Apple iPhone 4S benchmark tests
Under the hood, the iPhone 4S is packing that glistening 1GHz dual-core Apple A5 processor with 512MB of RAM. Respectable by today’s standards, some might not be all that impressed with the amount of RAM on board with the device, but then again, iOS 5 isn’t the most graphically intensive platform out there on the market.
Running the Linpack benchmark on both devices, we’re astounded by the near instant completion of the test by the iPhone 4S – while its predecessor chugs along finishing considerably longer. Specifically, the iPhone 4S is able to establish itself as the superior device between the two since it’s able to push out 138.22 Mflop/s, which is light years better than the 33.65 Mflop/s score of the iPhone 4. And honestly, the lengthy completion of the test by the iPhone 4 goes to show the speedy nature of the iPhone 4S.
Secondly, we ran a quick graphical test by using 3D Benchmark, which is a WWII style era airplane game test. Mainly due to the game’s less than stellar graphics, the final scores of both devices are relatively close to one another. In fact, the iPhone 4S is able to complete the test in 8.294952 seconds and chugs along at 60.16 FPS. In contrast, the iPhone 4 dishes up a total test time of 8.699314 seconds and an average rate of 57.36 FPS.
Next up, we ran the Comet Benchmark app that shows an animation of a comet running through its trajectory around the sun. Initially, both are able to handle a single comet on-screen at a steady rate of 60 frames per second, but as we crank it up to the maximum 10 comets, we begin to see the raw processing power of the newer handset. Even with 10 comets simultaneously loaded, the iPhone 4S is handling it effortlessly at a consistent 60 frames per second – whereas the iPhone 4 drops down under the 24 FPS mark.
Last, but certainly not least, we ran the interactive and graphically intensive demo of Epic Citadel, which truly showcases the type of experience we’ll get playing some quality games. Initially, it’s very hard to find any differences in performance, but after looking at them both meticulously, the iPhone 4S is still able to produce the smoother response. It’s not bad with the iPhone 4, but there’s a subtle amount of choppiness with its operation.
1. AKm007 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 10:51 16
Why do you keep saying that it's a 1 ghz dual core? It's a 800mhz one. Stop hiding the facts!!
4. speed4evr posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:10 5
It is a 1Ghz buts its underclocked to 800Mhz.
24. remixfa posted on 20 Oct 2011, 12:42 11
which would make it 800mhz.
there is no "underclock/overclock" the clock is what its set at.
its only "underclocked" if you get it at 1ghz and underclock it to 800mhz yourself... which is something I do on my galaxyS since it runs smoothly for most things, even at 800mhz.. get that extra battery juice :)
they dont say "this is a 1.5ghz overclocked snapdragon dual core.. they just say its 1.5ghz.
32. v4vendetta14 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 14:03 2
It is still a 1GHz chip underclocked to 800Mhz. It is the exact same processor as on the Ipad.
If I overclock my 3gs, do I claim that the native speed is really the overclocked speed?
36. Dark4o90 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 15:19 1
that is exactly what you are saying. If it's 800Mhz it won't be 1Ghz it's working on 800 so it's 800 not 1ghz if my C2Duo 6420 is on 3Ghz it is 3ghz if it is 2.13 it is 2.13 that's it
44. burtonsnow8 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 17:46 0
No, no, and no.
Snapdragon CPU (the first model, not the subsequent models), was clocked at 1Ghz. As a user there were programs that allowed you to change the multiplier of the clock or change the core clock speed. As the crystal frequency is usually based on the tolerances and build quality of that specific snapdragon CPU in your machine, it is a much safer bet to change the multiplier than to change the clock frequency. As the newer models were released the quality and improvements of that same chip allowed the frequency and multiplier to be adjusted to greater levels. All are still on the same architecture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture), so the chip is still a snapdragon, but with upgraded components that are rated to a higher clock frequency. It is the same architecture (which all snapdragon runs on the ARMv7 instruction set) with different semiconductor technology. So from the factory they were just improving upon existing designs with new model snapdragons, and not all snap dragons are created equal.
Basically, from the factory these crystals are rated for a certain frequency, and based on their ability placed into different chips. What i'm assuming apple is doing is using their lower rated CPUs for the 4s.
49. burtonsnow8 posted on 21 Oct 2011, 16:46 1
I wouldn't doubt if apple used batches of chips that didn't pass quality control for the ipad 2.
28. rf1975 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 13:40 2
It does not matter that the A5 is under clocked or over clocked. It beat all phone out there with 800Mhz
3. remixfa posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:01 8
lol.. i think they are having trouble remembering that apple DROPPED the mhz.. not raised them.
5. Astreo posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:11 4
The fact its only a 800 mhz only makes it all the more impressive considering the scores its getting.
47. cheetah2k posted on 20 Oct 2011, 20:29 1
And just as well its not 1Ghz with the unbelievable battery drain...
6. LaClare posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:12 1
I would hope that the 4S should be better than the 4. But let’s benchmark it against the Galaxy SII or Motorola Driod Razor.
18. burtonsnow8 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:52 2
No point until ICS comes out, GB doesn't utilize the dual core processor fully.
23. remixfa posted on 20 Oct 2011, 12:41 5
cant wait for the nexus vs droid razr comparisons since they use very similar hardware setups. that will really show any difference between ICS and gingerbread.
31. Joshing4fun posted on 20 Oct 2011, 14:00 0
Plus i believe they have same processors so it should also tell us how much the 720p screen slows the nexus down. Hopefully not much at all.
26. rf1975 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 13:34 1
Hey my dear 4S already beat SII
39. Dark4o90 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 15:24 1
wow i can't believe it really haha that the ti 4460 is released a year after exynos an still S2 is better
43. burtonsnow8 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 17:36 1
Hey my dear, 4s used benchmarks that don't mean anything:
Take a look at the on screen results and you see how very little difference there is between the two. Then ICS and it should be just about neck and neck.
7. clevername posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:15 3
The A5 is a dual core 1ghz chip. Not 800 MHz. But in the iPhone 4s its under locked to 800mhz.phonearena isn't wrong, they just didn't mention the under locking.
17. burtonsnow8 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:50 0
you mean under clocked/clocking, there is no such thing as under locking a cpu clock (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock_rate)
42. burtonsnow8 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 17:34 0
yes, but now he also can use the correct words, plus maybe it will help him better understand the dynamics behind a CPU.
40. Dark4o90 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 15:26 0
it doesn't matter that it is underclocked it is not dual core 1ghz it is 800mhz and it won't be 1ghz that's it
8. VZWuser76 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:19 3
The point is it doesn't matter if it's a 1GHz chip, but what it's running at. If it were the other way around and it was a 1GHz chip overclocked to 1.2GHz, you'd be jumping all over him saying that it's a 1.2 not a 1.0.
13. clevername posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:35 0
Lol. I wasn't jumping all over him. I'm no rabid fanboy, don't even own any apple products anymore. I just wanted to set facts straight. If it was overclocked to 1.2 I'd have gladly made more of that as well. But yes you are right it matters more what it's at.
9. anirudhshirsat97 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:22 0
Is there anyway to compare those tests with android and windows 7 phones??
11. darac posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:23 3
iPhone 4S has by far the best phone GPU today - a double POWER VR 543 chip.
But coupled with tiny 3.5 inch screen, it means Jack sh!t.
IPhone is NOT a device you want to play epic graphically intense fps's or rpg's on.
As for the CPU, it's just an average dual core underclocked in the name of battery efficiency.
12. Snapdude posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:25 1
powervr 543m is nice, REALLY NICE. but by no means the best
16. clevername posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:41 0
Best in any chip currently on market. And good enough for Sony to use its quad core big brother in the PSVita. And those visuals are amazing. But no, not best ever.
14. Evil_SaNz posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:40 0
Would be nice if you could plug xbox / ps3 controllers like on android, else all this power is, like you said, wasted on a 3.5 inch screen. I think that the upcoming Asus "Prime" tablet will be a breaktrough in mobile gaming: USB support, nvidia kal-el, ICS. We still need to see the performance of phones like the SGS2 with Android OS 4.0.1, I hope it will improve a lot. Will see! =)
30. iosmaster posted on 20 Oct 2011, 14:00 0
@evil_sanz u can jailbreak and plug a wii or ps3 controller to it then mirror it to your 60 inch oled tv, using a cheap apple tv u can even play multiplayer all on the same tv using idevices as controls like the video on real racing
15. Astreo posted on 20 Oct 2011, 11:40 4
oh what graphic instense fps and rpg games are you playing on your phone? none...hmm i thought as much. you all keep forgetting everything else on ALL the phones regardless of brand and OS are just features. they are for texting and calling primarily. its nice to be able to say you have such high specs but no one ever really uses them.
20. Tmachaveli posted on 20 Oct 2011, 12:09 1
Well of course its gonna be faster its dual core..and like he said the os isn't" that graphically intensive platform out there on the market".There is no suprise here
22. Lwazi_N posted on 20 Oct 2011, 12:36 2
But can't there be an Antutu benchmark app for iPhone/4/S or the same benchmark apps used on Android, so we see the exact benchmarks when compared to Android. What this iPhone 4S benchmark is gibberish to me. A standard benchmark app would be good- so we see how iGadgets, Symbian, Bada, Android, BB and WP7, all perform.
25. PotDragon posted on 20 Oct 2011, 12:54 0
Plus they could at least tell us what carriers phone they used and verify those scores are 3g scores and not on wifi.
Really love to know why iphonearena keeps posting the wrong specs? Is it an intention to decieve, outright stupidity, or the editorial standereds of an elementary school report? Go ahead...tell us again how att's version is "technically" 4g. Sigh.
45. NVPMOTHAF posted on 20 Oct 2011, 19:01 0
Do you consider the EVO 4g a 4g device? Last time I checked it doesn't really differ from ATT "4G".
27. rf1975 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 13:37 0
Hey this is for all blind Galaxy SII fans
29. squallz506 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 13:57 1
i would hope that the 4s blows away the four considering it was released a year and a half later. in fact considering the time between releases im not impressed at all.
34. Dragonkingamn posted on 20 Oct 2011, 14:09 1
If the screen was 4 inches or bigger and 4g, i would of picked it up quick. i really dont want a screen smaller than my Droid 1. i'll be waiting for Razr since it has every aspect of a phone i want. ICS down the road too
46. scvzw2 posted on 20 Oct 2011, 20:17 3
Considering the app launcher ... I mean OS it should be this fast no suprise here!
48. belovedson posted on 21 Oct 2011, 01:01 0
can you guys post up a real benchmark. sun spyder? seriously!!!! what the heck. linpack is a little better. i use it to check for stability... real benchmarks please
50. cnwwyo posted on 21 Oct 2011, 20:19 1
The JOTO is awfull quiet on this one?????????????? looooool
51. flawlesssolita posted on 24 Oct 2011, 10:59 0
the apple iphone 4 has low battery and is running on wifi, where the 4s is on sprints network and has over 85% battery, i dont think a full battery and a network would make a drastic improvement, but the tests should be run with equal parameters.. just saying