So here's a breakdown of the unfair taxes. Let's say the plan as a whole cost $100 per month, and $30 of that was for mobile Internet access. AT&T was charging taxes on the $100, rather than only $70. And that is in violation of the Internet Tax Freedom Act, which prevents taxes from being imposed on Internet access between November 1, 2003, and November 1, 2014.
While AT&T probably could have put up more of a fight, the plaintiffs' lawyers have been impressed with AT&T's candor and willingness to settle: "AT&T was really forthcoming about it and did an unprecedented job of working with us," said the plaintiffs' lead counsel.
We have to commend AT&T for being so agreeable, but we wonder if their willingness to settle might be tied to their potential T-Mobile acquisition. With customer satisfaction waning, and public opinion stacked against the merger, AT&T might have figured that it would be better to take the nearly $1 billion loss, and keep their attorneys focused on the T-Mobile deal.
source: Dayton Business Journal via FierceWireless