Google Pixel 3 Lite XL could carry a different name, pack 4GB RAM after all

Google Pixel 3 Lite XL could carry a different name, pack 4GB RAM after all
Leaked CAD-based Pixel 3 Lite XL render

Google’s in-house smartphone designs and release schedule have been rather predictable since the Nexus lineup was killed off, with three Pixel generations unveiled around the same time in the fall of 2016, 2017, and 2018 in “regular” and XL sizes.

But the search giant might be planning to mix it up sometime this spring by making a mid-range market comeback of sorts. Unfortunately, there’s no reason to expect a revival of the Nexus family, although the impending Pixel 3 Lite and Pixel 3 Lite XL may well be able to recapture the spirit of Google’s early days in the smartphone design game.

Those names are not etched in stone just yet, mind you, and based on a newly surfaced Geekbench Browser log, the Pixel 3 Lite XL could end up being called Pixel 3a XL.

Decent processing speed for a mid-ranger

If this benchmark proves legit (still a big if), the Google Pixel 3a XL already runs Android 9.0 Pie on the software side of things, while packing 4 gigs of RAM and a seemingly mysterious octa-core Qualcomm SoC.

After doing a little digging, we’re fairly confident that’s a Snapdragon 710 chipset, judging from the 1.71 GHz base frequency and a convoluted “ARM implementer 81 architecture 8 variant 6 part 2050 revision 13” identifier.

This can’t be the Snapdragon 845 (unfortunately), as even its humbler quad-core CPU cluster is clocked at 1.8, not 1.7, GHz. Perhaps more importantly, the 1640 and 4973 single and multi-core performance scores respectively of the “Pixel 3a XL” don’t exactly align with what’s typically expected of a Snapdragon 845 system.

The Pixel 3 and Pixel 3 XL regularly get around 2,300 and north of 8,000 points in these single and multi-core speed tests, so clearly, we’re looking at an unreleased mid-ranger here. But just because this no doubt advanced prototype runs the latest version of Android, it doesn’t mean the software is also optimized.

After all, the Snapdragon 710 is Qualcomm’s best non-flagship processor, designed to deliver a stellar balance between raw power and energy efficiency, with a 10-nanometer architecture, advanced AI capabilities, blazing fast LTE download speeds, and more. 

A few interesting upper mid-rangers have so far adopted the 710, including Samsung’s Galaxy A9 Pro, aka Galaxy A8s, and the Nokia 8.1, aka X7. Bottom line, it’s possible the Pixel 3a XL will be capable of solid multimedia playing, web browsing, gaming, and multitasking work when it’s actually released.

Enough memory to satisfy (almost) everyone

Speaking of multitasking, the newest benchmark seems to contradict a slightly older one that listed a Snapdragon 710-powered “Pixel 3 XL” with 6GB RAM. That smelled fishy from the get-go, though, given the actual, existing Pixel 3 XL pairs 4 gigs of the good stuff with Qualcomm’s state-of-the-art Snapdragon 845 processor from last year.

All in all, it’s far more likely the Pixel 3a XL will come with 4GB RAM, which should still be enough to satisfy all but the most demanding mobile multitaskers. While 6GB RAM has slowly become the high-end standard, and more and more companies are upping the ante in their spec wars to 10 or even 12 gigs of memory, phones like the Galaxy S9 are plenty smooth with only 4 gigs in tow.

Unfortunately, there’s not much else we can glean from Geekbench right now, other than the somewhat curious “bonito” moniker listed in the Pixel 3a XL motherboard section. This is actually a codename that was rumored a while ago in connection with a possible “mini Pixel” release.

That’s definitely not what we’re looking at here, but it remains to be seen if the jumbo-sized handset will ultimately be named Google Pixel 3a XL or Pixel 3 Lite XL. Pricing is under wraps as well, which can usually make or break a mid-range smartphone.



1. mootu

Posts: 1541; Member since: Mar 16, 2017

Google need to revamp their design team, almost every product they release is ugly as hell.

2. IgorEfremenko

Posts: 109; Member since: Nov 30, 2011

I agree to an ugly mid-ranger if it costs around $350-400 and has a Pixel 3 camera.

4. mootu

Posts: 1541; Member since: Mar 16, 2017

Problem there is it more than likely won't be $350-400. The camera will be good but i doubt Pixel 3 good as the SD 710 isp is not as good as the SD 845 and Google are not stupid enough to cannibalise the sales of it's own flagship.

6. BuffaloSouce unregistered

You sound like a teenage girl

3. tokuzumi

Posts: 2005; Member since: Aug 27, 2009

Still interested in this device, but will probably just pick up a used Pixel 3 instead.

5. drazwy

Posts: 367; Member since: Jan 15, 2014

They should give it 128G of ram with the quality of their memory management. MAYBE i could last a couple days without hanging apps.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless