Apple's Phil Schiller on the new iPad name: "because we don't want to be predictable"
1. Bluesky02 posted on 08 Mar 2012, 03:43 4 0
Congratulation to PhoneArena, most of their rumors were right.
2. oddmanout posted on 08 Mar 2012, 03:45 15 1
Lmao apple is more predictable than tomorrow's date. They slightly update the obvious and call it new. Everything that was predicted to be on the iPad 3 was on the iPad 3. And still people will swear its the most innovating thing since sliced bread. I like apple products but they make me sick sometimes.
3. 9_HeLLs_oF_DrOid posted on 08 Mar 2012, 04:01 8 2
"because we don't want to be predictable" - y u no try being unpredictable for your iOS also?
5. frydaexiii posted on 08 Mar 2012, 04:33 6 0
Didn't want to be predictable, so they came up with "new iPad"? That's like your parents asking you to go buy a pet for the house, and you come back home with a watermelon instead and say "I didn't want to be predictable".
6. anywherehome posted on 08 Mar 2012, 05:05 10 0
my prediction was: the new iPad will have higher resolution and higher performance.....nothing else :)
you are predictable :)
7. andro. posted on 08 Mar 2012, 05:29 6 0
This year they have released the 'new' ipad under the exact same name finally admitting that its just a re-release of the exact same product on the market already.
10. akita256 posted on 08 Mar 2012, 07:59 1 0
So this model is the "new" iPad. The next one in 2013 will be the "newer" iPad, and the year after that in 2014 Apple will name the latest one the "newest" iPad. So everybody will be confused when in 2014 the "newest" one is released but the "newer" one is discounted and you go into the store and ask for the "newer" model and they hand you the old model..........????? Yeh, right.
11. hepresearch (unregistered) posted on 08 Mar 2012, 08:23 3 0
Apple: We don't want to be predictable, like everyone else who keeps the same name for their products over and over again, and just increases the iteration number by one... so, we are going to be doing different and unique things which no one else has done before, like successfully shaming existing customers into buying the "New iPad" by not giving it a new number and insinuating that anything prior is "old"... other companies would never get away with it, and would alienate their fan base, but we're Apple...
12. shamataa posted on 08 Mar 2012, 10:25 2 1
That is such a lame excuse to not have a better name for it.
13. bayusuputra posted on 08 Mar 2012, 11:14 1 0
16. aoikemono27 posted on 08 Mar 2012, 19:32 0 0
ITIt's a dumb name. I think whoever thought it was genius should be fired. It's a complete pain to search for, to differentiate from the "old iPad", and a nightmare for the layman. Not to mention since they are still selling the iPad 2, people will think that is the better one since logic follows 2 is better than 1 and having no number makes it the de facto 1. Only Apple could pull this off, from sheer pop culture recognition that there's a new one every year. It won't change the fact many people will still get confused. This is even worse than antennagate...
17. thebikerboi2 posted on 08 Mar 2012, 23:28 0 0
I think they did it to avoid calling the "new iPad" the iPad 2s,