Google could be subsidizing almost $400 of the Nexus 4 cost
1. darkskoliro (Posts: 997; Member since: 07 May 2012)
16gb for $249, AWESOME!
Change the typo.
12. MeoCao (unregistered)
I don't think there is any subsidizing, no 1 can afford that big subsidization.
Google simply does not make profits from selling the phone and they can save by eliminating sales agents, but it's great value nevertherless.
Too bad in my country there's no Google play :(
16. goodvalue (Posts: 3; Member since: 06 Nov 2012)
Google were REVOLUTIONIZING the phone industry.
Think about this,
in apple world, apple doesn't compete with anyone, because apple user or the is*** will buy any apple product, so, they slowly change the spec, and milking their success as long as they could.
In order to change the world order, google did the dramatic change.. GOOGLE say, FROM NOW ON, the 16GB with quad core and 8MB is $249, and with 16GB is $300.
With this new GUIDELINE from google, the manufacture surrounding the android ecosystem can't stand still the apple way, and must move at a faster pace.
That's mean, in high end... if samsung & LG want to sell the US$ 600-700 phone, they should probably have 64GB + ext storage, or maybe 128GB + ext storage. and also better camera, better battery, etc.
and this also will shake the low end.
right now dual core android with less than 1280x720 were selling around $300, that's mean the android manufacture have to re-adjust their standard.
all in all,
I love google for doing this.
if google got lazy with spec, they will become the next nokia, great OS (symbian) with underpower hardware (Arm 11 680MHz for N8/E7/C7???)
21. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 4167; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
Once again apple doesn't have a gun pointed to anyone's head forcing them to buy their products. Don't buy it if you don't like it.
31. rusticguy (Posts: 2828; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)
Same like Drug Peddler's don;t have it pointed at anyone's head .. :)
32. metalpoet (unregistered)
meocao what country do you live in?
2. MoToMoTo (Posts: 4; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)
On the third paragraph "Optimus actually has 32GB of RAM"
3. XPERIA-KNIGHT (unregistered)
LOL would be amazing now wouldnt it........Great Article Michael :)
5. AliNSiddiqui (Posts: 382; Member since: 19 Sep 2012)
I don't think it would make any difference with today's apps on Android though :)
6. XPERIA-KNIGHT (unregistered)
yea it would most definitely be unnecessary.....lol
4. Dr.Phil (Posts: 931; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
Well, the international price rumor is just a rumor for right now. As far as T-Mobile is concerned, do we know if the carrier branding is going to be on the device or not? I mean when you buy an unlocked phone, say through AT&T, you are getting the carrier's boxing, branding, and all of that stuff that costs the carrier money to put on it. So, the price is normally higher than if you bought an unlocked international device because of those reasons and because the carrier wants to make a profit for itself.
Here is what we do know: LG and Google worked together to make this product. I do think it probably costs LG around $250 to build the product. Google is taking a small profit margin on the device itself, but it's using funds from the other products it offers to do that.
24. philyew (Posts: 3; Member since: 06 Nov 2012)
It's more than a rumor about the pricing overseas. Retailers in Spain, Austria and elsewhere are complaining about the uncompetitive MSRP that LG are setting in comparison with the Google Play store pricing.
If everyone is getting their device from LG rather than Google, then the difference in pricing is explained.
Since the Nexus 4 gets LG inside the Android development phone eco-system, Google are doubtless getting a special price from LG for the device, but we know from other reliable sources that the manufacturers generally charge a lot more to the carriers for top-end devices.
For example, the documents released through the Apple v. Samsung law suit showed that the first generation Galaxy S devices had a wholesale price of around $430 and the Galaxy SII cost them around $450. Who is realistically going to expect the Nexus 4 to come to the carriers with a wholesale price any less than that?
7. cheeseaddict (Posts: 49; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)
i think the writer of this article is drunk. way to go mate!
8. Retro-touch (Posts: 264; Member since: 24 Oct 2011)
They should sell the device at 299 and 349 Euros its already a marked-up price cause the euro has more value, but I suspect the price increase might be an attempt by LG to help sell its Optimus G, cause it can't compete with Nexus 4 if the pricing is as competitive as it is
9. Bozzor (Posts: 145; Member since: 02 May 2012)
The pricing policy of the Nexus 4 is definitely causing headaches for carriers around the world. How do you treat a handset with near top of the range specs when it sells for $200-300 less than the competition? If you sell it on a plan the same way you would a Galaxy S3 with the same pricing, people will not see the value in it and think they are being ripped off with the handset subsidy compared to the Google Play price: you sell it on a plan as you would other $300-350 dollar handsets, and every other rival manufacturer will go bonkers, as their margin has just been killed.
If nothing else, Google has made certain that the profitability of Samsung and - in some cases - Apple is now under greater threat then ever before.
10. ardent1 (Posts: 1999; Member since: 16 Apr 2011)
2 quick comments:
1) for $300 for the 8 GB version, I will getting the device with the $30 a month plan at TMobile / Walmart with 5GB of 4G data and 100 voice minutes. This will replace my aging Moto Triumph running Froyo.
2) people need to understand "cost plus" as a way of discerning a product's absolute profit. The cost for building that phone is probably around $220. If you add $80 in contribution margin to cover shipping and handling expenses, marketing expenses, etc. it just means Google is not making an adequate return on the phone. The cost of building a top of the line android device has dropped significantly as the OEMs has gained manufacturing expertise and the suppliers themselves also gained manufacturing experience. A few years ago, an android handset might cost $300 to design and build, but costs have dropped. This helps explain why no-contract low to mid-range android devices can be sold for about $100 to $150.
11. mydi.maus (unregistered)
13. Savage (unregistered)
This article has some mistakes. 8 GB for 299 and 16 for 249?? And 32 GB RAM is found in high end Alienware gaming workstations, not in Android flagships.
15. Haxagon (Posts: 8; Member since: 13 Jun 2011)
That doesn't mean Google's subsidising 400 USD, dumbass, just that they're charging 400 USD. You'll only be able to see how high their margins are with a teardown.
17. remixfa (Posts: 14163; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
I'm still operating under the modis operandi that Google is at least partially subsidizing the phones to the manufacturers which is why the google play store is the only place to get the phone super cheap. Think of Google as trying to be their own "carrier store". They want you to buy through them so they give you the benefit of cheaper full retail cost. Most people cant afford to buy $600 phones, but if you drop the price to $300 that opens a much wider range of customer.
As much as LG needs the limelight from the nexus program, without a subsidy of some sort, they will not be making any money at all. The Nexus7 uses an older chip, less memory, and an older technology screen with no cameras to achieve the lower price point. And its being sold basically at cost. What is the motive for Asus to do such a thing? They already own a large chunk of the android tablet market with high profit margin devices, why would they basically give something away for free? There must be a backroom deal of some sort for kickbacks from google per sale. Amazon is a content provider garunteed to make money back. Google wants to be a content provider and will make the money back on the device subsidy through play store purchases. There is no benefit to the manufacturers at all without a subsidy. In fact it would be counterproductive for them without the subsidy because they are undercutting sales of their premium products.
Google wants to push Play store adoption and disrupt carrier subsidies. Selling the previous nexus devices at regular full retail did not do it. They are now selling the most powerful version ever.. by far... at the same price as last year's nexus before it got removed. It IS subsidized to gain relevance. That is the only answer.
19. McLTE (Posts: 714; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
It's simple.. if LG is charging Google more for the phone than what Google is selling it for.. then Google is subsidizing the phone.
If Google is purchasing the phone for less than their advertised price.. then the phone is not being subsidized at all.. Google is taking a smaller profit.
We are talking one piece of hardware here.. one phone. Google could very well be giving LG incentives, portions of the profits.. who knows what.. but that is NOT a phone subsidy in my view.
You do bring up some intersting thoughts though.. it will be interesting to see how the phone landscape changes.. if Google can pull off carrying a variety of phones at these kind of prices, what will the carriers do?
What will the manufacturers do?? I don't see Apple being able to continue to charge their outrageous prices for phones.. not as consumers see the value in unlocked devices and not having carrier contract commitments.
Carriers would be charged less per phone by the manufacturers, then would have to do less subsidizing.. resulting in costs dropping for plans for everyone? LOL.. yeah right. They will pay less in subsidies for the phones, but will NOT reduce plan costs. :P
22. goodvalue (Posts: 3; Member since: 06 Nov 2012)
PC & Notebook & LCD-TV price have gone south... Why not phone?
I believe what Google trying to prove here is, they still make GOOD money with that much price, and if apple & microsoft want to survive, they should play by google rule.
25. philyew (Posts: 3; Member since: 06 Nov 2012)
Google's pricing strategy for the Nexus 4 has a number of objectives, but precipitating a general reduction in hardware costs isn't one of them, I suspect.
The Nexus 4 will take some selling in a number of markets. Why? No LTE. Limited internal storage and no expandable memory. An unfriendly battery replacement procedure against a less than impressive battery performance.
There's no way that I would spend what would be a normal MSRP for this device, but $350 has me tempted and Google needs to continue to promote the Nexus brand.
29. remixfa (Posts: 14163; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
The play store would have to be a huge success for the carriers to pay attention. Google subsidizing the phone is a big step to getting it in the limelight, but its not gonna be instant. Your probably looking at a few years worth of decent success before anyone other than the geek crowd really notices.
The phone is most definitely subsidized.
However, if I had to guess, the goal would be to introduce each successive Nexus at a slightly higher price point to get it back to regular retail and not have such a sticker shock as people get used to buying this way. Its retraining the public. I doubt the goal is for google to constantly lose money on every nexus sold just to disrupt carriers.
18. Kan_wha (Posts: 88; Member since: 25 Jun 2012)
Selling at cost isn't the same thing as subsidizing.
20. android4president (Posts: 5; Member since: 14 Oct 2012)
Google shut up and take my money! I mean come on they have to start making profit of Android at some point, maybe not a huge profit but a couple of dollars for every phone maybe. I dont want Google or Android to collapse so please take my money!
23. philyew (Posts: 3; Member since: 06 Nov 2012)
Who's to say that T-Mobile are buying the device from Google? Look at the stories emerging from Europe where retailers are canceling their order for the Nexus 4 FROM LG because they (LG) are setting an MSRP twice the price in the Google Play store.
T-Mobile's pricing makes perfect sense, if they are buying from LG rather than Google. It may not be good for consumers, but it is more in line with the established MSRP average for devices of this quality.
26. eeninay (Posts: 1; Member since: 06 Nov 2012)
You are lucky when buying this phones, you will get $400 from Google.
I am a bad luck since Google Play are not distributing this phone in my Country.
28. yajia1 (Posts: 112; Member since: 22 Aug 2012)
Google just doesnt care about the profit they will get from the phone's hardware. They just want everyone to be happy and Apple be pissed. Sadly, LG's thoughts are on the other side of the fence.