- AnTuTu: 133,054
- Vellamo Metal: 3,500
- Vellamo Browser: 4,925
LG G5 shakes hands with Snapdragon 820 to shatter AnTuTu records: benchmark test scores
1. Wiencon (Posts: 1870; Member since: 06 Aug 2014)
I couldn't care less about benchmarks but just want to say that this is the winner for me. S7 didn't surprise me with anything although waterproofing is always awesome, but overall I feel that G5 is better device
26. Piyath_ale (Posts: 79; Member since: 02 Nov 2015)
This antutu is really confusing for me. Is it V6.0.1? Couple of weeks ago iPhone 6s was said to score some 133000 ish points. What the heck? Plz some one clearly put up Geekbench 3 results for single and multi score..
51. DarkVader777 (Posts: 50; Member since: 10 Feb 2016)
This is just pre tesring. Wait until mid march. You will see after tweak test scores.
27. s.kumaran (Posts: 25; Member since: 18 Feb 2016)
Hello, Phone arena. Where is the S7 Edge benchmark score? Fraud media..
52. DarkVader777 (Posts: 50; Member since: 10 Feb 2016)
This just old website hit pitch tactic. Get everyone talking how Sam behind. Lg so great and iphone right there still. Mid march Sam should do what we call a BustOut. They will go on ahead after final tweaking. Lg had to throw all in right now. But just wait it will change
30. Arch_Fiend (Posts: 2461; Member since: 03 Oct 2015)
50 points higher than my 6s plus, no big deal.
40. Arch_Fiend (Posts: 2461; Member since: 03 Oct 2015)
Sorry but Pa does not have updated scores. Here's my iPhone 6s plus antutu score.https://plus.google.com/u/0/11
4188354242437759670/posts/5fTR XX2iLgg?pid=625400364011784824 2&oid=114188354242437759670
Like I said only 50 points lower than the G5
42. AlikMalix (Posts: 5829; Member since: 16 Jul 2014)
My 6s on average hits double than what's posted above for 6s... Am I using a different Antutu app?
41. Tsepz_GP (Posts: 987; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)
You're prepared to take a smaller battery over a larger battery + water proofing all due to an AnTuTu score? I've now officially read it all here at PA! :'D
54. h1a82001 (Posts: 2; Member since: 06 Mar 2014)
G5 have wide angle camera which is essential for me taking video of my chess games. Plus the audio module might be something since I'm a audiophile (own thousands of dollars worth of headphones and equipment). Price of g5 and phone buff speed test is what I'm going to decide from. I hope g5 is significantly cheaper, otherwise I'm going with the year of free Netflix
2. Pattyface (Posts: 1612; Member since: 20 Aug 2014)
Wow! That is much higher than I expected.. Im still not convinced that we notice the difference between last year's phones and this year's with regards to flagship speeds
5. kiza_88 (Posts: 21; Member since: 28 Feb 2013)
not bad at all but my bigest concern is battery life i have g4 and battery life is not pretty...
14. Pattyface (Posts: 1612; Member since: 20 Aug 2014)
The 808 wasn't known to be good to batteries but I'm thinking this 820 will be better
21. sgodsell (Posts: 3623; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)
The G4 had DDR3-933 ram and the G5 has DDR4-1600 ram. Which is 40% more power efficient then the DDR3 ram.
24. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10456; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Check again. PA's scores are lower than other sites. 130,000+ is what I've been seeing so idk what the hell they did.
8. sceamgid (Posts: 24; Member since: 12 Nov 2015)
i just saw a video exynos 8890 high cores @2,6 ghz and made 130k @antutu, arent they supposed to be 2,3 ghz , samsung cheats again???
12. sceamgid (Posts: 24; Member since: 12 Nov 2015)
16. joeytaylor (Posts: 443; Member since: 28 Feb 2015)
Damn...have that thing screaming...not sure if the finished product will run that fast...but bein internally cooled ...maybe
34. prith (Posts: 7; Member since: 27 Sep 2015)
iPhone 6s scores 135k in Antutu.. yet they put wrong numbers like 54k.. I don't think they bias Apple..
18. bodzio1809 (Posts: 356; Member since: 28 Aug 2013)
Antutu is most broken benchmark. Look at better benchmarks like GeekBench.
22. sgodsell (Posts: 3623; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)
Geekbench is for iPhones. Anything else is better than Geekbench. It sucks.
23. bodzio1809 (Posts: 356; Member since: 28 Aug 2013)
So tell me about good benchmarks. I will know in future :-) I know that Antutu is bad and I was thinking that Geekbench is ok.
32. may_czos (Posts: 736; Member since: 22 Nov 2014)
Geekbench tests CPU core speed only. No GPU, no RAM speed, no UI rendering etc.
45. bodzio1809 (Posts: 356; Member since: 28 Aug 2013)
Yes. So there is more reliable benchmark than Atutu with this tests?
37. ibend (Posts: 4573; Member since: 30 Sep 2014)
and they can just chill it with glass of cold water whenever it got overheat
49. HomerS (Posts: 187; Member since: 19 Sep 2014)
Samsung stopped cheating after Note 3 but LG and HTC continued to cheat and likely still are.
50. HomerS (Posts: 187; Member since: 19 Sep 2014)
And Samsung doesnt cheat, the Exynos 8890 can go up to 2,6Ghz when only 1-2 cores are in use, otherwise 2,3Ghz, check the Anandtech site
15. Leandronb (Posts: 86; Member since: 03 Jun 2014)
Is this galaxy s7 score using the exynos variant?
29. Arch_Fiend (Posts: 2461; Member since: 03 Oct 2015)
My 6s plus scored higher than that before, come this isn't record breaking.
39. Norris (Posts: 121; Member since: 26 Jun 2015)
Alright we get it.Now stop posting it again and again!!
31. baldilocks (Posts: 743; Member since: 14 Dec 2008)
PhoneArena has NEVER been able to get benchmarking numbers right. I've been here since 2008 and it hasn't gotten any better.
33. BobbyDigital (Posts: 1926; Member since: 29 May 2014)
LG could literally score 1 million on the benchmarks and people would still complain about them. Smh...
Kudos to LG!
35. prith (Posts: 7; Member since: 27 Sep 2015)
6S score more than 135K.. P@thetic B$ Art!cle...
43. AlikMalix (Posts: 5829; Member since: 16 Jul 2014)
Mine a little less than that, but yes, what's with 54K number?
36. roscuthiii (Posts: 2217; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)
Curiosity... This is an LG G5 article, correct Victor H./PA???
So, why are GFXBench scores shown here of which LG G5 is not shown to be a part of? Was it not a part of the tests? Did it not score in the top 3? Or, can PhoneArena simply not have an article about a phone doing well at something without also including an iPhone showcase?
44. sunnyfpy (Posts: 89; Member since: 12 May 2013)
Haha,do you own a phone just to look at Antutu scores? All this write up reliable? From whose persecptive?
46. Droids-R-us (Posts: 33; Member since: 17 Sep 2012)
The results above are not very helpful because they should be stating Single core, Multi core and On screen performance for each phone in separated sections, the results above are very random and non-descriptive. PA also need to include every phone in each section for comparison. To be fair though PA did say they were preliminary results, I do still feel, in this form, these are pretty much useless figures.
47. Sondae (Posts: 279; Member since: 02 Jan 2013)
Good score but this is just a prototype not the actual that will be sold yet. There will be a lot of changes when the actual will come says lg on androidauth. I cant wait for the real thing.
48. dilpal (Posts: 1; Member since: 22 Feb 2016)
Phonr Arena has posted the benchmark score for LG G5 and galaxy S7 using Antutu v6, while for note 5 and rest of old devices it is posting score with Antutu v5. There is huge difference between these two version in reporting their score.
55. trix4rix (Posts: 1; Member since: 21 Mar 2016)
I don't think any of these iphone users realize that antutu doesn't take into account your screen resolution, so both the GS7 and the LG G5 have 1440p screens while the iphone's have 1334x750 for the regular and 1080p for the plus. This would drastically change if either phones had the same resolution as the Android flagship counterparts. Your iphone wouldn't top 80k with a 2k screen, while either of these 820 machines could top 150k easily with a 1080p screen instead.
Seems like the performance gains the Samsung has over the LG G5 can be boiled down to the cooling system the GS7 has. The G5 is passively cooled, which obviously limits performance slightly.