Samsung Galaxy K zoom to cost less than the Galaxy S5? European prices may start at €499

Samsung Galaxy K zoom to cost less than the Galaxy S5? European prices may start at €499
Samsung announced its brand new Galaxy K zoom this morning, saying that it would start selling it in May. While the company didn’t provide details about the price of the K zoom, we’re all expecting it to be quite expensive. After all, that 20.7MP rear camera with 10x optical zoom can’t possibly come cheap. However, it looks like the new smartphone-camera hybrid will be cheaper than Samsung’s Galaxy S5 flagship handset.

According to SamMobile, the Galaxy K zoom will be priced at €499 in the Netherlands. At the moment, an unlocked Galaxy S5 costs at least €600 there (and all over Europe, for that matter). 

So perhaps the K zoom will be sold for around $500 when it lands in the US - despite the fact that €499 means around $690 at today’s exchange rates.

Besides having a possibly great camera on the back, the Samsung Galaxy K zoom offers all the features that you’d expect from a good mid-range smartphone, including: a 4.8 inch 720p Super AMOLED display, LTE connectivity, hexa-core Exynos 5 processor, 2GB of RAM, 8GB of internal memory, microSD card support, and a 2,430 mAh battery.

The Samsung Galaxy K zoom will be available in three color versions: black, white, and blue. Is anyone looking forward to buying it?


source: SamMobile

Related phones

Galaxy K zoom
  • Display 4.8" 720 x 1280 pixels
  • Camera 20.7 MP / 2 MP front
  • Processor Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa, Hexa-core, 1700 MHz
  • Storage 8 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 2430 mAh(14h 3G talk time)

FEATURED VIDEO

34 Comments

2. tech2

Posts: 3487; Member since: Oct 26, 2012

Excellent low light shots.......Look better then over-saturated colours Lumia produces.

3. ihavenoname

Posts: 1693; Member since: Aug 18, 2013

Phonearena, 1020 vs K zoom as soon as possible.

4. aksa123

Posts: 365; Member since: Jan 30, 2014

LOL, a phone vs a camera...

14. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

Well the camera on K isn't any more spectacular than 1020. Of course the zoom makes a big difference when using that.

16. _Bone_

Posts: 2155; Member since: Oct 29, 2012

Yeah but it has better phone specs too.

30. microsoftnokiawin

Posts: 1268; Member since: Mar 30, 2012

specs don't mean anything ! it's all about the user experience !

6. SIGPRO

Posts: 2810; Member since: Oct 03, 2012

over-saturated colours........you know you can adjust that right!

15. papss unregistered

You mean like ss does with their screens?

17. tech2

Posts: 3487; Member since: Oct 26, 2012

Yup. Its called amoled which is the same screen technology used by Lumia 1020. Now imagine over-saturated image on an over-saturated screen. Get the picture ? :) Unlike SS Lumia don't have the feature to switch to Adobe RGB which produces THE most accurate screen (even better then LCDs):http://www.phonearena.com/news/UL-certifies-the-4.99-FHD-display-on-the-Samsung-Galaxy-S4_id43874

19. papss unregistered

Wait so are justifying your comment? Since when does my pics on my wife's 1020 stay on the phone? Lol okay.. also using PA as a screen reference? Why stop there...SS screen tech it not at all what I would consider the best.. isn't about my preferences or do you let others tell you what is better?

24. tech2

Posts: 3487; Member since: Oct 26, 2012

'Wait so are justifying your comment?' Weren't you the one who went off topic and took a sling at SS's screen tech on a camera article ? I was merely replying not justifying. 'Since when does my pics on my wife's 1020 stay on the phone? Lol okay.. ' Its upto you what you do with your wife's pic. You may enlarge it hang t above your bed or you may keep it in your wallet its upto you. But whenever you take ur picture through your smartphone your first reference point is from that phone's display on the basis of which you judge the picture and decide to share. Not to mention most people would want to view your wife's photo on their mobile. ;) also using PA as a screen reference? If you actually bothered to click on the link you'd realize its not PA's reference, PA merely reported the news. What if I give you displaymate's link would you believe that or you'll find a excuse to disregard that too ? 'Why stop there...SS screen tech it not at all what I would consider the best isn't about my preferences.' Its YOUR opinion the experts beg to differ.http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_S5_ShootOut_1.htm do you let others tell you what is better? No. That's why I bought my GS5 before any review came out. I went instore and fell in love with its gorgeous display. 'nuff said.

25. papss unregistered

I'm not getting into your copy reply fest but my reply was to your jab at Lumia devices... Ss makes everything over saturated but you still jab at lumias.. Its pathetic that you need to justify your love of Ss by taking jabs at others. Glad you love your phone but a screen is only as good as preferences no matter what scientific bs that you try and feed everyone.

28. Alex123

Posts: 241; Member since: Oct 17, 2012

And have you owned a lumia phone? I can adjust colours as what i want on my Lumia 925. However, i have to say that the Galaxy K zoom looks much better than its previous predecessor. If the price is reasonable, i will get one too as i prefer android to wp

12. marlboro

Posts: 94; Member since: Mar 27, 2014

nice "ios" LOL!

23. sergiobr

Posts: 718; Member since: Feb 25, 2013

ois I mean

21. Doakie

Posts: 2478; Member since: May 06, 2009

I thought I wanted to trade in my Note 3 for the Galaxy K Zoom.... Now there's no doubt in my mind. If AT&T brings on the K Zoom. I'm getting one immediately!! I want this phone! 20 MP, 10x optical zoom, OIS and not crappy hardware... I'm sold! TAKE MY MONEY!!!

22. sergiobr

Posts: 718; Member since: Feb 25, 2013

Note 3 user too here, keeping it but buying K Zoom.

27. fireblade

Posts: 717; Member since: Dec 27, 2013

Can't even touch the quality of Lumia 1020

32. TheGenius

Posts: 339; Member since: Mar 06, 2014

Mahn.! These pics are brilliant.! Much better than regular point and shoot cameras.!

5. SIGPRO

Posts: 2810; Member since: Oct 03, 2012

Still a ugly phone!

11. marlboro

Posts: 94; Member since: Mar 27, 2014

we've got band aids therefore we will be having napkins too LMAO!!!

18. Doakie

Posts: 2478; Member since: May 06, 2009

Napkins? I don't get it. Dumb joke...

34. marlboro

Posts: 94; Member since: Mar 27, 2014

ask your mother to spread her legs, there you will get what I mean...

7. 0xFFFF

Posts: 3806; Member since: Apr 16, 2014

The price really needs to be kept down. The camera, for most purposes, is markedly inferior to the Sony RX100 and other top quality small cameras. While the addition of Android warrants some price increase, not many people will pay for too much price increase. Otherwise they will just get a very good camera and a very nice phone instead of this combo. If we get $499 in the US without contract, that is about right. $400-450 would be better as that is the range of the existing S4 Zoom.

8. express77 unregistered

Not good but not bad either. Much better than s4 zoom.

9. StraightEdgeNexus

Posts: 3689; Member since: Feb 14, 2014

Huh really thats common sense it is just a mid range phone with $150 level P&S camera optics.

10. hung2900

Posts: 966; Member since: Mar 02, 2012

This phone is not a common mid-range phone. Exynos 5260 is much much better than Ssnapdragon S600 while the best mid-range phone now utilizing Quad-core Cortex A7 Snapdragon S400 The screen is RGB Super Smoled 720 with more than 300ppi- crisp enough.

20. ashouhdy

Posts: 57; Member since: Oct 31, 2013

try to make this point and shoot make calls and do android !

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.