Updated : Apr 20, 2011, 2:26 AM

Nokia E60

Full Specifications

0.064GB

970 mAh

6.2

Read All User Reviews (1)

I want it 1 user

I have it 0 users

I had it 2 users

Popular Comparisons

The Nokia E60 is most commonly compared with these phones:

Design
Dimensions	4.53 x 1.93 x 0.67 inches 115 x 49 x 17 mm
Weight	4.12 oz (117.0 g)
Features	Numeric keypad, Soft keys
Keys	Left: Volume control

Display
Resolution	416x352px
Technology	TFT
Colors	16 777 216

Hardware
Internal storage	0.064GB
Storage expansion	RS-MMC
OS	Symbian (9.1)

Battery
Capacity	970 mAh
Type	Li - Ion

Connectivity & Features
Bluetooth	1.2
WLAN	Yes
USB	Proprietary
Other	Computer sync, Infrared, SyncML, VoIP

Cellular
3G	Bands 1(2100)
Data Speed	UMTS

Phone Features
Notifications	Music ringtones (MP3), Polyphonic ringtones (48 voices), Vibration, Phone profiles, Speakerphone
Other features	Voice dialing, Voice commands, Voice recording, Push-to-Talk

Regulatory Approval
FCC approval	Date approved: Feb 08, 2006 FCC ID value: PYARM-49
Measured SAR	Head: 1.10 W/kg Measured in: 1900 MHz Body: 0.96 W/kg Measured in: 1900 MHz
EU SAR	Head: 0.68 W/kg

Availability
Officially announced	Oct 12, 2005

Despite our efforts to provide full and correct Nokia E60 specifications, there is always a possibility of admitting a mistake. If you see any wrong or incomplete data, please

LET US KNOW.

If you are interested in using our specs commercially, check out our Phone specs database licensing page.

Links

Nokia E60 Official page

Overall User Rating

(1 review)

6.2

MC [deleted]

6.2

Viable option, nonetheless disappointing

Posted: Sep 25, 2007, 11:19 AM

Phone owned for

While this is by all rights a good phone with an excellent display, I was disappointed by two of the phone's selling points (to me), which were Nokia's reputation for having excellent, responsive user interfaces; and the prospect of connecting to a wireless LAN to use the Internet. Neither of these delivered to my expectations.

the phone's lack of responsiveness and slow feedback when initiating processes or pushing any buttons in general was disappointing. In short, the phone is underpowered; I would hazard to say that the OS and display "machinery" is too bloated for the hardware it's running on.

In addition, should you make use of the wireless networking features, setting up connections (providing base connection info, etc.) and actually establishing a connection with a network is not nearly as seamless as I would have liked--though I probably had unrealistic expectations. (By comparison, the iPhone finds and connects to wireless networks easily, much like OS X does.)

The phone is stately and has a no-frills air about it, which I can appreciate, but in the end it didn't really do what I wanted. Perhaps it will do what you want, and since the time I bought the phone, the price has decreased fairly considerably. I'm rating the value based on what I paid for it in August 2006.