(Posts: 54; Member since: 27 May 2010)
Looks to be absolutely fake. Where did it come from? Why aren't there other pictures? If a picture of the screen is captured, why not the device? I could do a better photo shop job showing android 5.0 aka Cookie Dough
(Posts: 328; Member since: 08 Jan 2010)
I agree, fake.
How would you have an "unknown" baseband, isn't the point of listing it for development purposes? I'd also imagine the build number would have a number or indicator of some sort.
(Posts: 61; Member since: 11 Oct 2009)
Who cares? We all know Gingerbread is coming...
its real. i broke into the motorola offices, rpundhouse kicked the security guard and stole the skimatics. i then fornicated with steve jobs mother, beat my chest like a gorilla, and got an iphone 4 that is shatter proof and i can hold anyway i friggin want.
i am chuck norris
Chuck Norris (unregistered)
Also roundhouse is now spelled rpundhouse.
Condoleezza Rice (unregistered)
Condoleezza Rice is never wrong.
(Posts: 12; Member since: 13 Apr 2009)
If it's a Motorola, you know it's going to be running that ugly Motorola Application Platform, not stock. Also, those screenshots don't look any different than 2.1 (icons, widgets, etc).