Get the best of PhoneArena in your inbox!

Fitbit Air Review

The Fitbit Air is all about the minimal, no-distraction design and non-stop heart rate tracking

0
Why you can trust PhoneArena
25+ Years of Experience
4192 Product Reviews
Fitbit Air in Berry color
The band goes on top of the tracker for a seamless, non-techy look | Image by PhoneArena
For the past week, I’ve been wearing the Fitbit Air on my right wrist, while on my left wrist, I’ve had the Apple Watch Series 11.

See, the Fitbit Air costs just $100 and it’s a tracker with no screen and no disruptions. And you can also access all of its data in the beautiful new Google Health app without a subscription. Compare this to the $200 you need to spend every year to access your Whoop band data or the expensive Oura ring ($350 or more) and its $6 monthly subscription, and the Fitbit looks like the deal of the century.

But are there any hidden pitfalls? I think there is one, but let’s start with the look and feel.

Fitbit Air design



There is actually not much to say about the design except that minimalism is the selling point here, but one little detail bugged me surprisingly often — the Fitbit Air constantly gets stuck in my sleeve when I’m changing, and this literally never happens with the Apple Watch. It’s most certainly because it has two layers above your wrist, the band being the second one, and it’s much easier to catch your sleeve. It’s not a big deal, but definitely an annoyance.

I really like the color options too. Only the Berry color option was available at purchase, and I typically don’t like such louder colors, but this one sits surprisingly well.



It’s also very lightweight, I just forget I have it on when I go to sleep, which is kind of the point.



I also really enjoyed the break from notifications, wearing this even as a second gadget to your smartwatch is very doable.

Fitbit Air battery life and charging



The other big advantage of using the Fitbit Air over a traditional smartwatch is the battery life. Google says the Air will last you 7 days on a single charge, and I can say that it actually beats that. In my use, it dropped from 70% to 29% in the four days I kept a close eye on it, or roughly 10% battery use per day, so it will realistically last 8 to 9 days easily.

And to charge it, you use this little contraption, it has two pins so the Fitbit snaps nice and tight. The charge does a fine job, but I wish it did not come with the cable attached to it. This is just one more cable you need to carry. Companies like Coros now have a tiny charging brick that plugs into a regular USB-C cable, which makes a lot more sense.

Step counting



Next, step counting. Alright, my first test for the Ftibit Air was pure walking. And just look at the similarity between the Fitbit and the Apple Watch Series 11. I have previously verified the Apple Watch to be very close to reality, so that’s a great indication for the Fitbit as well.

Workout tracking



Alright, but what is the biggest advantage of the Fitbit Air compared to something like an Apple Watch?

First, since it doesn’t have an energy-hungry screen, so it can measure your heart rate without interruptions, exactly every 5 seconds in normal use. When it detects workouts, it starts measuring your heart rate every single second. In comparison, the Apple Watch only measures your heart rate once every 2 to 5 minutes in normal use, but also jumps to 1-second sampling when you start a workout.

This is a huge advantage for the Fitbit, but the thing is, I’m not really convinced that heart rate tracking is always accurate. And actually, I’m not even sure it’s always a real measurement.

I walk a lot, doing at least 10,000 steps almost every day, and a typical walk looks like this, as you can see, my heart rate goes up to around 100 beats per minute at most, but not more, actually, usually it is lower.



Last Tuesday, I did something different, walking up the stairs at the office, and you can see that the Fitbit picked this up nice. It’s still categorized as a walk, but you can see how my heart goes up to 137bpm when I’m walking up and then I descended, and just finished this as a regular walk, and you can see my heart rate quickly normalize. I did the same exercise on Thursday and again, the Fitbit picked it up with automatic detection, caught that spike in heart rate as I walked up the stairs. That looks like a real measurement. Cool.



But look at the Google Health log for Friday, Saturday and Sunday. I worked out all three days in the gym, as evidenced by my functional strength workouts that I recorded on the Apple Watch, and the Fitbit didn’t catch any of those sessions.

Training in the gym comes with these quick spikes in heart rate and then quick dips as you rest between sets, and I guess that makes it too hard for the Fitbit.

And then, I just get really weird readings for some workouts. I went home on my electric scooter on Monday night. Riding an electric scooter is not even a workout, it’s not supposed to spike my heart rate at all. But the Fitbit did. It initially assigned this to be a bike workout, I then went into Google Health and manually corrected it, there was an option for an electric scoore ride, so I picked that.



So far so good, but look at the heart rate readings. I would have definitely felt my heart rate going up to 150bpms on that easy night ride, but I know that was not the case. It was just a regular, easy scooter ride. I doubt my heart rate went above 120bpm, probably even lower.

So what happened? I think the Fitbit just detected this as a bike workout, and it most likely uses the GPS data to calculate my speed, and I think based on that it comes up with this wild heart rate number estimation.

Essentially, I think it guesses how hard my heart would work if I were cycling at that speed. I have seen something similar on Garmin watches, one of them didn’t have an ebike profile, so I just used the regular bike mode for an e-bike ride, and I got super inaccurate heart rate data. Essentially, the Garmin also did not seem to read my heart rate data, but rather estimated my exertion to be much higher than it actually was.

I think something similar might be happening with the Fitbit. I cannot really prove it, of course, but I just now have doubts about the heart rate readings at all.

That’s a real bummer. Not only do you need to manually correct and label many of your workouts in the Google Health app, but I can’t fully trust it for all workouts. Now granted, this might be something very specific with bike rides and electric scooters, so you might not run into this issue at all.

Sleep tracking



Sleep tracking was probably the most important metric to me. I think sleep is incredibly important to overall well-being, so I like tracking my total sleep time. Some other watches I’ve tested like Garmins regularly miss the time I wake up, but the Fitbit Air is excellent here, it nails the time exactly, and actually, when you compare it to an Apple Watch, both do a great job with that, and this is very helpful when you are trying to build a routine and get to bed on time.



However, the Fitbit Air and Apple Watch give me very different estimates for my sleep stages. Take a look at the above comparison: the Apple Watch regularly detects that I get insufficient deep sleep, while the Fitbit Air says I am getting a proper amount.

You can see at the first tracked night of sleep, the Ftibit Air reports 1 hour and 27 minutes of deep sleep versus just 28 minutes on the Apple Watch. The second night, the Fitbit Air reports again roughly one hour and a half versus 32 minutes on the Apple Watch.

Recommended For You
Right now, such conflicting information only shows how chaotic sleep stage analysis can be.

I do like the few additional metrics you get on the Fitbit Air, though — sleep efficiency is nice and helpful, and there is a whole section with sleep meditation and relaxing sounds in the Google Health app, while Apple Health feels very barebones in comparison.

I also noticed that heart rate variability (HRV) numbers were again very different between the Fitbit Air and the Apple Watch.

Final thoughts



Despite all of these quirks, I really enjoyed wearing the Fitbit Air. The sleek, non-techy design is a big win, and I appreciated the non-stop heart rate tracking and accurate numbers for my sleep duration. I also enjoyed the new Google Health app, even if I did not use the AI coach features.

If you want a lifestyle tracker rather than a fitness tracker, the Fitbit Air does a great job, just know its limitations.

Recommended For You
COMMENTS (0)
Latest Discussions
by readdriver • 2
by ECPirate37 • 2
by menooch18 • 2