x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Home
  • News
  • Galaxy S5 battery life tests show promising results

Galaxy S5 battery life tests show promising results

Galaxy S5 battery life tests show promising results
Coming straight from Samsung's homeland, an impromptu battery test reveals that the Galaxy S5 is shaping up to be quite the endurance champ. The flagship is laden with a 2800 mAh battery, while we have phones in the same category with 3000+ mAh units, like the Xperia Z2

Capacity is not everything, but given today's largely uniform components, it is a pretty good determinant of the overall endurance. Unless you mounted a display with older technology, that is (cough, Z1, cough), which would draw quite a lot of power, resulting in unimpressive screen-on times even with a 3000 mAh unit in there.

Still, as you can see from the charts below, the Galaxy S5 topped the available phone row, and sits just below popular tablets and phablets, whose batteries are much larger. The screens were set at roughly 230 nits of brightness, as well as in peak luminance mode, so the Wi-Fi browsing test has been quite tasking, and yet the S5 managed to pull off more than 7 hours of screen-on time, which is quite impressive. We'll put the Galaxy S5 to the battery test ourselves soon, but in the meantime it seems that battery life won't be an issue with the handset. 

Prompted by a reader comment, we are inserting another battery life test chart, which confirm the stellar endurance of the S5. There the phone lasted more than 10 hours of browsing via Wi-Fi, which is in line with what Samsung promised. This test, however, has been done with the screen set at just 120 nits of brightness, that is why the battery life stats are much higher than in the first scenario, where the screen is set at 230 nits or more.

41 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 31 Mar 2014, 02:31 2

1. torr310 (Posts: 454; Member since: 27 Oct 2011)


All I can see is Note 2 still rocks!

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 02:36 7

3. Ashoaib (Posts: 2438; Member since: 15 Nov 2013)


S5 is doing good endurance with 2800mah... In my view if s5 housed a 3200mah inside... it might be a killer phone n killing the competion leap frog

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:21

15. mr.techdude (Posts: 555; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)


Too bad it didn't have 3200 mah, it all really depends on software optimization not just how big the battery is.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 05:16

27. procol (Posts: 16; Member since: 28 Feb 2013)


GS5 is on par with Note 3 even though it just has 2800mAh according to the translation of Playwares battery test(this article's source). Google nutgrafs.com. (Sorry I can't insert link.)

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 09:17

37. Synack (Posts: 669; Member since: 05 Jul 2011)


I'm sure some battery company will release a ~3500mah battery with the same size dimensions.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 02:39 3

5. Sauce (unregistered)


Which is why I still have mine ^_^
As well as my iPhone 5s. Damn good results for a 1500mah battery, compared to my Note and the rest of these 3-8ks

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 02:54 1

7. giani (Posts: 269; Member since: 13 Nov 2012)


I still can't see how anyone with common sence would choose this over the M8 or Z2..

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:05 12

12. Astoni (Posts: 576; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)


I could easily choose S5 over Z2 :p, sure z2 has better specs but i've had enough with the squared bulk of a z1..

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:30 13

18. galanoth (Posts: 343; Member since: 26 Nov 2011)


Well the Z2 and M8 have LCD screens.
What if the user likes AMOLED screens?
S5 Z2 M8 are all good phones.
It's all just personal preference.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 11:04 3

38. Taters (Posts: 3606; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


Lol it's more like the other way around. Common sense tells you that phones shouldn't be the size of phablets and in that case, the GS5 wins hands down.

And that isn't even mentioning the superior internals...

posted on 01 Apr 2014, 03:56

39. The13thKing (banned) (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)


Life is hard :( everyone will buy S5 while no one will care about great htc and sony not to mention glorious nokia :(

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 02:32 12

2. galanoth (Posts: 343; Member since: 26 Nov 2011)


Better battery life is always a good thing.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 05:47 1

28. anirudhshirsat97 (Posts: 400; Member since: 24 May 2011)


Amen!

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 02:38 3

4. TechFreak123 (Posts: 85; Member since: 25 Feb 2014)


Look at this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2689011

Really amazed.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 08:11 3

36. tedkord (Posts: 5308; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


Man, look at the iPhone 5s. Battery life used to be one of the iPhone' talking points. They really need to stop with the obsession with achieving a phone so thin you can shave with it, add a mm or two in thickness and bump up the mAh. But then, so do a lot of vendors.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 02:48 2

6. GMS85 (Posts: 157; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


Not for me though!

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 02:57 9

9. tech2 (Posts: 2479; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)


Then why trolling this article ? Did you just came here to tell everyone that you don't like this device no matter how good it is ? Seriously ?

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:02 1

10. GMS85 (Posts: 157; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


I ain't trolling buddy, but we all know that when it comes to battery department Samsung sucks! Accept it.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:10 11

13. tenho1982 (Posts: 62; Member since: 29 Dec 2013)


Who taught you that? olo

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:12 8

14. TylerGrunter (Posts: 1058; Member since: 16 Feb 2012)


??
Samung devices have been always known to have a good battery life. In particular excelent stand by times.
Any prove of what you say? Or just babbling about?

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:21 1

16. GMS85 (Posts: 157; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


LMAO, coming from S3 and S4, oh I know what I'm talking about..

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:35 12

19. tech2 (Posts: 2479; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)


S3 and S4 had great battery life ! Better than HTC, LG, Apple and Sony at the time of its release.

S4:http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-galaxy-s4-battery-tests-are-done-heres-how-it-did/

S3:http://blog.gsmarena.com/samsung-galaxy-s-iii-battery-test-is-ready-does-very-well/

Don't just troll without any backing. BTW, did you even read this article ?! S5 almost on par with Note 3 and beats the socks off Z2 and LG G2 with their massive 3200 mah !

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:43

21. GMS85 (Posts: 157; Member since: 26 Sep 2012)


Now that's a joke! I have had both devices, So those test don't mean a damn to me!

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 07:08 5

34. noteseries (Posts: 80; Member since: 29 Oct 2013)


so which phone have the best battery life? sony? htc?.... lol

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:24

17. mr.techdude (Posts: 555; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)


If it wasn't for that removable battery, Sammy would have been the absolute worst in this department, I've never met anyone who stayed with the first battery in around six months. And also the heat is hotter then an oven when playing a game for 10-15 min.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:35 6

20. tech2 (Posts: 2479; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)


Read comment #19

posted on 01 Apr 2014, 04:02

41. The13thKing (banned) (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)


I have had many samsungs for four years now, and so did the rest of my family, we never had any issues. So go troll somewhere else, crybaby

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:48 2

23. TylerGrunter (Posts: 1058; Member since: 16 Feb 2012)


What tech2 said: both were execlent performers as shown in any battery test I have seen in the nerwork.
See comment #19.

posted on 01 Apr 2014, 04:00

40. The13thKing (banned) (Posts: 849; Member since: 26 Feb 2014)


Yes. B|_|tthurts like you own the neglected nokias htcs and sonys. You dont even know what a samsung is. Stop trolling every samsung article. And get a life. Hey, lets talk Market Share, i know you love this.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 02:55 9

8. twens (Posts: 700; Member since: 25 Feb 2012)


No one is forcing to buy it. Buy what makes u happy and shut up.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:03

11. gigaraga (Posts: 1381; Member since: 29 Mar 2013)


Excellent!

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 03:47

22. Lampriya (Posts: 218; Member since: 05 Oct 2013)


Tested by Samsung and posted by Samsung.... Nice drama. lol

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 04:28 6

25. shuaibhere (Posts: 1684; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)


Proof????

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 04:27 5

24. Tsepz_GP (Posts: 852; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)


Another Galaxy S with excellent battery life :)

I've had the GS2, GS3 and GS4 and all have been incredible performers when it comes to Battery life on days where I have no time to access a charger, my GS4 currently gives me up to 6h on screen, but I hardly ever get it there as I get tired, lol.

Not getting a GS5 though, waiting for the almighty Note, but I'm glad the GS5 is keeping up the excellent battery endurance Samsung spoils us with each year.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 04:59 7

26. _Bone_ (Posts: 2140; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


Most underrated phone of the year so far. True, it's built out of IP certified plastic, but that's all for the better grip, dust and watertight body and easy repairability, and that body packs a blazing fast phone with great endurance, an excellent new-gen camera and the best feature pack on a phone (incl. the several hundred dollars worth of subscriptions, if I'm correct).

This is a welcomed change for Samsung. Last year it was all about the flashy things and gestures, but so came the S-Lag and some other issues, glossy plastic included. This year it's about hand comfort, protection against the elements, speedy SW & photography and the enjoyment away from the charger.

Isn't it what a phone supposed to be?

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 05:58

30. Sora77 (Posts: 23; Member since: 31 Mar 2014)


You troll too much dude. Some review said its camera is on par with S4, and even worse occasionally. Its repairability is also proved to be low because of being water resistant.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 06:24 4

32. tech2 (Posts: 2479; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)


Truth hurts isn't it.

Kindly point me to a reliable review which says the camera is on par with S4, please !

So you want a water and dust resistant phone which also just opens when you clap ?! Ofcourse it will be tightly shut for IP67 certification.

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 06:37

33. Sora77 (Posts: 23; Member since: 31 Mar 2014)


Dude, chill out, I just point out what you said is wrong. You seem to admit now it isn't easy to be fixed. I never said I want something. I saw about the camera in the news in which S5 is reviewed by a guy in Russia. And I could also say could you please kindly show me the review which said it has excellent new gen camera?

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 05:56

29. Gemmol (Posts: 564; Member since: 09 Nov 2011)


the battery life do not sound bad, but honestly think phone makers should forget about the phone size. What I mean to say is that they do not need to make it big like a brick, but a decent size with a big battery.

I love the battery on my 1520, if Microsoft make the upgrade to the 1520 battery smaller I would be sad

here a link of my battery lifehttp://postimg.org/image/64ld3gqjn/

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 06:05 1

31. Apoorvtheman (Posts: 42; Member since: 25 Jun 2012)


Samsung phones have nice battery optimization now I would get a Samsung phone enough with Sony

posted on 31 Mar 2014, 07:28 1

35. antonioli (Posts: 189; Member since: 08 Sep 2013)


Not bad but it would be better if they have put a 3200mAh battery ou something around that.

One thing that I didn't understand is the 2610mAh battery from LG G2. I suppose that may be Korean version but I was interested to see the international version results with 3000mAh battery.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories