- Home
- Samsung Phones
- You are here
Samsung ATIV S Neo Specs
Description
The Samsung ATIV S Neo packs a sizable 4.8" HD display, 1.4 GHz dual-core processor and an ambitious 8MP camera that will come with a bunch of camera apps and shooting modes to augment the phone's camera capabilities.
This device is also known as Samsung I8675, Samsung SPH-I800
Popular Comparisons
The Samsung ATIV S Neo is most commonly compared with these phones:
Specs
Display |
|
---|---|
Size | 4.8-inch |
Resolution | 1280 x 720 px, 308 PPI |
Technology | TFT |
Screen-to-body | 67.06 % |
Colors | 16 777 216 |
Features | Ambient light sensor, Proximity sensor |
Hardware |
|
---|---|
System chip | Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930-AA |
Processor | Dual-core, 1400 MHz, Krait 300 |
GPU | Adreno 305 |
RAM | 1GB (LPDDR2) |
Internal storage | 16GB |
Storage expansion | microSDXC up to 64 GB |
OS | Windows Phone |
Device type | Smartphone |
This device has different variants: View all |
Battery |
|
---|---|
Capacity | 2000 mAh |
Type | Li - Ion, User replaceable |
Camera |
|
---|---|
Rear | Single camera |
Main camera | 8 MP (Autofocus) |
Flash | LED |
Video recording |
1920x1080 (Full HD) (30 fps) Features: Picture-taking during video recording |
Front | 1.2 MP |
Design |
|
---|---|
Dimensions |
5.33 x 2.72 x 0.36 inches (135 x 69 x 9 mm) |
Weight | 5.08 oz(144.0 g) |
This device has different variants: View all |
Cellular |
|
---|---|
4G (FDD) | Bands 25(1900+) |
3G | Bands 2(1900), 1(2100) |
Data Speed | LTE, HSPA, UMTS |
This device has different variants: View all |
Multimedia |
|
---|---|
Headphones | 3.5mm jack |
Speakers | Earpiece, Loudspeaker |
Features | Album art cover, Background playback |
Connectivity & Features |
|
---|---|
Bluetooth | Yes |
Wi-Fi | Yes |
USB | microUSB, USB 2.0, Features: Mass storage device, Charging |
Location | GPS, A-GPS |
Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass |
Other | NFC, Tethering, Computer sync, OTA sync |
Regulatory Approval |
|
---|---|
FCC approval |
Date approved: Sep 04, 2013 FCC ID value: A3LSPHI800 |
Measured SAR |
Head: 0.51 W/kg Body: 1.09 W/kg Simultaneous Transmission: 1.52 W/kg Wireless Router: 1.09 W/kg |
This device has different variants: View all |
Phone Features |
|
---|---|
Notifications | Haptic feedback, Music ringtones (MP3), Polyphonic ringtones, Vibration, Flight mode, Silent mode, Speakerphone |
Other features | Voice dialing, Voice commands, Voice recording, TTY/TDD |
Availability |
|
---|---|
Officially announced | Jun 26, 2013 |
Alternative variants
Differences from the main variant: | |
---|---|
OS | Windows Phone |
Weight | 5.04 oz(143.0 g) |
4G (FDD) | Bands 17(700 b), 5(850), 4(AWS-1), 2(1900) |
3G | Bands 5(850), 2(1900), 1(2100) |
FCC approval |
Date approved: Feb 10, 2014 FCC ID value: A3LSGHI187 |
Measured SAR |
Head: 0.60 W/kg Body: 0.71 W/kg Simultaneous Transmission: 0.98 W/kg Wireless Router: 0.75 W/kg |
Carrier Availability
Discontinued
AT&T |
---|
News




Links
User Reviews
Please note: This review is for the AT&T version, not the Sprint version.
In this day and age, it is not hard to find an inexpensive Windows Phone device. Nearly 99% of WP's sold are Nokia/Microsoft branded devices, and the vast majority of them are low to mid range WPs. But I had to find a replacement for my HTC One for Windows when I gave up on HTC, and my Lumia 920 just would not take a charge. So I found one of these on EBay for 120$. I remember liking them when I played with them in the stores and I have had good luck with Samsung branded WP's in the past. So I took a flier.
Overall, I am pleased. It updated to WP 8.1 as soon as I initiated the updates. It really does perform well. I have had no lag or stutter, something some underpowered WP's have problems with on 8.1. The screen is large enough at 4.8" to enjoy. It is bright and I have a decent time with reading it outside. I bought an SD card and have all the storage I want.
However, Samsung sold the Neo short in a few areas. It's camera is mediocre, and I am not demanding at all. The build quality is very cheap. You need a case for it, as it is so slippery plastic and light drops are a thing. Also, call quality and audio quality are just bad.
However, it is light years ahead of some of these dirt cheap WP's. I do think it is worth the price they are going at right now. I do not want a monster like the 1520, I did not want another 920. Samsung has supported this, and features like ATIV Beam and a dozen other WP apps work well. While the camera is underwhelming, there are 2 loaded apps for editing which are fun and full featured.
It does work like a charm. The build appears to be durable even if the plastic is annoying. I would say for a WP fan: Get it if you want a decent device to get you through until Hero Windows 10 mobile devices hit in late 2015.
- Good screen
- Enjoyable, practicle size.
- Excellent battery life.
- Lag free performance.
- Excellent value right now.
- Samsung has supported this device well and has numerous useful apps for their WPs.
- Camera is just not good.
- Call quality is horrid.
- Audio performance is only fair.
Latest News
Popular stories
