on bezel and sharper without the dumb perforated style back plate.
2. Tizen007 (Posts: 522; Member since: 07 Jan 2014)
LG, show Sammy what real plastic awesomeness is. Please teach them how to use plastic on their phones.
53. LGisgood (Posts: 471; Member since: 23 Jun 2012)
LG has already PROVEN IN BEST DESIGN AWARDS!
see Reddot design awards and iF design award for LG Mobile!
4. tech-head (Posts: 132; Member since: 02 Sep 2011)
Glad I didn't wait for the S5. I'm happy with my LG G2.
37. steedsofwar (Posts: 288; Member since: 07 Oct 2013)
I'm feeling exactly the same. This only leaves HTC to announce their contender. I'm not holding my breath if I'm honest. I have a feeling that I'm gonna incline towards the next nexus. Purely for software reasons. I'm already running AOSP 4.4 Kitkat on my G" and blown away by the responsiveness and smoothness. The G2 has an awesome battery and camera. I hope the next Nexus will do the same.
45. youlookfoolish (Posts: 131; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)
Here here. Nothing about the S5 will make me put my G2 down. The health features and water proofing make me feel like it's the S4 active update.
6. Napalm_3nema (Posts: 1275; Member since: 14 Jun 2013)
"Samsung, you have really outdone yourself in 2014," said nobody ever.
8. Edward_bly (Posts: 207; Member since: 11 Dec 2013)
+1 I just wish they hadnt have used that back design.
46. youlookfoolish (Posts: 131; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)
Samsung is falling into a similar "refinement" cycle like Apple. But many consumers will still eat it up on name brand only. That's just the way it is.
7. Reeyawn (Posts: 65; Member since: 21 Apr 2013)
The real rival of the s5 is not the G2 but the G3. Wait till the G3 arrives.
11. downphoenix (Posts: 2416; Member since: 19 Jun 2010)
I will love to see how the G3 goes, considering how anemic of an upgrade the S5 is over the G2 (And in some regards, it is a downgrade from it). Also interested to see how the new HTC phone goes, it may actually be better than Samsung's this year.
39. erod550 (Posts: 2; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)
Battery, larger size despite a smaller screen.
26. R-vjn (Posts: 165; Member since: 07 Jan 2013)
thats right, but we can't deny the fact that the G2, last years LG flagship, stands its own against S5, Samsung's this years flag-boat.. :D
47. youlookfoolish (Posts: 131; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)
Hard to compared a 2014 model to a 2013 model for sure. It's impossible to speculate what the G3 will actually be from a hardware stand point. But with that said, LG has a track record of over specing their phones.
I simply hope they stop trying to throw too much software at the end user and make it leaner and meaner.
10. maherk (Posts: 1221; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
Snapdragon 801 vs 800, 16mp vs 13mp, fingerprint scanner and heart rate monitor vs none, ip67 certificate vs none, fastest download speeds and fastest camera on a phone vs nottt, plastic yet premium phone(not my words, almost every reviewer's words) vs shiny plastic( the same one you thought you hated on the S4), touchwiz vs cheap copy of the touchwiz. YETTT, you pick the G2 over the S5. This what I can call a blind sheep. Choosing Z2, the Next One, or the coming G3 would definitely sound reasonable, but picking up a 6 months old G2 over this shows how much butthurt you trolls are.
LIKE IT OR NOT, majority of the reviews are giving props for everything Samsung did(except for the memory) and there is nothing you can change about it.
13. downphoenix (Posts: 2416; Member since: 19 Jun 2010)
G2 is also significantly cheaper, has a better quality screen and slightly larger, is a smaller device, has optical image stabilization, and has 16gb of more memory built it as well as 200 extra mah on the better. The S5 isn't clearly better like you would say.
14. maherk (Posts: 1221; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
Cheaper? Maybe because it is 6 months old, maybe?
Better quality screen? Last time I checked the Note 3 had the best Screen in the android market according to Display Mate, and Samsung has implemented the same technology in the S5.
Both have image stabilization, still I feel sorry for you for jumping all the improvements the S5 has in the camera department to focus on this matter.
16 gb more? The S5 is coming in both flavors, 16 amd 32 gb, and guess what, for another 12$ you can pick any 16 gb sd card and call it a day, something your precious G2 can't.
200 extra mah doesn't mean it's much better, the z1 has an average battery life despite having a 3000 mah. Its all about optimization, and Samsung has done a great job in the Note 3 and am sure they ll use that to their own benefit in the S5.
fyi, a used G2 is sold on Craigslist for as much as the 5 months older used S4 is selling for, and sometimes even for less. Just shows how much people are "loving" the S4 knock off aka the G2.
40. erod550 (Posts: 2; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)
S4 knock off? Your fanboy is showing. There are quite a few differences. The S4 is a great phone, but the G2 is as well and is certainly not a knock off, with innovative features like knock on (heh) and the button positioning, allowing for a thinner bezel on the sides. Samsung isn't the only company with innovations you know.
34. maherk (Posts: 1221; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
A fanboy wouldn't have bought the Lg 2x, Lg 4x, Lg G2, Sony Xperia S, Sony Xperia Arc S, Motorola Razr, iPhone 2g, iPhone 3gs, iPhone 4s, and Nokia N8. I am a tech fanatic, I always try to go get the best, and when I don't get what I paid for I speak out my mind. Samsung isn't perfect, but they are the closest to paying me my money back with the offerings I get from their phones. I have the Note 3, I won't upgrade to the S5 because I don't see the need to it, but if I still had an S4, I wouldn't think about upgrading it twice.
17. Topcat488 (Posts: 1173; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
Even if the S5 is waterproof, that half year old LG G2 Looks better than the S5, IMO even with the glossy plastic shine. And Samsung must be "NUTS" to only put 16GB with only 8GB free. SamApple will just have to learn the hard way, when people leave this device on the shelf. Everybody knows by now not to buy the 1st variant anyway, but wait for the Snapdragon 805 edition to come, next month. XD
18. E.S.1 (Posts: 294; Member since: 14 Sep 2013)
Same boring Samsung... I'm glad I switched to G2 and didn't wait for this thing.
48. youlookfoolish (Posts: 131; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)
Same old s***!
Couldn't have said it better. +1
19. Jishnusur (Posts: 73; Member since: 07 Oct 2013)
Don't insult the G2 comparing to this this piece of junk. I wouldn't take one for free. That would hurt my Ego! :P
20. egbtmagus (Posts: 58; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)
HAHA What a BS comparison, The S5 has a magical aura surrounding it? Are you kidding me? You really want us to take PA seriously with crap like that? Why not just come out and say you guys are loyal to Samsung with a line like that.
49. youlookfoolish (Posts: 131; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)
Magical aura had me scoffing too.
This site has a click bait writing style in many ways. They posted T-Mobile's 4Q results without mentioning T-Mobile lost $20 million. Then in response to comment, they simply claimed they posted from the source of T-Mobile.
Every other credible site put T-Mobile's loss in the HEADLINE of their article. Then we read "aura" when describing a product that actually has very little discernible difference from it's predecessor in overall style outside of a back plate.
Maybe they will re-write the S4 review and give it an "aura".
21. Professor (Posts: 192; Member since: 02 Aug 2013)
I suppose this "comparizon" was made by a Samsung employee because it way too bias...
22. jeff1434325 (Posts: 95; Member since: 07 Aug 2012)
is it just me or the S5 really disappoints us....big time!
50. youlookfoolish (Posts: 131; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)
It's not just you. Almost every survey I've participated in has an end result of 70-80% of respondents claiming they aren't impressed or will be going with another manufacturer or model.
24. XaErO (Posts: 184; Member since: 25 Sep 2012)
Hi Nick .. Hands on videos by you are always well explained !!
27. AJIT1985 (Posts: 2; Member since: 25 Feb 2014)
there is no doubt that G2 looking much better than this in terms of looks and design finishing.and S5 HAVE SOME new features cause its new phone here, but its looking like boring old design......and i think LG hv made a little mistake here by launching G PRO 2 here instaed og G3.....G3 COULD BECOME A STRONG COMPETETOR AGAINST S5..........
28. RadKrish (Posts: 17; Member since: 28 Nov 2013)
G2 is already beaten S5 i think. S5 wont even come near to G3..
30. ausnote2 (Posts: 84; Member since: 07 Dec 2012)
how can lg g2 beat galaxy s5 when g2 compromises on
-no sd card
-non removable battery
-subjective but the on screen button reduce the screen estate and lacks feedback
i definitely give credit for the thin side bezel though, but g2 is close but no cigar
32. gabrielvoica (Posts: 59; Member since: 05 Mar 2013)
wow...what a biassed article!
who wrote this thing!?the Ceo of samsung!?
perhaps :wow,Samsung ,you did it again!you managed to surprise everyone with yet another amazing cheap plastic full of bloatware,highly overpriced product!!
waterproof!? does anyone remember the s4 Active!?
as the phone wasn't ugly enough,they had to make the UI even uglier...just look at the colours and the so called "flattened" icons,the notification center and so on...
used samsung,since the s4 i left that boat and won't come back anytime soon..
33. Nabil2511 (Posts: 149; Member since: 27 Jan 2014)
those dots on the back of S5 is fuuuggllyyy.. Samsung failed badly this time..
35. Nabil2511 (Posts: 149; Member since: 27 Jan 2014)
"No fingerprint scanner is available on the LG G2. What is to be made available after a software update, however, is LG's KnockCode feature. It is used as an unlock pattern that consists of up to 8 taps." is this trueeee?? G2's getting the KnockCode feature??
36. mike2959 (Posts: 279; Member since: 08 Oct 2011)
I went from a Galaxy 4 to a G2, and just got the 4.4 update on the G2 yesterday. The G2 is unbelievable phone, the battery life is killer, the display, the size. ..I'm gonna stick with LG and hold off for the G3.
38. Bukatorade (Posts: 22; Member since: 23 Jan 2014)
I have a G2 and after seeing that menial upgrade from Samsung, I might skip the G3 and go right to the G4 for my next upgrade. No need to rush things here obviously.
41. iTechies (Posts: 81; Member since: 28 Dec 2013)
you know what guys?? i admit that G2 has a better looks and design than the SGS5 all day which can attract more consumers, but in perfomance dont EVER say that G2 still wins against the S5! are blind?? s5 has too many higher and better specs than that of G2! even note 3 is enough to kick that G2's ass!! anyways, i had too many complains of that f*cking ugly LG phones!!! in which i had worst experiences on my previous LG devices such as the optimus G and the G pro! these both devices disappoints me and give me a lot! and i know that f*cking G2 would be the same!!! the only thing good on those LG phones is the battery that lasts long than samsung devices and others i think. but thats it! you lost my trust LG!
42. ipred (Posts: 1; Member since: 02 Mar 2014)
Samsung has done nothing this year.
1) The bezels of the phone remained the same.
2) The RAM remained the same.
3) The design became more ugly. What an awful back cover.
4) I think that nobody under 60 years old cares about measuring his heartbeat with a smartphone. This is ridiculous.
On the other hand , LG :
1) Minimized the bezels in an amazing way. This is innovation!
2) Put the hard keys back which is more convenient.
3) Provided an excellent battery life.
4) Gave us 3GB of Ram.
5) Offered us the double tap option.
6) Always giving us the best roms with no lags.
The author of Phone Arena is trying desperately to tell us that S5 is something new.No it is not. It's a bigger in size S4 with uglier back cover. People who gonna buy it are identical to those who buy iphone because Apple told them that the human finger cannot handle easily larger screens...
43. tehalley (Posts: 13; Member since: 03 Jul 2012)
Am happy with my LG G2, not worth the cost for as I see a minor upgrade. Just don't like how slow the G2 camera focus is, my G3 was much faster to focus. Think I'll wait another year to upgrade. No real advantage right now!
51. youlookfoolish (Posts: 131; Member since: 14 Dec 2012)
It's hard to innovate.
Apple and Samsung are honestly in a pattern of refinement. And it's hard to simply revolutionize. The vast majority or people who will end up buying an S5 will likely not give a single damn about its new health features.
People buy on brand and this phone will sell in the 10s of millions no matter how much techies are disappointed it is not over speced. To this day people tell me with conviction the next iPhone will have a holographic keyboard, or a 3d camera, or a larger 4k display. And all I can do is shake my head. It's pointless to argue or get angry.
Phones are made for a mass market and this name brand will sell plenty well to the mass market. All of the window dressing makes little difference.
56. fsckmyharddisk (Posts: 1; Member since: 04 May 2014)
I disagree with quite a few points in this review, such as not describing the softened in the display technologies used when it's a very valid and important aspect of any mobile device. OLED displays are terribly power hungry when displaying anything but black which makes them a fairly poor choice in terms of battery life. If this were a discussion about televisions, I'd say that OLED is the way to go because of being able to view it at any angle without picture degradation and lower power consumption overall because the parts of the display showing black are turned off completely. But this isn't about televisions, it's about phones. The viewing angle is almost always straight on, the display doesn't spend as much time on as a TV does (check your battery stats. Most people have less than 50% screen on time) and a TV isn't still useful powered on bbut with the display off.
IPS LCD displays offer a great balance between power and visual quality. The backlighting being more powerful means perfect viewing in any lighting, the colors are far more accurate and vibrant, with only black being crushed and washed out. I don't know about you, but the majority of my time with my display on is spent with black only being displayed as a text color on brighter backgrounds. OLED will eat your battery alive, whereas LCD is far more balanced and consistent.
And let's get into the micro SD slot..."The [LG G2] lacks one, which means that there's no way of augmenting its on-board storage capacity."
This is absolutely false. The Korean model has a slot, and all of the other models have USB OTG capabilities enabled at the kernel level right out of the box. I, myself, took a thin plastic case, a USB otg cable, and a USB card reader, gutted the reader and the cable, soldered them together, and used a dremel tool to remove a few layers of plastic from the snap on case to embed the reader and cable internal parts and built a case that adds minimal bulk to the phone while enabling it to have a microSD slot. $13 in materials and ten minutes of work. That's just if you want it to look professional. You could just duct tape an otg cable to a case so all USB peripheral devices are on the back of the phone and plug in anything from USB sticks to keyboard and mouse combos (my favorite is an easel/kickstand case I modified with anther otg cable to plug in my xbox360 controller to play games comfortably.)
I guess my point is that this review doesn't seem objective at all. It feels like it's meant to build up a brand new Samsung phone against the LG flagship that's about to be replaced by its next iteration, via giving wrong information or the ignoring other options entirely.
I'll be more than happy to eat my words if there's a G3 vs SGS5 review if the G3 really makes it to market before the 6 month mark.