Madfinger adds the Arena of Death and other deadly things to Dead Trigger 2

Sorry man, played titanfall on PC maxed out. It's Meh graphics wise compared to other PC titles. Gameplay is nice thought

Meh Graphics compared to what?!? That's the best rated game to come out in recent history... ??? are you talking about. lol

Really?.. Its CoD : Ghosts Engine with Freerunning and Mechs.. The gameplay is fun fast and fluent, but when it comes to graphics it lacks and looks like mirrors edge and CoD Mw3.. Compare it to games like Crysis 1,2,3, BF4, Metro: last light and even CS:GO it pales.. All games i listed above is FPS games and they all have Higer Effect quality, bigger textures scales and better AA and AF aswell as FXAA. The list is HUGE if we remove the FPS only title. Btw GTA:V is the best rated game in recent history, and titanfall is top 10 yes.. but there is alot of sequels coming out this year that will beat the games Overall score aswell as GTA..

Ok that's fair but GTA 5 is an older game & Titanfall is current gen not last gen. I totally disagree on the graphics department. There is literally hundreds of things happening at once in that game & there is never anything remotely close the what is happening on screen like in Titanfall in the games you mentioned. Crysis had better graphics because there is nearly not has much happening on screen compared to the epic battles unfolding in Titanfall's gameplay... That ALWAYS makes a HUGE difference in the graphic department.

OH so thats how you're putting it okay.. ehm yea "nextgen" consolewise has just started and games like Infamous and watchdoges has it beat then.. Hundreds of thing happening at once? oh god you gotta be kidding me.. Have you ever seen how BF4 works? there is a reason why you have to have a high-end PC to run the darn games with maxed settings.. Titans fall you can run on Mid-end almost maxed Speced PC. An xbox one runs the games at medium to high settings (there is an Ultra) in 720-900p..you can try to defend the game all you want but its a small 6v6player map with bots..

Metascore xbox one : 8,6 (86) IGN : 9 Gameinformer: 9 Gamespot: 9 nowgame: 8,7 (87) Userscore (poll based) 6 There is a hand full of games in the past 1-3 years that has gotten higher scores, but no one has surpassed Ocarina of time yet and its from 1998 ;)

Yeah but Ocarina of Time is a timeless Classic WAY ahead of it's time. That's art just like the Mona Lisa... Crysis pales in comparison as does Titanfall. You are comparing Apple's and Oranges... I can compare Titanfall to other games in this & last generation.

To put it in PhoneArena talk Crysis is like Apple, & Titanfall is like Android. Crysis graphics are nice because not much is happening onscreen like Apple's so called multitasking. lol Titanfall is like Android because of it's sheer & staggering amount to stuff happening onscreen just like Android's legendary multitasking. lol

God you're dence, if you think there is much happening compared to some other games in a Titanfalls games you really are DUMB. BF4 has 64 player full out warfare + destructible environments do you know what that means at all?. It mean that your PC aswell as the server has to calculate the freaking mass/texture/coding X how many player there is on the map that enter and leaves aswell as it has to do it every second + all the player and all the Textures has to be loaded individually for each person.. that is far beyond Titansfalls capabilities aswell as its Engine. Now i want you to imagine the rest of the games that will come out for PC,ps4 and Xbox one.. Give me some Number or something that proves that titanfall has this MASSIVE Data going around and around while you're ingame! Ps. Things like dust and papers flying in the air is simple Copy paste FX with 1 layer.. so its not even hard for a phone to produce that effect.

The dence one is you. Battlefield 4 is a great game but it's last gen & graphics are worse than Titanfall's. Dude Battlefield needs 64 other PC's to work right. That will NEVER happen on a single PC... So think again... 64 person split screen... lol If that were true then you may have a point. lol Battlefield 4 VS Titanfall one on one Single player VS Single player... And I am dence... lol

Wut?, Bf4s multiplayer graphics is worse than its Singleplayer graphics... your so called "logic" is already fading. Also BF4 was last gen on consoles while still Next gen over this gens consoles since they can't handle BF4 maxed out.. BF4 on xbox one and ps4 is on High settings with no AA or AF that says alot if you know what it is.. Yea ehm.. lets put it this way you could easily go to a 64 player mapp and add 64 AFK bots and it had to do the same thing except syncing other players internet with yours.. You don't seem to know what your really talking about.. Out side the little world of FPS games, The Witcher 3 coming soon is an Open world game, Open world games is the most demanding games there is.. Why?. well, it's an Open massive world not a closed little battlefield. As much as you want titanfall to be the most demanding games there is (which is actually pretty stupid, i mean why would you want a game to be demading?) Its far from the most demanding games.. hell even Warband has to calculate alot more things than you know and its textures and effects is total sh*t .. Also FXAA and NPC is some of the most demanding things you can have onscreen. I want you to go onto youtube and search titan fall xbox one vs PC comparison press 1080 or greater i assume you have a PC that actually has a FHD or greater screen and watch the video, pause sometimes and look at edges, textures and backround..

I have seen the IGN video comparison. Titanfall on the Xbox One holds up pretty well to that $3500 to 4000.00 Power House PC. Look we will keep on going & that's fine you have your opinion & I have mine. Battlefield 4's single player is just not as good as Titanfall's single player. You Mentioned that Crysis had better graphics & I said yes because it's not processing as much as Titanfall. Then you said Battlefield 4 has 64 player multiplayer with destructible environments. I said it needs 64 other PC for that to be possible & that clearly one PC could NEVER handle 64 players. That's all I said. You think what you want. Hey it's a free world. Ohh & Witcher 3 is going to be so bada$$. Man I can't wait... +1 for that!

Ehm "Then you said Battlefield 4 has 64 player multiplayer with destructible environments. I said it needs 64 other PC for that to be possible & that clearly one PC could NEVER handle 64 players." you know that each pc has to load all the other players aswell? that how rendering,syncing works.. if my pc only loaded my account i would only be able to see me and it woudln't load if a house was going to fall down if didn't do it?. As i said before since you seems to mix how good a game is and how demanding in graphically it is, The Games is GOOD and FUN BUT NOT AS DEMANDING or and the engine that hold titanfall is not as capable as Frostbite engine which means that it can't achive the same graphical capabilities. Who said anything about a 4000 powerhouse? my pc is 1000-1500 and its High-end. a budget with 900 and you can run titans fall maxed out PC. all it takes is a gtx 760 and a cheap AMD fx8350 or an i5-3570k, i5-4570k. I'd rather just close this argument now, we're getting nowhere. And yes witcher is going to be bada$$

The IGN video was implying top of the line available... Not your setup which is very competent might I add. I have to say 1000 to 1500 is really not top of the line...

i'm using a gtx 770 gtx 4gb with an i7-3770k clocked at 4,5 ghz with a h101 hydro (liquid cooling) cooling it, 16gb of Ram with an SSD 240 Gb as my main drive. it pretty much High end and can run any game i throw at it, you don't need a gtx780ti or sli titans to run a game at max.. with 60fps + since im usually at 90 fps+. I'm using dual monitors, a QHD monitor for editing and things such as photoshop or Adobe CC while my normal FHD monitor is for gaming.

Man, it's like NeoGAF in here! :D

Hey man you started it. lol :-)

I have the Note 3 and I played DT2 on it and I can tell you those graphics are WEAK. Cheap tricks such as a shiny flat textures all over the environment, extremely low polygon face rendering in the cutscenes, repetitive modules used for the level design, etc. It actually lowers the graphics quality compared to the first game because of the increased scope and higher file compression. I deleted it from my phone very soon.

For a mobile phone the graphics are insane. I am sorry but the game CLEARLY looks better than the first. I really have NO idea how you can say it LOOKS worse than the first. ???

Well, to me the gameplay graphics are about the same quality between the two, but the first game was visually consistent, and lacked the compromises that DT2 is making. No poorly made cutscenes, no horrid voice acting and laughable hideout and stuff. Yes, DT2 is far bigger, far more varied but that expansion came with the cost of inconsistent look of the game.

F*ck i forgot about Destiny, that SH*t will be awesome as hell!, what do you think EVO?

Holy Sh*t that's right... Bungie's new game. You nailed it Astoni. That just looks incredible. I almost forgot about it until you reminded me of it. +1 again