Samsung ATIV S Neo Specs

6.5
7.0

Description

The Samsung ATIV S Neo packs a sizable 4.8" HD display, 1.4 GHz dual-core processor and an ambitious 8MP camera that will come with a bunch of camera apps and shooting modes to augment the phone's camera capabilities.

This device is also known as Samsung I8675, Samsung SPH-I800

I want it 8 users
I have it 5 users
I had it 3 users

Specs Compare

Display

Size: 4.8 inches
Resolution: 1280 x 720 pixels, 308 PPI
Technology: TFT
Screen-to-body: 67.06 %
Colors: 16 777 216
Features: Ambient light sensor, Proximity sensor

Hardware

System chip: Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930-AA
Processor: Dual-core, 1400 MHz, Krait 300
GPU: Adreno 305
RAM: 1GB LPDDR2
Internal storage: 16GB
Storage expansion: microSDXC up to 64 GB
OS: Windows Phone, 8 Screenshots
Device type: Smartphone

Battery

Capacity: 2000 mAh
Type: Li - Ion, User replaceable

Camera

Rear: Single camera Camera samples
Main camera: 8 MP (Autofocus)
Flash: LED
Video recording: 1920x1080 (Full HD) (30 fps)
Features: Picture-taking during video recording
Front: 1.2 MP

Design

Dimensions: 5.33 x 2.72 x 0.36 inches (135 x 69 x 9 mm)
Weight: 5.08 oz (144.0 g)

Cellular

4G (FDD): Bands 25(1900+)
3G: Bands 2(1900), 1(2100)
Data Speed: LTE, HSPA, UMTS

Multimedia

Headphones: 3.5mm jack
Speakers: Earpiece, Loudspeaker
Features: Album art cover, Background playback

Connectivity & Features

Bluetooth: Yes
Wi-Fi: Yes
USB: microUSB, USB 2.0
Features: Mass storage device, Charging
Location: GPS, A-GPS
Sensors: Accelerometer, Compass
Other: NFC, Tethering, Computer sync, OTA sync

Phone features

Notifications: Haptic feedback, Music ringtones (MP3), Polyphonic ringtones, Vibration, Flight mode, Silent mode, Speakerphone
Other features: Voice dialing, Voice commands, Voice recording, TTY/TDD

Regulatory Approval

FCC approval:
Date approved: Sep 04, 2013
FCC ID value: A3LSPHI800
Measured SAR:
Head: 0.51 W/kg
Body: 1.09 W/kg
Simultaneous Transmission: 1.52 W/kg
Wireless Router: 1.09 W/kg

Availability

Jun 26, 2013
Officially announced: Yes
Despite our efforts to provide full and correct Samsung ATIV S Neo specifications, there is always a possibility of admitting a mistake. If you see any wrong or incomplete data, please

LET US KNOW.

If you are interested in using our specs commercially, check out our Phone specs database licensing page.

Alternative variants

Samsung Ativ S Neo I187
For AT&T
Differences from the main variant:
OS: Windows Phone, 8.1
Weight: 5.04 oz (143.0 g)
4G (FDD): Bands 17(700 b), 5(850), 4(AWS-1), 2(1900)
3G: Bands 5(850), 2(1900), 1(2100)
FCC approval:
Date approved: Feb 10, 2014
FCC ID value: A3LSGHI187
Measured SAR:
Head: 0.60 W/kg
Body: 0.71 W/kg
Simultaneous Transmission: 0.98 W/kg
Wireless Router: 0.75 W/kg

Carrier Availability

Discontinued

AT&T

News

User Reviews

Overall User Rating
Build quality
7
Camera quality
5
Performance
10
Display
9
Battery life and charging
10
Rating breakdown (out of 10)
7
A fine option that can be snagged cheaply.
Phone owned for less than 3 months

Please note: This review is for the AT&T version, not the Sprint version.

In this day and age, it is not hard to find an inexpensive Windows Phone device. Nearly 99% of WP's sold are Nokia/Microsoft branded devices, and the vast majority of them are low to mid range WPs. But I had to find a replacement for my HTC One for Windows when I gave up on HTC, and my Lumia 920 just would not take a charge. So I found one of these on EBay for 120$. I remember liking them when I played with them in the stores and I have had good luck with Samsung branded WP's in the past. So I took a flier.

Overall, I am pleased. It updated to WP 8.1 as soon as I initiated the updates. It really does perform well. I have had no lag or stutter, something some underpowered WP's have problems with on 8.1. The screen is large enough at 4.8" to enjoy. It is bright and I have a decent time with reading it outside. I bought an SD card and have all the storage I want.

However, Samsung sold the Neo short in a few areas. It's camera is mediocre, and I am not demanding at all. The build quality is very cheap. You need a case for it, as it is so slippery plastic and light drops are a thing. Also, call quality and audio quality are just bad.

However, it is light years ahead of some of these dirt cheap WP's. I do think it is worth the price they are going at right now. I do not want a monster like the 1520, I did not want another 920. Samsung has supported this, and features like ATIV Beam and a dozen other WP apps work well. While the camera is underwhelming, there are 2 loaded apps for editing which are fun and full featured.

It does work like a charm. The build appears to be durable even if the plastic is annoying. I would say for a WP fan: Get it if you want a decent device to get you through until Hero Windows 10 mobile devices hit in late 2015.

Read Full Review
FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless