Twitter wars: LG says the G3 is the world's first Quad HD smartphone, Oppo disagrees
posted by Florin T.
/ Jul 21, 2014, 7:10 AM
Oops, care to use "2nd phone with Quad HD display is here" instead? Eh... doesn't have the same ring to it. Or you know… the actual number. 3rd place is still nice.
LG didn’t reply back yet.
Of course, the LG G3 is a pretty awesome device even if it’s not the very first to offer a Quad HD display. To learn more about it, read our LG G3 review here.
source: Twitter
Related phones
47 Comments
1. MarkArigayo
Posts: 240; Member since: Dec 18, 2013
LG is the first, Oppo at the 2nd place.
posted on Jul 21, 2014, 7:14 AM 3
3. MrKoles
Posts: 368; Member since: Jan 20, 2013
Are you able to understand what you read?
posted on Jul 21, 2014, 7:17 AM 24
19. itsdeepak4u2000
Posts: 3718; Member since: Nov 03, 2012
I think he didn't even read the article.
posted on Jul 21, 2014, 8:05 AM 1
22. mrblah
Posts: 577; Member since: Jan 22, 2013
*Pats fandriod on the head* You tried really hard today, I bet you're all tired out lil' guy?! Here is a teddy gram, go lay down.
posted on Jul 21, 2014, 8:44 AM 0
38. refillable
Posts: 1071; Member since: Mar 10, 2014
In what sense would you refer to 'fandroids'?
posted on Jul 21, 2014, 11:58 AM 1
2. frankg
Posts: 173; Member since: May 14, 2014
Yeah, Oppo was probably first/second, but LG is the first to make the phone widely available, and that is a fact...
Every manufacturer can make a few prototypes and claim to be first with everything.....
posted on Jul 21, 2014, 7:17 AM 2
5. Shatter
Posts: 2036; Member since: May 29, 2013
Prototypes? These have been around for months.
posted on Jul 21, 2014, 7:20 AM 4
4. drunkenjay
Posts: 1635; Member since: Feb 11, 2013
it doesnt matter what came first. if lg brought the quad hd to the market first then it is clearly faster than the find 7.
posted on Jul 21, 2014, 7:19 AM 0
6. brasstax
Posts: 539; Member since: Apr 16, 2014
Yeah the g3 is a big brand phone. But that doesn't justify the white lie.
Even OPPO comes 2nd. Vivo xplay 3s was the first.
LG could have claimed the world's 1st GLOBALLY available moniker. But world's 1st quad HD phone? 2 hoots to LG
posted on Jul 21, 2014, 7:22 AM 2
7. StraightEdgeNexus
Posts: 3689; Member since: Feb 14, 2014
Vivo xplay 3s? That one dwindled like a fart in the wind.
posted on Jul 21, 2014, 7:22 AM 1
17. JakeLee
Posts: 1021; Member since: Nov 02, 2013
XPlay of Find, neither of them went through CTS or FCC that are quite time consuming.
Not only they cannot be considered to be Android phones, they aren't even legitimate phones by today's standard for this matter.
By their standards, my former client would already have launched several 64bit Android phones, LMAO
posted on Jul 21, 2014, 7:39 AM 0
28. PapaSmurf
Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012
How the hell can they not be considered Android phones? Are you pulling information out of your ass again?
posted on Jul 21, 2014, 9:39 AM 1
18. refillable
Posts: 1071; Member since: Mar 10, 2014
No matter who's first, QHD doesn't replace FHD as of now full stop.
