The Pixel 3a has a headphone jack to offer 'flexibility', but don't get your hopes up for the Pixel 4

The Pixel 3a has a headphone jack to offer 'flexibility', but don't get your hopes up for the Pixel 4
Jack is back, but maybe not for good

The freshly released Pixel 3a and 3a XL have a long list of things (both good and bad) in common with Google's higher-end Pixel 3 and 3 XL devices, but somewhat surprisingly (at least if you didn't pay attention to the torrent of leaks from the past few months), an absent headphone jack is not one of them.

Unlike Apple, which killed good old jack several years ago, never looking back or suggesting in any way the decision would be reversed, plenty of Android smartphone manufacturers remain torn between a wired and wireless audio world. Samsung, for instance, quietly ditched the traditional 3.5 mm connector on the Galaxy Fold while retaining it to offer more options for owners of Galaxy S10-series handsets.

But although it's not entirely unusual to reconsider one's position in this heated debate (it looks like Motorola will do the same), Google basically gave the cheaper Pixel 3a duo an advantage over the "standard" Pixel 3 and 3 XL, which is certainly... odd. What might be even weirder is the first official statement delivered in regards to the reason behind the... interesting decision.

Consumers at the $399 price point need flexibility

Before sinking our teeth into that obviously ill-conceived quote (at around the 2:22 mark in the clip above) from Google Product Manager Soniya Jobanputra, we should perhaps explain what this "flexibility" really means. Or rather what the euphemism stands for. In a nutshell, Jobanputra seems to argue smartphone buyers on a budget can't always afford a nice pair of modern wireless headphones, thus needing the "flexibility" to settle for old accessories they might already have lying around the house.

In support of that pretty weak argument, Jobanputra also says Google didn't want to "create more e-waste in the world" by releasing the Pixel 3a and 3a XL without headphone jacks and indirectly encouraging people to throw away their existing wired earbuds. Naturally, that raises a lot of questions as far as the Pixel 3 and 3 XL are concerned. First of all, is e-waste not a problem when people spend $800 and up on a new handset? Or does Google just automatically assume high-end smartphone users have long discarded their conventional headphones?

But perhaps more importantly, one has to wonder why "flexibility" is only considered a must-have in certain price tiers. Who says all Pixel 3 and 3 XL buyers can afford wireless or USB-C headphones? Who says they all want to get that stuff in the first place? Finally, it's worth pointing out that the description of "digital audio" as the "ultimate way to consume" your content is not shared by all smartphone users, many of which still favor wired headphones (when offered the choice) on sound quality grounds in addition to "flexibility."

What will happen with the Pixel 4?

That's a very tough question to answer even in general terms right now, as credible rumors and leaks have been few and far between. Clearly, the Pixel 4 and 4 XL will need something special to stand out from a couple of phones available at half their prices with impressive cameras in tow and respectable overall specifications. Unfortunately, we have reason to believe Google's next-gen flagships will also differ from the Pixel 3a and 3a XL in the headphone jack department.


Otherwise, why did Jobanputra feel the need to highlight this flexibility offered by the 3.5 mm audio connector was the right approach in this particular "price tier?" Bottom line, it's probably best to keep your expectations low. It seems highly unlikely that Google will admit anytime soon that releasing the Pixel 2 without a jack was a mistake. Oh, well, at least the company isn't calling its conflicting moves "courageous" or trying to suggest killing or retaining the jack has anything to do with device thickness. 

Related phones

Pixel 3a
  • Display 5.6" 1080 x 2220 pixels
  • Camera 12.2 MP / 8 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Octa-core, 2000 MHz
  • Storage 64 GB
  • Battery 3000 mAh
Pixel 3a XL
  • Display 6.0" 1080 x 2160 pixels
  • Camera 12.2 MP / 8 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Octa-core, 2000 MHz
  • Storage 64 GB
  • Battery 3700 mAh



1. lyndon420

Posts: 6840; Member since: Jul 11, 2012

Another example of how the OEM's don't give a s**t about consumers. Glad that the new pixels have the 3.5 jack, but these OEM's want to bombard us with as much wireless waves as possible. It's not about removing the jack to make more room for other's all about forcing more wireless products on us. We didn't ask for it to be removed...but it happened regardless. At this rate in 5 years everyone will be forced to give up their fingerprints whether we like it or not.

2. TBomb

Posts: 1582; Member since: Dec 28, 2012

Giving up the fingerprint might be a slight exaggeration but I see your point. In the defense of OEMs, we do ask for a lot of "features" to be packed into a phone. Sometimes you have to nix a feature to make room for another one. Can't put the headphone jack in the bottom so they can put bigger speakers in... Can't it it up top because the multiple cameras need to fit as well as a speaker for dual front facing speakers. We as techies (generally speaking) praise every little detail of a phone so much that the ones that don't get praise sometimes get left behind. Would you give up speaker quality for headphone quality? Guaranteed some fanboys would then start saying "Derp! The iPhone has better speakers than the Shamesung". When in reality, the average consumer just wants a convenient way to listen to music. Unfortunately, we blow the SLIGHTEST difference in loudness out of proportion.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.